Systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the racial disparities in the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Race-based disparities in health care have been related to a myriad of prevailing factors among minorities in the United States. This study aims to study the race-based differences in the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: The PROSPERO database registered the review protocol (CRD42023428253). A systematic English literature review was performed using literature databases PubMed and Scopus from inception till June 2023. The review was designed on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and included studies reporting mortality, stroke, or composite outcome of mortality and stroke after CEA for carotid artery disease, regardless of any degree of stenosis including both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A pooled odds ratio (OR) for the overall mortality was computed, and a P value of < .05 was designated as statistically significant. Interstudy heterogeneity was evaluated by Q-metric and quantified using Higgins I2 statistics. RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified which included a total of 574,055 patients who underwent CEA from 1998 to 2022. Eleven of 12 studies reported 30-day mortality as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA in which 524,708 patients (92.5%) were White and 42,797 (7.5%) were non-White. The overall pooled OR indicated a statistical significance in 30-day mortality between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.18; P = .011) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 56.3%). Eleven of 12 studies reported stroke as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA in which 524,708 patients (92.5%) were White and 42,801 (7.5%) were non-White. The overall pooled OR indicated no statistical significance in stroke between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65; P = .111) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 35.9%). Five of 12 studies reported composite mortality or stroke as an outcome for patients undergoing CEA. The overall pooled OR indicated no statistical significance in composite mortality or stroke between White and non-White patients undergoing CEA (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.59; P = .467) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-White patients have a relatively higher risk of mortality; however, no significant difference was observed between the racial groups in terms of stroke or a composite outcome of mortality or stroke. The odds of mortality in non-White patients have been persistent throughout recent studies.

Black or African American patients undergo great saphenous vein ablation procedures for advanced venous disease and have the least improvement in their symptoms after these procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic venous insufficiency is an increasingly prevalent problem in the United States, with >25 million individuals currently affected. Previous work has shown that racial minorities and low socioeconomic status are associated with a worse clinical presentation and response to treatment. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between race, patient variables, hospital outcomes, and response to treatment for patients presenting for chronic venous insufficiency intervention. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent endovenous ablation (radiofrequency or laser) of the great saphenous vein to treat symptomatic, chronic venous insufficiency using Vascular Quality Initiative data from 2014 to 2020. Patient characteristics and outcomes were analyzed stratified by patient race. The χ2 test and the Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test were used to measure the study outcomes. The primary outcomes were an improved venous clinical severity score and improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Patient characteristics, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, prior venous interventions, length of stay, and time to follow-up were compared between races. RESULTS: The database consisted of 9009 predominantly female patients (n = 6041; 67.1%), with a mean age distribution of 56 years. Of the 9009 patients, 7892 are White (87.6%), 627 Hispanic (6.9%), and 490 Black or African American (18.3%). The Hispanic cohort was younger than their White and Black/African American counterparts. Black/African American patients presented with more advanced clinical stages than did the White and Hispanic groups. The clinical stage according to race was as follows: C3-Black/African American, 32.9%; Hispanic, 38.9%; White, 46%; C5-Black/African American, 4.7%; Hispanic, 2.1%; White, 2.3%; and C6-Black/African American, 12.7%; Hispanic, 3.2%; White, 6.2%. Black/African American patients were more likely to present as overweight or obese (66%; P < .001) and less likely to be taking anticoagulation medication preoperatively (11%; P < .001). Non-White race was associated with a higher probability of treatment in the hospital setting (Black/African American, 63.6%; Hispanic, 87.5%; P < .001). Black/African American patients (3.25 ± 4.4; P < .001) demonstrated lower mean improvement postoperatively in both the venous clinical severity score and patient-reported outcomes than their White (4.25 ± 4.13, P <.001) and Hispanic (4.42 ± 3.78; P < .001) counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in the clinical severity and symptom presentation based on race. Black/African American patients present with more advanced chronic venous insufficiency than do their White and Hispanic counterparts. Furthermore, the postprocedural analysis showed inferior clinical and self-reported improvement in chronic venous insufficiency for the Black/African American patients. Although the Hispanic population was younger, the White and Hispanic patients experienced similar responses to treatment.

Association of Preoperative Frailty with Inferior Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Bypass for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a risk factor associated with adverse postoperative outcomes following lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the worst form of PAD, and frailty is common among patients presenting with CLTI. Multiple frailty assessment scores have been developed for the past 2 decades; however, a universal clinical assessment tool for measuring frailty has not yet been established due to the complexity of the concept. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of a frailty index as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing LEB. METHODS: The review protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022358888). A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A total of 3,929 studies were initially selected originally and were eventually left with 6 studies that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. RESULTS: Six studies were examined that assessed the relationship between frailty index and long-term mortality following LEB for CLTI were screened. All analyses were published between 2017 and 2020 and included a broad spectrum of patients who underwent LEB. The results of these studies showed inconsistencies in the reporting of postoperative outcomes and the time endpoint of these events. However, all correlated with higher frailty index and increased mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Higher frailty index preoperatively is associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative comorbidities after undergoing LEB. Identifying and addressing the preoperative frailty index of these patients may be a practical approach to reducing postoperative adverse outcomes. A thorough review of the frailty spectrum and standardized reporting of outcomes in the context of frailty could be helpful to have a more comprehensive understanding of this subject.