Low Rate of Bacterial Coinfections and Antibiotic Overprescribing During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study from Oman.

Objectives: The recommended treatment for COVID-19 includes antiviral drugs, corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs, low molecular weight heparin, as well as antibiotics. Although COVID-19 is a viral disease, many studies indicate that antibiotics are prescribed frequently, mainly to treat suspected bacterial coinfection. At the same time, the prevalence of bacterial coinfections during COVID-19 is rather low indicating the significant antibiotic overuse in these patients. It is well known that this can trigger antibiotic bacterial resistance, and once it emerges the reversal of resistance is a complex and long-lasting process. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of bacterial coinfections during the COVID-19 and to analyze the antibiotic treatment justification during this pandemic in Oman. Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted using the Royal Hospital COVID-19 Registry Database. The study analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as laboratory parameters and antibiotic treatment of hospitalized patients. Results: During the study period, 584 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Coinfection was rare as it was confirmed in 0.9% of patients. Superinfections were present in 15.2% of patients. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 95 (69.9%) samples, gram-positive bacteria in 25 (18.4%) samples, while Candida spp. was found in 16 (11.8%) samples. On admission, empirical antibiotic treatment was started in 543 (93.0%) patients. Conclusions: During COVID-19, coinfections are rarely seen and the overuse of antibiotics is not justified. The incidence of superinfections is the same as in other patients in healthcare settings caused by the same resistant microorganisms, which implies the use of even more.

Biochemical, Hematological, and Immunological Biomarkers as Predictors for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with COVID-19.

Objectives: To identify the biochemical, hematological, and immune biomarkers in COVID-19 patients on admission that are predictive of eventual admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on all confirmed COVID-19 cases hospitalized at Royal Hospital, Oman from 24 February to 30 July 2020. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the hospital information system. Patients were divided into two groups: non-ICU admitted group and ICU admitted group. Results: Out of 445 patients, 276 (62.0%) were male and 169 (38.0%) were female; 259 (58.2%) patients were admitted to COVID-19 general wards whereas 186 (41.8%) were admitted to ICU. Admission to ICU was more likely when patient had the following comorbidities: diabetes (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), liver diseases (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1-4.3), and respiratory diseases (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.1-3.7). Between ICU and non-ICU patients, there were significant differences in on-admission laboratory blood/serum parameters: total white blood cells (WBCs) count, lymphocytes count, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, corrected calcium, interleukin 6 (IL-6), D-dimer, alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, and troponin. Conclusions: The current study identified the presence of the comorbidities (i.e., diabetes, liver diseases, and respiratory diseases) and on-admission laboratory blood and serum test results (i.e., WBC, lymphocytes, CRP, ferritin, corrected calcium, IL-6, D-dimer, ALT, LDH, albumin, and troponin) that are associated with ICU admission.

Therapeutic plasma exchange: A potential therapeutic modality for critically ill adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can be severe and fatal due to cytokine storm. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) potentially mitigates the harmful effects of such cytokines. We investigated the use of TPE, as rescue therapy, in patients with severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis on COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit and treated with TPE from April 17, 2020 to July 2, 2020. This group was compared with COVID-19 patients who received standard therapy without TPE. The following outcomes were analyzed: changes in laboratory parameters, length of hospital stay (LOS), days on mechanical ventilation, mortality at days 14 and overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included, among whom 47% (n = 45) received TPE. Patients who received TPE had reductions in C-reactive protein (P = .002), ferritin (P < .001) and interleukin-6 (P = .013). After employing entropy-balancing matching method, those on TPE were also more likely to discontinue inotropes (72% vs 21%; P < .001). However, they were more likely to be associated with longer LOS (23 vs 14 days; P = .002) and longer days on ventilatory support (14 vs 8 days; P < .001). Despite marginal mortality benefit at 14-days (7.9% vs 24%; P = .071), there was no significant differences in overall mortality (21% vs 31%; P = .315) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: TPE was effective in reducing inflammatory markers in patients with severe COVID-19 infection, however, further research is warranted.

Development and validation of the CoV19-OM intensive care unit score: An early ICU identification for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients from a retrospective cohort study in Oman.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical score that will identify potential admittance to an intensive care unit (ICU) for a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical scoring system was developed using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. The prediction algorithm was constructed and cross-validated using a development cohort of 313 COVID-19 patients, and was validated using an independent retrospective set of 64 COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The majority of patients were Omani in nationality (n = 181, 58%). Multivariate logistic regression identified eight independent predictors of ICU admission that were included in the clinical score: hospitalization (OR, 1.079; 95% CI, 1.058-1.100), absolute lymphocyte count (OR, 0.526; 95% CI, 0.379-0.729), C-reactive protein (OR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.006-1.011), lactate dehydrogenase (OR, 1.0008; 95% CI, 1.0004-1.0012), CURB-65 score (OR, 2.666; 95% CI, 2.212-3.213), chronic kidney disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 70 (OR, 0.249; 95% CI, 0.155-0.402), shortness of breath (OR, 3.494; 95% CI, 2.528-6.168), and bilateral infiltrates in chest radiography (OR, 6.335; 95% CI, 3.427-11.713). The mean area under a curve (AUC) for the development cohort was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87), and for the validation cohort, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88). CONCLUSION: This study presents a web application for identifying potential admittance to an ICU for a COVID-19 case, according to a clinical risk score based on eight significant characteristics of the patient (http://3.14.27.202/cov19-icu-score/).

Therapeutic plasma exchange in adults with severe COVID-19 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic use of plasma exchange in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. METHODS: A case series of critically ill adult men and non-pregnant women, ≥18 years of age, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, was studied at the Royal Hospital, Oman, from April 17 to May 11, 2020. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was performed on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with confirmed or imminent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or severe pneumonia. The analysis was performed using univariate statistics. RESULTS: A total of 31 COVID-19 patients were included with an overall mean age of 51±15 years (range: 27-76 years); 90% (n=28) were males, and 35% (n=11) of the patients had TPE as a mode of treatment. The TPE group was associated with higher extubation rates than the non-TPE cohort (73% versus 20%; p=0.018). Additionally, patients on TPE had a lower 14 days (0 versus 35%; p=0.033) and 28 days (0 versus 35%; p=0.033) post plasma exchange mortality compared to patients not on TPE. However, all-cause mortality was only marginally lower in the TPE group compared to the non-TPE group (9.1% versus 45%; p=0.055; power=66%). Laboratory and ventilatory parameters also improved post TPE (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TPE in severe COVID-19 patients has been associated with improved outcomes, however, randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to draw final, conclusive findings.