Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 43(3): 150-3, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26145180

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Aside from examination for Clostridium difficile, the yield of stool testing in hospital-onset diarrhea is poor. Clinical practice guidelines discourage overzealous stool testing in patients with diarrhea that develops after the third hospital day. However, the adoption of this recommendation into clinical practice is limited. Furthermore, the effect of microbiology laboratory improvements on hospital-onset diarrhea testing is largely unknown. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated community-hospital and included all adult inpatients who developed diarrhea after hospitalization. RESULTS: 132 adult patients (53% female) developed diarrhea after hospitalization in 2013. The cohort's mean age was 55.6 years. 46.2% of patients developed diarrhea in the first 3 days of hospitalization. Testing for parasites was negative in all examined 67 samples. Testing for C. difficile was positive in 13 cases (10.8%) out of 120 tested samples. Testing for other pathogens was positive in 1 sample (Campylobacter) out of 129 samples. Stool samples tested in the first 3 days of hospitalization were more likely to be positive (64.3 vs 35.7%, p = 0.1). Change in management was reported in 9 out of 14 patients (64.3%) with positive stool testing compared with 31 out of 118 patients (26.3%) with negative stool testing, p = 0.01. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in stool samples' testing, the yield continues to be low, especially in hospital-onset diarrhea past the third hospital day. Physicians' embracement of the '3-day rule' continues to be poor.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Diarreia/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Salmonella enteritidis/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20132013 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23709151

RESUMO

Enteral nutrition is the preferred route of feeding in critically ill patients. It has multiple advantages over parenteral nutrition and potentially improves patients' outcome. Enteral nutrition is delivered via gastric or postpyloric (small intestine) feeding tubes. The latter option used to be a more challenging choice to achieve unless the feeding tube is placed endoscopically or by interventional radiology. Multiple technical advances have facilitated postpyloric feeding, including a new electromagnetically visualised jejunal feeding tube system (CORTRAK Enteral Access System). We are presenting a case of a 50-year-old woman who suffered a nasopharyngeal perforation caused by this novel technology. The complication was recognised promptly and managed successfully with conservative measures. This case illustrates the importance of recognising patients at high risk for feeding tube placement complications, meticulous placement technique and appropriate follow-up once the tube has been inserted.


Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/instrumentação , Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Doenças Nasofaríngeas/etiologia , Nasofaringe/lesões , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA