Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: Research status and trends.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on VWD. The publications on VWD from 1956 to 2021 were extracted using the Web of Science database. In the VWD domain, a total of 3,643 records were analyzed for authorship and collaboration patterns, yearly productivity, highly cited documents, relevant source of publication, most prolific scholars, productive countries, and organizations. RESULTS: The most productive journal, author, organization, and country were 'Haemophilia' with 439 publications, 'Favaloro EJ' with 119 publications, the 'University of Milan' with 192 publications, and the United States of America (USA) with 1,048 publications, respectively. The document with the highest citations was 'Srivastava A, 2013, Haemophilia,' which received 1,154 citations in total. In 2016, the highest number of publications shared by two author patterns was 28. With 199 publications, the year 2021 remained on the top, while the citation-wise analysis identified 2006 as the top year with 5,379 citations. CONCLUSIONS: Research productivity and publication trends on VWD revealed that the USA emerged as the most significant contributing country. The 'University of Milan' was the most significant contributing organization, while 'Favaloro EJ' was the most significant author. 'Hemophilia' was found to be the most significant journal in the field of VWD. It is recommended that researchers from countries with significant contributions to the field should collaborate with researchers from Asian countries and other countries that lack behind in research in the domain of VWD.(www.actabiomedica.it).

Pneumothorax in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Prevalence, Analysis of Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: Previous studies have been conducted to assess pneumothorax. However, few studies were done to assess pneumothorax in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: Our aim is to describe and analyze the prevalence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 pneumothorax patients in the intensive care unit. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 418 patients, who tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction test and required ICU admission in King Fahad Hospital of The University from 02/01/2020 to 01/09/2021. A total number of 36 pneumothorax patients were included in the study. Results: Of 418 patients who were followed up in the intensive care unit as COVID-19 cases, 36 patients developed a pneumothorax (8.61%). The mean age of the patients was 55.6 ± 15.06 years, 23 patients were male, and 13 were female. Seventeen patients were obese, and only one patient was an active smoker. Twenty-four patients had at least one comorbidity; hypertension was the most common. Thirty-two patients were intubated, and the duration of intubation was 23.23 ±15.9 days. The time from intubation to pneumothorax development was 8.8 ± 9.3 days. Six patients were on bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation (BIPAP), 2 patients on continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (CPAP), 3 patients on High-Flow Nasal Cannula ventilation (HFNC), 9 patients on pressure-control ventilation (PC), and 16 patients on pressure regulated volume control ventilation (PRVC). Of 36 patients, 26 died, and the mortality rate was 72.2%. Conclusion: Our study showed that risk factors of pneumothorax occurrence in COVID-19 critically ill patients include male patients, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. More efforts should be made to determine the risk factors and assess the outcomes of those patients to develop preventive measures and management guidelines.