Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 413: 132398, 2024 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069093

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is widely utilized for risk stratification for non-cardiac surgical patients, yet it has not been broadly validated in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We aim to assess its ability to predict early and late outcomes of concomitant mitral valve intervention with ascending aortic surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2022 were reviewed. Age-adjusted CCI scores were calculated based on clinical status at a time of index operation. The primary endpoint was all causes mortality while secondary outcomes were major adverse events (MAE) that included combined perioperative mortality, dialysis, myocardial infarction, and stroke in addition to the individual outcomes and take back for bleeding and tracheostomy. Chi-square test, Logistic and Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to identify best cutoff of CCI for late mortality. RESULTS: 186 patients (median age 65 [interquartile range (IQR): 54-76] and 69% males) were included with a median CCI of 4 [IQR: 3-6]. Five and ten-years overall survival were 95.9% and 67.1% vs 59.7%, and 19.9% in CCI ≤ 5 vs >5 (P < 0.001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, higher CCI (HR 1.60 [1.17;2.18], P = 0.00), and lower EF (HR 0.89 [0.83;0.96], P = 0.002) were associated with late mortality. There was a trend to lower mortality in recent surgery years (HR 0.91 [0.83;1.01], P = 0.070)). Perioperative MAE was higher in CCI >5 (11.0% vs 2.1%, P = 0.017), and postoperative need for tracheostomy and CVA had a trend to be higher in CCI > 5 (P = 0.055). Logistic regression revealed that higher CCI, as a continuous variable, was associated with significantly higher odds of MAE, postoperative dialysis, and need for tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The CCI can be a helpful tool in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant mitral valve intervention with ascending aortic surgery.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Valva Mitral , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Aorta/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 166(6): 1548-1557.e2, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37164052

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare operative and long-term outcomes between patients with and without Marfan syndrome undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We identified all consecutive patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 1997 and 2022. Primary outcome was composite of major adverse events. Secondary outcomes were individual complications and long-term survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term survival. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with major adverse events. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-four patients underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ninety (13.1%) had Marfan syndrome, whereas 594 (86.9%) did not. Marfan patients were younger (46 years [range, 36-56 years] vs 69 years [range, 61-76 years]; P < .001). Extent II or III aneurysms (57 out of 90 [63.3%] vs 211 out of 594 [35.6%]; P < .001) and type I or III chronic dissection (77 out of 90 [85.3%] vs 242 out of 594 [40.8%]; P < .001) were more common. Cardiovascular risk factors were less frequent in Marfan patients. There was no difference in major adverse events between groups (12 out of 90 [13.3%] vs 100 out of 594 [16.8%]; P = .49). Operative mortality was similar between groups (3 out of 90 [3.3%] vs 28 out of 594 [4.7%]; P = .75). Unweighted survival at 10 years was 78.7% vs 46.8% (P = .001). Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in long-term survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.32-1.99; P = .62; Log-rank P = .12). At multivariable analysis, renal insufficiency (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.43-3.68; P < .01) and urgent/emergency procedure (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.35-3.48; P < .01) were associated with major adverse events, whereas Marfan syndrome was not (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.69-3.49; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair can be performed with similar operative outcomes in patients with and without Marfan syndrome despite differing risk profiles. Operative/perioperative strategies must be tailored to specific needs of each patient to optimize outcomes.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica , Aneurisma da Aorta Toracoabdominal , Dissecção Aórtica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Síndrome de Marfan , Humanos , Síndrome de Marfan/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/etiologia , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA