Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
J Epidemiol Glob Health ; 14(2): 319-326, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in high-risk pediatric patients remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to characterize pediatric RSV cases from January 2019 to December 2022 and assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on RSV burden and RSV-related outcomes. In addition, examining factors influencing RSV-related hospitalization. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that included pediatric patients (aged 14 and below) who presented at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia with RSV infection identified using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA. RESULTS: A total of 885 RSV cases were reported; (56.05%) were males and (43.95%) were females with a median age of 24 months [interquartile range (IQR): 11-60]. 534 (60.34%) required hospitalization. As for RSV seasonality, there was a significant increase in RSV prevalence following the COVID-19 pandemic, escalating from 205 cases in 2019 to 425 cases in 2022. The increase in 2022 was evident in January and persisted from September to December, reaching its peak during the months of October (20.70% - 88 cases) and November (32.00% - 136 cases). About (27.12%) of RSV infected children were medically free patients. Symptomatic patients exhibited various clinical manifestations, with ventilation necessary in (13.11%) of cases. Further analysis revealed significant changes in RSV-related outcomes post-COVID-19, including a decrease in hospitalization rates, an increase in medically free patients, and a lower need for ventilation (p < 0.05). Notably, a significant proportion of RSV admissions occurred within the first 6 months of life, with (77.69%) in the age group of 0 to 5 months. In addition, previous RSV infection, prematurity, low birth weight, renal disease, congenital heart disease, endocrine/metabolic disease, neuro/neuromuscular diseases, and genetic disorders were positively associated with hospitalization (P < 0.05). Interestingly, asthma and bone marrow transplantation were negatively associated with hospitalization (P < 0.05). The mortality rate in this study is (2.37%) (21/885). CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the demographic and clinical factors influencing RSV outcomes, highlighting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and shedding light on potential risk factors for RSV-related hospitalization. The highest prevalence of RSV during (September to January), aligning with global patterns and emphasizing the importance of timing in preventive strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Prevalência , Recém-Nascido , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/isolamento & purificação , Pandemias
2.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(6): 961-966, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The actual burden of the Omicron variants remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the epidemiological and clinical features of Omicron-infected patients and investigate factors influencing hospital admission. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included individuals with positive SARS-CoV-2 infection, specifically the Omicron variants (XBB, EG or JN), identified through real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays from January 2022 to December 2023. RESULTS: A total of 305 Omicron-infected patients were included; (53.11 %) were females and (46.89 %) were males, with a median age of 39 years [interquartile range (IQR): 30, 53]. Underlying diseases, including endocrine/metabolic disorders (22.30 %), hypertension (12.79 %), chronic respiratory disease (10.49 %), and malignancy (9.18 %) were prevalent, while (40.98 %) were medically free. The XBB variant was predominant (73.11 %), followed by JN (20.33 %), and EG variant (6.56 %). The seasonality analysis demonstrates XBB variants' domination in 2022, with a surge to 40 cases in December. The trend continued in 2023, peaking at 76 XBB cases in March. May 2023 reported 38 XBB cases and the emergence of 17 EG instances. Notably, in December, only one XBB case was reported, and 62 instances emerged with the JN variant. Overall, 233 out of 305 cases were reported during flu season (September to March) (76.39 %). Moreover, hospitalization occurred in (16.39 %), with a (1.31 %) mortality rate (all deaths in the JN variant). Multivariable analysis confirmed renal disease, chronic respiratory disease, endocrine/metabolism issues, and polymicrobial infection as positive predictors of hospitalization (p < 0.05). While COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced hospitalization odds (Odds Ratio: 0.20, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute valuable insights into Omicron epidemiology and factors influencing hospitalization. The dynamic fluctuations in Omicron variants, particularly XBB, EG, and JN, over 2022 and 2023, with JN emerging as the dominant circulating variant globally, underscore the need for continuous vigilance and urgency for updated vaccine formulations.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Feminino , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Masculino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estações do Ano
3.
Cureus ; 15(8): e43412, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37706119

