Outcomes of orthopaedic trauma surgery in COVID-19 positive patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate outcomes for operative orthopaedic trauma in patients who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Urban Level-1 academic trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who underwent surgical management for orthopaedic trauma between January 21, 2020 and May 11, 2020. INTERVENTION: Does not apply to this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications including death, coma lasting more than 24 hours, prolonged mechanical ventilation, unplanned intubation, blood transfusion, postoperative pneumonia, cerebrovascular event, thromboembolic event, myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, septic shock, return to the operating room, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, graft/prosthesis/flap failure, and peripheral nerve injury. RESULTS: Two (18%) patients had symptoms of COVID-19 (cough, shortness of breath, fevers, chills, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramps/pains) on admission. Average length of stay (standard deviation) was 6.6 (4.31) days. Average time to follow up was 29 (10.77) days. Three (27%) patients developed pneumonia postoperatively and 1 (9%) underwent unplanned intubation. One (9%) patient was intubated for greater than 48 hours. Two (18%) patients developed postoperative deep venous thromboembolism. Three (27%) patients developed acute renal failure postoperatively. Six (55%) patients underwent blood transfusion intraoperatively or postoperatively. Two (18%) patients died postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In this small series surgical management in Coronavirus-19 positive patients with skeletal injuries was successfully accomplished with patient anticoagulation, hematologic, and pulmonary status in mind. Therapeutic anticoagulation and patient hematologic status were optimized prior to the operating room to minimize development of venous thromboembolism and avoid blood transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV prognostic.

Orthopaedic Surgeon Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: This study compares rates of depression, suicidal ideation, and burnout among resident/fellow and attending physicians in orthopaedic surgery to other specialties during height/end of the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at our institution. Main outcomes and measures included suicidal ideation, Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression (PHQ-9) scores for depression, and 2 single-item measures for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. This study provides valuable information regarding orthopaedic surgeon mental health during world crises. Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey-based study of resident, fellow, and attending physicians from 26 specialties during and after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic at our institution from April 24, 2020 to May 15, 2020. The survey contained 22 items. This includes consent, demographics and general data, 2 single-item questions of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and the PHQ-9. Subjects were eligible if they were a resident/fellow or attending physician at our institution. Results: The response rate for the study was 16.31%. Across all specialties rates were 6.2% depression, 19.6% burnout, and 6.6% suicidal ideation. The results for orthopaedic surgeons are as follows: 0% tentative diagnosis of depression, 3.8% suicidal ideation, and 4% burnout. Anesthesiology had the highest rate of depression (14.3%). Internal medicine and other non-surgical specialties had the highest rate of suicidal ideation (10.2%). Orthopaedic surgeons were significantly more likely to achieve work-life balance and experience less burnout than anesthesiologists and pediatricians. Discussion: Depression, suicidal ideation, and burnout continue to affect physicians across all specialties. These issues are amplified in light of crisis. Job satisfaction and rigorous training may be protective factors that allow orthopaedic surgeons to adapt to novel clinical settings under stress when compared to anesthesiologists and pediatricians. Resilience training and stress management strategies should continue to be investigated to better prepare physicians for world crises.

Hip Fractures Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Demographics and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York, hip fractures requiring operative management continued to present to Stony Brook University Hospital. Given the novelty of SARS-CoV-2, there is recent interest in the pandemic and its relationship to orthopedic operative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes for operative hip fractures in patients prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a level 1 academic center. Materials and Methods: Data was collected on patients age 18 years or older who underwent operative management for hip fractures performed from January 21, 2019 to July 1, 2019 (pre-pandemic) or from January 21, 2020 to July 1, 2020 (pandemic). COVID-19 status, demographics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 159 patients with hip fractures were included in this study, 103 in the 2019 group and 56 in the 2020 group. Within the 2019 group, there was a significantly greater proportion of female patients compared to 2020 (p = 0.0128). The length of hospital stay was shorter for the 2020 group by 1.84 days (p = 0.0138). COVID-19 testing was positive in 4 (7.1%) patients in the 2020 group, negative for 22 patients (39.3%), and the remaining 30 patients in the 2020 group (53.7%) were not tested during their admission. There were no other significant differences in demographics or outcomes between the 2019 and 2020 groups. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly alter most aspects of care for hip fracture patients at our institution. Interestingly, postoperative pulmonary outcomes were not affected by the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a significantly higher proportion of males presented with hip fractures in the pandemic group. In addition, the average length of hospital stay was shorter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to understand the nuances that may lead to improved care for patients with hip fractures during a pandemic.

Initial Stability of Cemented vs Cementless Tibial Components Under Cyclic Load.

BACKGROUND: Cement fixation of total knee components remains the gold standard despite resurgence in cementless fixation with the goal of long-term durable fixation. Initial stability is paramount to achieve bony ingrowth of cementless components. METHODS: Twelve cemented and cementless tibial baseplates were implanted into sawbones and tested using a physiological medial-lateral load distribution for 10,000 cycles to represent 8 weeks of in vivo function. Micromotion was measured at 5 locations around the baseplate during loading. RESULTS: Cycling had a significant effect on the change in micromotion between maximum and minimum loads at the anterior, medial, lateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral tray edge locations. A significant effect of fixation technique was detected for the anterior (P < .001), medial (P = .002), and lateral (P = .0056) locations but not for the posteromedial (P = .36) or posterolateral (P = .82) locations. Differences in micromotion between cemented and cementless components did not exceed 150 µm at any tested location. CONCLUSION: The micromotion experienced by cementless tibial components in the present study may indicate a lower initial mechanical stability than the cemented group. However, this difference in initial stability may be subclinical because the differences between average cemented and cementless micromotion were <150 µm at all measured locations under the loading regime implemented.