Quality management system applied to organ donation: United Arab Emirates experience

BACKGROUND: The 3rd Global Consultation on Organ Donation and Transplantation stated that every nation should achieve self-sufficiency in organ donation. In the Middle East the deceased organ donation (DD) average rate is 2.29 donors/pmp. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) started their DD program in 2017 approving brain death declaration. UAE National Transplant Committee started an international collaboration with Donation and Transplantation Institute (DTI Foundation) in 2017 for the development of the DD program. In 2019, 4 hospital-based organ donation unit (H-ODU) were established in Abu Dhabi. The aim of this study was to combine the ISO 9001:2015 quality management system (QMS) and the Organ Donation European Quality System (ODEQUS) to improve DD. METHOD: SEUSA is based on the Spanish, European and USA models tailored to the local needs. The QMS used was a combination of the ISO with ODEQUS methodology. The Abu Dhabi hospitals were selected according to their DD potentiality. Monthly follow-up between H-ODU's staff and DTI team were performed to monitor SOPs development and ODEQUS KIPs measurement. After a 6 months implementation period, an internal audit was performed by a DTI experts in DD/ISO QMS. Finally, an external audit was performed and ISO 9001:2015 quality certification was granted. RESULTS: 10 SOPs regarding DD were developed per unit and 4 ODEQUS key indicators (KPI) were selected (Table 1). After completed the internal audits, 1 H-ODU applied for the external audit and quality certification. As a result of the measures implemented, UAE moved from 0 donors to 1.1 donors/pmp in 2019. Lastly, in 2020 the Abu Dhabi Department of Health released the KPIs as a mandate for all hospitals to improve DD performance. CONCLUSION: The collaboration between local and international organization supports the successful implementation of DD best practices in new regions.

Transplant professionals vary in the long-term medical risks they communicate to potential living kidney donors: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Discussing long-term medical risks with potential living donors is a vital aspect of informed consent. We considered whether there are global practice variations in the information communicated to potential living kidney donors. METHODS: Transplant professionals participated in a survey to determine which long-term risks are communicated to potential living kidney donors. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed in person and by electronic mail. RESULTS: We surveyed 203 practitioners from 119 cities in 35 different countries. Sixty-three percent of participants were nephrologists, and 27% were surgeons. Risks of hypertension, proteinuria or kidney failure requiring dialysis were frequently discussed (usually over 80% of practitioners discussed each medical condition). However, many practitioners do not believe these risks are increased after donation, with surgeons being less convinced of long-term sequelae compared with nephrologists (P < 0.01). About 30% of practitioners discuss long-term risks of premature cardiovascular disease or death with potential donors. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant professionals vary in the long-term risks they communicate to potential donors. Improving consensus will enhance decision-making, and emphasize best practices which maintain good, long-term donor health.