The Role of Prolonged Bed Rest in Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage After Surgery of Intradural Pathology-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) is a feared complication after surgery on intradural pathologies and may cause postoperative complications and subsequently higher treatment costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prolonged bed rest may lower the risk of CSFL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with intradural pathologies who underwent surgery at our department between 2013 and 2021. Cohorts included patients who completed 3 days of postoperative bed rest and patients who were mobilized earlier. The primary end point was the occurrence of clinically proven CSFL. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-three patients were included (female [51.7%], male [48.3%]) with a mean age of 48 years (SD ±20). Bed rest was ordered in 315 cases (72.7%). In 7 cases (N = 7/433, 1.6%), we identified a postoperative CSFL. Four of them (N = 4/118) did not preserve bed rest, showing no significant difference to the bed rest cohort (N = 3/315; P = .091). In univariate analysis, laminectomy (N = 4/61; odds ratio [OR] 8.632, 95% CI 1.883-39.573), expansion duraplasty (N = 6/70; OR 33.938, 95% CI 4.019-286.615), and recurrent surgery (N = 5/66; OR 14.959, 95% CI 2.838-78.838) were significant risk factors for developing CSFL. In multivariate analysis, expansion duraplasty was confirmed as independent risk factor (OR 33.937, 95% CI 4.018-286.615, P = .001). In addition, patients with CSFL had significant higher risk for meningitis (N = 3/7; 42.8%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged bed rest did not protect patients from developing CSFL after surgery on intradural pathologies. Avoiding laminectomy, large voids, and minimal invasive approaches may play a role in preventing CSFL. Furthermore, special caution is indicated if expansion duraplasty was done.

Minimally Invasive Facetectomy and Fusion for Resection of Extensive Dumbbell Tumors in the Lumbar Spine.

Background and Objectives: Resection of dumbbell tumors can be challenging, and facet joint sparing approaches carry the risk of incomplete resection. In contrast, additional facetectomy may allow better surgical exposure at the cost of spinal stability. The aim of this study is to compare facet-sparing and facetectomy approaches for the treatment of lumbar spine dumbbell tumors. Materials and Methods: In a cohort study setting, we analyzed Eden type 2 and 3 tumors operated in our department. Conventional facet-sparing microsurgical or facetectomy approaches with minimally invasive fusions were performed according to individual surgeons' preference. Primary outcomes were extent of resection and tumor progression over time. Secondary outcomes were perioperative adverse events. Results: Nineteen patients were included. Nine patients were operated on using a facet-sparing technique. Ten patients underwent facetectomy and fusion. While only one patient (11%) in the facet-sparing group experienced gross total resection (GTR), this was achieved for all patients in the facetectomy group (100%). The relative risk (RR) for incomplete resection in the facet-sparing cohort was 18.7 (95% CI 1.23-284.047; p = 0.035). In addition, time to progression was shorter in the facet-sparing cohort (p = 0.022) and all patients with a residual tumor underwent a second resection after a median follow-up time of 42 months (IQR 25-66). Conclusions: Minimally invasive resection of lumbar Eden type 2 and 3 dumbbell tumors including facetectomy in combination with instrumentation appears to be safe and superior to the facet-sparing approach in terms of local tumor control.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Deformity Correction in the Upper Cervical Spine: A Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Kyphosis is the most common deformity of the cervical spine leading to development of severe disabilities. In case of fused kyphosis, surgical treatment can be demanding and often requires multiple-step procedures for adequate correction. We present a technique of single-stage pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) of C3 to treat a patient with fused kyphosis of C2 and C3 causing spinal stenosis with subsequent myelopathy. METHODS: A 53-year-old man presented with progressive myelopathy not able to walk with 6/18 points on the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale. Horizontal gaze was lost due to cervical kyphosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a cervical kyphosis causing stenosis, cord compression, and kinking; computed tomography (CT) showed substantial anterior and posterior fusion of C2 and C3. RESULTS: Surgery included decompression via laminectomy of C2 to C6 in combination with PSO of C3 and additional dorsal instrumentation of C2 to C6. Cervical spinal alignment was corrected, as the C2-C4 Cobb angle was reduced from 48.9 to 20.6 degrees. Horizontal gaze was restored. Postoperative MRI demonstrated full decompression of the cord without kinking of the vertebral arteries. No complications were noted. The patient recovered well with restoration of his ability to walk. CONCLUSION: Single-stage pedicle subtraction closing wedge osteotomy in the upper cervical spine, although a demanding surgical procedure, is an alternative treatment option in selected cases of fused and severe cervical kyphosis. In contrast to multiple-step approaches, the single-stage procedure could reduce operating time and may thus decrease complications.

