Erratum to "Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathology Requests and Reports Are Lacking Important Information".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/4876309.].

Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathology Requests and Reports Are Lacking Important Information.

INTRODUCTION: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting humans. Luckily it has negligible risk for metastasis; however it can be locally destructive to surrounding tissue. The diagnosis of this tumor relies on clinical and dermoscopic features; however confirmation requires biopsy and histologic examination. Based on clinical and pathologic findings, BCC is classified as low or high risk subtype. The clinician requesting pathology examination for BCC should provide the pathologist with detailed information including patient details, relevant clinical and medical history, site and type of the biopsy, and whether this is a primary or recurrent lesion. The pathologist on the other hand should write an adequate report containing a minimum of core set of parameters including type of BCC, depth of invasion, presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and the excision margins. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether requests by clinicians and pathology reports of BCC are adequate. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis done at the dermatology department, faculty of medicine at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. Reports for the period from January 2003 to December 2017 were retrieved and analyzed for data completeness. RESULTS: Most clinical request forms of BCC provided by clinicians are inadequate and lack important relevant information especially in regard to lesion history, patient medical history, and whether BCC is a primary or a recurrent one. Pathology reports for BCC cases also have significant deficiency especially in describing the histologic subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. However, the tumor excision margins are adequately described in almost all reports. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that clinicians do not provide adequate clinical information when submitting a request for histopathologic examination of BCC. Similarly, pathologists write incomplete reports that lack important pathologic features. Having pre-set forms (electronic proforma) can help overcome missing information.

Pityriasis rotunda. A clinical study in Jordan: experience of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Pityriasis rotunda is a rare skin disease characterized by the presence of multiple, round or oval, sharply demarcated hyperpigmented scaly patches. It has been described in Japan, South Africa, and in some other countries. The cause of pityriasis rotunda is usually idiopathic but may be associated with certain internal malignancy or systemic diseases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe this rare entity in Jordan in a retrospective study during the last 10 years. Jordan, as a Middle Eastern country, had no previous reports about this rare disease. In addition, the intention was to report any systemic association with the disease. Some of the cases were examined by dermoscopy. No previous reports documented dermatoscopic features of the disease. RESULTS: We could report 23 cases during the last 10 years. Eighteen cases were females and five males, in an age range of 9-38 years. There were three familial cases. The dermatoscopic findings were well demarcated, hyperpigmented with brownish patches with polygonal scales. These scales were more defined, not homogeneous in color, and separated from each other by paler stria. CONCLUSIONS: The cases of the study seem to indicate the rarity of the disease in Jordan. Our case fits neatly into the benign form of the disease with lack of association with any underlying diseases.