Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Taibah Univ Med Sci ; 19(3): 696-704, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827496

RESUMO

Background: Student-centered learning strategy increases the likelihood of graduation of competent, self-dependent, and problem-solving physicians. The University of Bisha, College of Medicine (UBCOM) adopted self-directed learning (SDL) represented by problem-based learning (PBL), and directed self-learning (DSL) represented by team-based learning (TBL). Aim: To compare the students' performance in SDL and DSL among UBCOM students. Methodology: A total of 502 multiple choice questions (MCQs) from the mid-course and final exams were collected by the relevant subject experts from nine courses during the period from September 2020 till June 2023 that adopted PBL and TBL; 247 MCQs related to PBL and 255 related to TBL. Psychometric analysis was used to determine difficult, easy, and optimum questions (≤25%, ≥90%, and 26-89%, respectively). Point biserial as <0.19, 0.20-0.29, 0.30-0.39, and >0.40 which indicate poor, marginal, good, and excellent point biserial, respectively. Finally, the number of functional distractors was attempted by >5% of the candidates. Results: No significant differences were noted for the students' performance in MCQs related to PBL (representing self-directed, small group learning tool), and TBL (representing directed-self, large group learning tool) regarding difficulty index (DI), point biserial, and distractors functionality. Conclusion: It has been observed that there is no difference in students' performance whether PBL or TBL is used for learning Basic Medical Science courses. Small group learning such as PBL needs more resources in comparison to large group learning as in TBL, therefore any institute can decide on the adopted learning strategy depending on its resources and the number of students.

2.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57448, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699122

RESUMO

Background Preoperative investigations are important to assess the clinical condition of patients who undergo elective surgical procedures. However, there is still debate about the usefulness of performing preoperative investigations. We aimed to determine the prevalence of routine preoperative investigation abnormalities among elective general surgery patients. Methodology This retrospective hospital-record-based study was conducted at the King Abdullah Hospital in Bisha Province, southern Saudi Arabia. General and clinical data of 968 patients who underwent elective surgical interventions from February 2022 to January 2023 were retrieved and analyzed. Result A total of 968 patients (578 females and 390 males) aged between 14 and 80 years were included in the study. Four hundred and eleven (42.5%) patients were in the age group of 40 years and above. The commonly detected comorbidities among the patients were diabetes (15%), hypertension (12%), respiratory diseases (7.5%), and cardiac diseases (2.5%). Abnormalities related to hemoglobin (31%), total leucocyte count (12.7%), and platelets (8.5%) were found in 968 patients. Around 15% of patients had increased creatinine levels. Hypokalemia was observed in 6.8% of patients. Increased liver enzymes were reported in limited proportions (10% to 14%) of patients. Slightly abnormal radiological findings were reported for chest X-ray (CXR) (2.8%), electrocardiogram (ECG) (2%), and Doppler echocardiography (Echo) (0.8%). A statistically significant association between the age of the patient and abnormal findings of ECG (p <.001), Echo (p = .001), and CXR (p <.001). Cardiac abnormalities were commonly associated with patients of ≥ 40 years. Abnormal cardiac findings (CXR, ECG, Echo) were significantly (p<.05) increased with the presence of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Conclusions Preoperative testing revealed limited proportions of abnormal findings among patients with elective surgical procedures. Routine ordering of many preoperative investigations without specifications may not predict postoperative complications of the patients. Therefore, undertaking preoperative testing should be guided by targeted history, physical examination, clinical risk factors, and type of surgical procedure intended to be performed.

3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 37: 211-215, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28704748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast Angiosarcoma is a rare type of malignancy arising from endothelial cells lining blood vessels, accounting for 1% of all soft tissue breast tumors. This retrospective study describes the clinical pathological features and clinical management and outcomes of a series of 5 patients with primary and secondary Angiosarcoma of the breast present to King Faisal Specialty Hospital and Research Center during the last 16 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institution's pathology database was conducted and all patients who had a pathologically confirmed breast angiosarcoma were included in this study. The patient's data, including demographic characteristics, pathological features, clinical management history and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with Breast Angiosarcoma (one secondary and four primary cases). The median age of patients with primary angiosarcoma was 22 years (range 13-25 years). All primary cases were presented late as post-excisional biopsy at local hospitals. Median tumor size was 6cm (range 4.0-17.0cm). All primary angiosarcoma patients had total mastectomy. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with primary angiosarcoma was 25%. 5-year surviving rate of primary angiosarcoma was 50%. Recurrence was observed in three of the patients with primary Angiosarcoma and in the case of post irradiation Angiosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that Breast Angiosarcoma exhibits high recurrence and mortality rates. Early detection, small tumor size, and clear surgical margins seem to be crucial factors for survival. Mastectomy with adequate tumor margin is recommended and close long-term follow-up is of utmost importance. Surgery for local recurrence may be potentially curative.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...