RESUMO

PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 virus was the culprit of the global pandemic that began in 2019. With alarming mortality rates reaching sky-high worldwide, the virus prompted the masses to switch to online working. However, this was not feasible for healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to a higher-than-normal risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection. This study aims to observe the prevalence of COVID-19 positivity among the various areas of a healthcare facility in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of positive employees among all departments at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, such as administration, capital projects/facilities, and healthcare. The study included all hospital employees-permanent staff, rotating physicians, and trainees-who tested positive for COVID-19 between March 20, 2020 and December 30, 2020. RESULTS: It was found that HCWs had the most significant number of infected individuals with nursing staff being the predominant demographic. This was followed by the capital projects/facilities departments, of which the environmental services staff were the most infected. CONCLUSION: It is pertinent that strict protocols be taken by hospital management to limit the spread of future infectious diseases within hospital settings. This includes the provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) and adequate education on its proper usage, alongside regular surveillance of staff with regard to adherence and early detection of symptoms.

4.
Cureus ; 15(7): e41919, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37583740

RESUMO

Introduction As of May 2023, the end of the pandemic, the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases reached more than 841,000 cases. Healthcare workers (HCWs) especially have been at the frontline during this pandemic and are at a higher chance of contracting COVID-19. Approximately half of all high-risk exposures were to healthcare personnel with COVID-19. While several tools for contact tracing were developed for the general public, contact tracing for infectious diseases in the healthcare setting is limited, and global testing of HCWs, or in-hospital digital tracing, is not performed in most facilities. The King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC) collaborated with the Infection Control and Health Information Technology Affairs (HITA) to create an automated COVID-19 contact tracing tool specifically for HCWs who worked at the institute. This study aims to describe the contact tracing experience at KFSH&RC. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to describe the use of an automated tool that was developed to assist in the contact tracing process and that was to be used by KFSH&RC employees who had been in contact with a COVID-19-positive individual. This tool is utilized for the early identification of possible COVID-19 cases and risk stratification of the exposed individuals. The tool can be accessed through the KFSH&RC website; it also collects information about the COVID-19 exposure rate among the different departments such as administration, capital projects/facilities, and healthcare at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Results The tool has been utilized 7,353 times by contact cases. Approximately 7% of those tested later developed a COVID-19 infection. When assessing the positivity rates per department, The Environmental Services Department had the highest positivity rate of 28.21%, followed by Health Information Technology and Analytics (HITA), and then the Central Transportation Department. Conclusion This study acts as the first of its kind to describe the successful use of the healthcare contact tracing system in one of Saudi Arabia's largest hospitals (KFSH&RC) and describe the infection trends in different departments of the hospital. Through the tracing system, the departments with the highest COVID-19 infection occurrences at the hospital were identified in a timely manner, and safety protocols were implemented.

5.
Eur J Med Genet ; 65(11): 104602, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049607

RESUMO

Patients with certain inherited metabolic disorders (IMD) are at high risk for metabolic decompensation with exposure to infections. The COVID-19 pandemic has been particularly challenging for health care providers dealing with IMD patients, in view of its unpredictable consequences in these patients. There is limited data in literature on evaluating the impact and the outcome of COVID-19 infection in these patients. This cross-sectional retrospective study on a large cohort of unvaccinated IMD patients, reviewed the incidence of COVID-19 infection, disease manifestation and outcome during the pandemic between November 2019 and July 2021. In this cohort of 1058 patients, 11.7% (n = 124) were infected with COVID-19. Their median age was 16 years (age range 2-42); 57% (n = 71) were males. Post-exposure positive test was noted in 78% (n = 97) patients, while 19% (n = 24) had symptomatic diagnosis and three patients tested positive during pre-hospital visits screening. Most patients, 68.5% (n = 85) had mild COVID-19 related symptoms such as fever, cough, headache and diarrhea while 13.7% (n = 17) patients had no symptoms. Of twenty-two patients (17.7%) who required hospitalization, 16 were adults with various intoxication and energy metabolism disorders, who developed IMD related complications such as metabolic acidosis, hyperammonemia, acute pancreatitis, hypoglycemia, rhabdomyolysis and thrombosis. Ten patients needed intensive care management. The cohort death rate was 2.4% (3 patients). Overall, the clinical course of COVID-19 infection in these IMD patients was relatively mild except for patients with intoxication and energy metabolism disorders who had high risk of developing acute metabolic decompensation with severe complications.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Metabólicas , Pancreatite , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/complicações , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Metabólicas/complicações , Doenças Metabólicas/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/complicações , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem
6.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 9(3): 153-159, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35664238

