An explanatory mixed methods study on the validity and validation of students' assessment results in the undergraduate surgery course.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is inadequate evidence of reported validity of the results of assessment instruments used to assess clinical competence. This study aimed at combining multiple lines of quantitative and qualitative evidence to support interpretation and use of assessment results. METHOD: This study is a mixed methods explanatory research set in two stages of data collection and analysis (QUAN : qual). Guided by Messick's conceptual model, quantitative evidences as reliability and correlation coefficients of various validity components were calculated using students' scores, grades and success rates of the whole population of students in 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 (n= 383; 326). The underlying values that scaffold validity evidences were identified via Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with faculty and students; sampling technique was purposive; and results were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: (1) Themes that resulted from content analysis aligned with quantitative evidences. (2) Assessment results showed: (a) content validity (table of specifications and blueprinting in another study); (b) consequential validity (positive unintended consequences resulted from new assessment approach); (c) relationships to other variables [a statistically significant correlation among various assessment methods; with combined score (0.64-0.86) and between mid and final exam results (r = 0.672)]; (d) internal consistency (high reliability of MCQ and OSCE: 0.81, 0.80); (3) success rates and grades distribution alone could not provide evidence to advocate an argument on validity of results. CONCLUSION: The unified approach pursued in this study created a strong evidential basis for meaningful interpretation of assessment scores that could be applied in clinical assessments.

Risk factors of coronary heart disease among medical students in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) represents an escalating worldwide public health problem. Providing consistent data on the magnitude and risk factors of CVDs among young population will help in controlling the risks and avoiding their consequences. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to estimate the prevalence of risk factors of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) among medical students during their clinical clerkship (4th - 6th years). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done during the educational year 2012-2013 at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah. Ethical standards were followed and a multistage stratified random sample method was used for selection of 214 medical students. Data was collected through an interviewing questionnaire, measurements and laboratory investigations. Both descriptive and analytical statistics were done by SPSS version 21. CHD risk percent in thirty years was calculated using Framingham algorithm for each student, then the risk among all students was determined. RESULTS: The commonest risk factors of CHDs were daily intake of high fat diet (73.4%), physical inactivity (57.9%), overweight/or obesity (31.2%) and daily consumption of fast food (13.1%). Hyper-cholesterolemia (17.2%) and hypertension (9.3%) were also prevalent risk factors. Smoking prevalence was low (2.8%). Males had significantly higher mean scores for most of CHD risk factors compared to females (p < 0.05). Systolic Blood pressure was higher among males (119.47 ± 11.17) compared to females (112.26 ± 9.06). A highly statistical significant difference was present (Students't test = 4.74, p < 0.001). Framingham Risk Score revealed that CHD risk percent in thirty-years among all students was 10.7%, 2.3% and 0.5% for mild, moderate and severe risk, respectively. CONCLUSION: An alarmingly high prevalence of CHD risk factors was prevailed among medical students, especially among males. However, a low prevalence of smoking may indicate the success of "Smoke-free Campus" program. Screening risk factors of CHD among medical students and implementation of intervention programs are recommended. Programs to raise awareness about CHD risk factors, encourage young adult students to adopt a healthy dietary behavior and promote physical exercise should be initiated.

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Is it a different disease or different aspects of a single disease?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between autoimmune thrombocytopenia with other autoimmune disorders, to show if they are different autoimmune diseases or one disease with different presentations at the same time, and to study the effect of treatment on platelet count in different thyroid condition. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 141 patients with thrombocytopenic purpura. The result of thyroid function test, thyroid autoantibodies, Coombs' reactivity, anti-nuclear antibody, and double-stranded DNA were analyzed. This study was conducted in the Clinical Hematology Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between June 2003 and August 2010. RESULTS: There were 51 (36.2%) patients with laboratory evidence of autoimmune disease, 13 (9.2%) with hypothyroidism, and 6 (4.3%) with hyperthyroidism. In addition, 5 (3.5%) patients showed laboratory evidence of Evan syndrome and 3 (2.1%) patients had isolated positive thyroid antibodies. There was non-significant difference (p=0.61) in platelets count after one month of treatment of patients with different thyroid condition. CONCLUSION: Immune thrombocytopenia is associated with evidence of different autoimmune disease or a combination of them, which may appear at presentation or during the course of disease giving evidence that they are different manifestations of a single disease. Screening patients for antithyroid antibodies would identify a patient at risk of developing overt thyroid disease. These patients may be further screened with a thyroid-stimulating hormone assay to detect subclinical thyroid disease.

Gastrointestinal Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a clinico-pathological study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the clinico-pathological features of primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (GI NHL) at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, and to compare our results to those reported in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three adult patients with primary GI NHL diagnosed over a 5-year period (2000 through 2005) were retrospectively studied clinically and histopathologically. They were classified using the REAL/WHO histopathologic classification. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients with primary GI NHL, 14 (60.9%) were Saudis, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. The mean age of male patients was 61. 3 years, ranging from 42-83 years with an SD of +/-13.09; while for females, the mean age was 64 years, ranging from 50-75 years with an SD of +/-9.14. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (78.3%), and the most common primary site was the stomach (73.9%), followed by the small bowel (13%). The most frequent histologic subtype was the diffuse large B cell lymphoma, accounting for 60.9% of all cases, followed by the marginal-zone cell lymphoma (MALT type), which was Helicobacter pylori associated (39.1%). A large proportion of patients with primary GI NHL had early disease (Stage IE - 20%, Stage IIE - 58.6%). With regards to treatment, 15 patients (65.2%) had chemotherapy, while only 2 patients (8.7%) were treated by Helicobacter pylori eradication. The overall 5-year survival was 47.8%. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrated that primary GI NHL is more common among males, mainly in their sixth decade. Abdominal pain is the most common presenting symptom, with stomach being the most common involved site. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma is the most frequent histologic subtype, followed by extranodal marginal-zone B cell lymphoma (MALT type), which was Helicobacter-associated. A majority of cases have early disease (stage IE and IIE), mostly treated by combination chemotherapy.