Applicability of contemporary quality indicators in vestibular surgery-do they accurately measure tumor inherent postoperative complications of vestibular schwannomas?

BACKGROUND: Due to rising costs in health care delivery, reimbursement decisions have progressively been based on quality measures. Such quality indicators have been developed for neurosurgical procedures, collectively. We aimed to evaluate their applicability in patients that underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma and to identify potential new disease-specific quality indicators. METHODS: One hundred and three patients operated due to vestibular schwannoma were subject to analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were 30-day and 90-day reoperation, readmission, mortality, nosocomial infection and surgical site infection (SSI) rates, postoperative cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leak, facial, and hearing function. The secondary aim was the identification of prognostic factors for the mentioned primary outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-day (90-days) outcomes in terms of reoperation were 10.7% (14.6%), readmission 9.7% (13.6%), mortality 1% (1%), nosocomial infection 5.8%, and SSI 1% (1%). A 30- versus 90-day outcome in terms of CSF leak were 6.8% vs. 10.7%, new facial nerve palsy 16.5% vs. 6.1%. Hearing impairment from serviceable to non-serviceable hearing was 6.8% at both 30- and 90-day outcome. The degree of tumor extension has a significant impact on reoperation (p < 0.001), infection (p = 0.015), postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and postoperative hearing loss (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the importance of entity-specific quality measurements being applied even after 30 days. We identified the occurrence of a CSF leak within 90 days postoperatively, new persistent facial nerve palsy still present 90 days postoperatively, and persisting postoperative hearing impairment to non-serviceable hearing as potential new quality measurement variables for patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Repetitive percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for persistent idiopathic facial pain and central neuropathic pain attributed to multiple sclerosis-a retrospective monocentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) is a debilitating chronic pain condition with pain radiating to trigeminal dermatomes. Typically, there are no pathological findings that can be identified during workup and therapy is symptomatic. Facial pain is common in patients with multiple sclerosis (central neuropathic pain attributed to MS). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PRTC) of the gasserian ganglion and the duration of pain relief, as well as the identification of factors associated with its outcome. METHODS: Data on all the above-mentioned patients that have been treated with PRTC between 2009 and 2019 were included into the study. The outcome was assessed with a six-tiered score from 1 (complete remission) to 6 (no benefit). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to obtain factors associated with the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included. The total number of procedures performed was 114. 61.5% of patients who experienced temporary pain relief that lasted for a median of 60 days (range 3-1490 days). In patients with recurrence, the fraction of successful interventions was higher, and also transient, with successful pain amelioration in over 80% of patients. Successful responses to PRTC were observed in 27.9% after 1 year, 19.4% after 2 years, and 8.3% after 3 years. The only independent variable predicting pain relief was a repeat intervention with a history of ≥ 2 interventions (OR: 4.36, 95%-CI: 1.34-14.34, p = 0.015). No severe complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed good and immediate pain relief after PRTC in the majority of our patients. PRTC is a low-risk procedure that can be discussed as an option in case of failure of medical treatment even in critically ill patients and can be repeated with good results when necessary. Long-term pain amelioration, even with repeated procedures, was not possible and no patient was permanently cured.