Challenging treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with leptomeningeal metastasis: Case report and review of literature.

Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM RMSs) are rarely seen childhood tumors. Their treatment might be challenging and prognosis is poor compared to other head and neck RMS. Here we report a PM RMS presenting with leptomeningeal seeding metastasis a year after diagnosis. A five-year-old girl presented with an enlarging mass protruding from the right ear and right facial paralysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large mass extending from right external auditory canal to the temporal lobe, pterygoid fossa and nasopharynx with an intracranial component indenting the right temporal lobe and extending into the right cavernous sinus. Trucut biopsy revealed embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology was negative for malignant cells. Chemotherapy was started since it was found unresectable. At second week of chemotherapy, radiotherapy was applied to primary tumor location with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique in 1.8 Gy fractions to total dose of 50.4 Gy. At week 27, MRI showed significant response. At week 36, the patient presented with vomiting and tendency to sleep. MRI was found to be compatible with meningitis and antibacterial therapy was started. At week 39, chemotherapy was stopped. But MRI performed one month later revealed linear contrast enhancements around the spinal cord compatible with leptomeningeal metastases. Chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation were applied. But the patient did not improve and received palliative treatment. Six months after the completion of radiotherapy the patient died. Treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas require multidisciplinary approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Prognosis is poor for patients with leptomeningeal spread.

Radiotherapy for vertebral hemangioma: the single-center experience of 80 patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy and to determine possible prognostic factors in patients with painful vertebral hemangioma. METHODS: In the last two decades, 80 patients with vertebral hemangioma who received radiotherapy in our institute were evaluated in terms of pain response, treatment-related side effects, and prognostic factors. All patients were questioned 3 months after radiotherapy for the evaluation of pain response and were divided into three groups (complete response, partial response, and no change). Moreover, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain response assessment in 46 patients. Pain status was assessed to detect recurrence at each clinical examination during the follow-up period. Possible prognostic factors such as gender, size of the hemangioma, location, multilevel involvement and additional musculoskeletal disease on pain response were analyzed. RESULTS: In this study, 45 individuals had lesions in the lumbar spine, 28 in the thoracic, and 7 in the cervical region. Furthermore, 51 patients had additional musculoskeletal conditions such as disc herniation, degenerative diseases, spondylolisthesis, and compression fracture. Radiotherapy was performed with a median daily dose of 2 Gy and a median total dose of 40 Gy. Complete pain response occurred in 58.8% of patients, 26.2% of patients had partial pain response, and 15% of patients had no pain response. The overall response rate was 85%, and 7 patients showed recurrent pain symptoms in the overall response group at routine follow-up. Additional musculoskeletal disorders were found to be the only prognostic factor associated with pain response. The median follow-up time was 60 months. Secondary malignancy was not found in any of the patients in this short follow-up time. No acute or late radiation-associated side effects greater than grade II were observed. CONCLUSION: To our best knowledge, this study is one of the largest single-institution radiotherapy series on vertebral hemangiomas reported to date. The obtained data support the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy in the treatment of painful vertebral hemangioma. Our study showed that additional musculoskeletal disease plays an important role in pain response. Other prognostic factors and treatment of vertebral hemangioma with stereotactic radiosurgery should be investigated in future studies.

Treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 8-10 treated with definitive radiotherapy : TROD 09-001 multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8-10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. METHODS: Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8-10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1-T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70 Gy total irradiation dose to prostate ± seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4-18.2 years); 5­year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (≥78 Gy) and longer ADT duration (≥2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9-10. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9-10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving 'non-optimal treatment' (RT doses <78 Gy and ADT period <2 years) had the worst treatment outcomes.

Clinical prognostic factors of adjuvant radiation therapy for low-grade gliomas: results of 10 years survival.

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade gliomas compose 5-20% of all glial tumors. The prognosis of the disease can be anticipated by specific clinical factors determined during diagnosis. For this purpose, our study investigated the clinical prognostic factors for low-grade gliomas. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed low-grade glioma, followed by Akdeniz University and Süleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology between 1999 and 2013 were included in the study. The examination of survival by single variable analyses were performed by log rank test. For the multivariate analysis, independent factors for the prediction of survival by using possible factors determined by previous analyses were examined by using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was determined as 60 ± 57 (4.5-168.1) months. Five-year overall survival was determined as 69% and 10-year overall survival was determined as 40%. When the potential prognostic factors were studied in Cox regression model, pre-radiotherapy age below 40 and gross-total excision were determined as good prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the aggressive surgical resection provided a better survival advantage both in single variable analyses and multivariate analyses. Consequently, although the low number of patients was the most important limitation in our study, we consider that patient age and extent of resection are the most important clinical prognostic factors in low-grade gliomas.

Effect of complementary and alternative medicine during radiotherapy on radiation toxicity.

GOAL OF WORK: To examine the frequency and types of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients undergoing radiotherapy and to analyze the effects these therapies have on the toxicities of radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 210 consecutive cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy were included. After radiation therapy, each patient completed a standard questionnaire, and the association between radiation toxicity and complementary and alternative medicine use was analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: Among the study population, 44.3% of patients reported using at least one form of complementary and alternative medicine during radiotherapy. The most commonly chosen complementary and alternative medicine was stinging nettle. Complementary and alternative medicine use decreased lower gastrointestinal (F = 3.26, P = .009) and genitourinary toxicities (F = 2.38, P = .043), while it increased laryngeal toxicity (F = 2.63, P = .028). A significant correlation between the type of complementary and alternative medicine used and the degree of these toxicities was not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Use of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients during radiation therapy may affect the degree of radiation toxicity. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to determine the benefits and risks of complementary and alternative medicine use during radiation therapy.