RESUMO

Background: Since the initial emergence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus responsible for the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many studies have been exploring the nature and characteristics of this virus and its associated clinical manifestations. The present study aimed to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 infections in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review of findings associated with 143 pediatric patients (age <14 years) with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who had undergone inpatient or outpatient treatment at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between March 2020 and October 2020, was conducted. The analyzed data included patient demographic information, pre-existing medical conditions, symptoms, interventions, and outcomes. Results: The median age of this patient population was 7 years. Of these 143 patients, 67 (46.8%) had known pre-existing medical conditions including bronchial asthma (12.8%), chronic lung disease (CLD) (3%), congenital heart disease (CHD) (17%), primary immunodeficiencies (1.5%), malignancies (9.8%), and 7.5% were post-transplant patients. Thirty-seven patients (26%) were overweight or obese. Sixty-three of these patients (51%) were symptomatic, with the most common symptom being fever (55%). Ultimately, 45 patients (31%) required admission to the hospital, with a median duration of hospitalization of 9.6 days for admitted patients. There were no documented cases of infection-related mortality among this pediatric cohort, although 11 patients experienced post-infectious complications that primarily manifested as a loss of taste and smell. Conclusion: These findings suggest that pediatric COVID-19 patients tend to experience mild forms of the disease, without any significant differences in disease severity as a function of patient gender or immune status.

7.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 38(7): 731-734, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31192978

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal bacterial sepsis and meningitis globally. Studies concerning the incidence and burden of neonatal GBS disease in Saudi Arabia are lacking. This study determined the incidence and burden of GBS infection among neonates in association with maternal GBS screening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort chart review study included all neonatal GBS disease cases identified through microbiology lab records within the first 90 days of life in the hospital from January 2004 to December 2016. Charts were reviewed to collect maternal and neonatal characteristics using a standardized form. RESULTS: Over 13 years, of 108,609 live births, 55 GBS disease cases were identified (overall incidence, 0.51/1000 live births), 69.1% (n = 38) of those had early onset disease (EOD). The annual incidence in 2015 and 2016 was significantly higher than in any previous year (P < 0.0001), coinciding with the discontinuation of routine universal maternal GBS screening. Median age at presentation was 1 day (range, 0-54 days). We found that 67.3% (n = 37) of mothers were not screened antenatally, 72.9% (n = 27) of whom had neonates present with EOD. Neonates of unscreened mothers were more likely to have GBS disease (P = 0.01) and to present with EOD (P = 0.005). Urinary tract infection was the most common manifestation (47.3%, n = 26), followed by sepsis (43.6%, n = 24). Mortality rate was 3.6% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of neonatal GBS infection in Saudi Arabia is similar to the worldwide incidence. Universal antenatal screening discontinuation was significantly associated with an increase in EOD incidence.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Centros de Atenção Terciária
8.
J Infect Public Health ; 12(1): 90-94, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279098

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary childhood nephrotic syndrome (PCNS) develop alterations in their cellular and humoral immunity that predisposes them to the development of infection, and lead them to have frequent relapses. Also, infection could be significantly enhanced by immunosuppressive agents. This study aims to estimate the immunosuppressive burden, rate of infection and identify possible risk factors in PCNS requiring hospitalization. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study of hospitalized children≤14years of age diagnosed with PCNS in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Riyadh from January 2003 to December 2013. RESULT: Out of 111 patients admitted with PCNS, 84 (76%) had both minor and major types of infection. Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) was the most predominant type (n=44, 52%). Among the major types of infection, urinary tract infection (UTI) was the most common infection (n=21, 25%) followed by pneumonia (n=17, 20%) then cellulitis (n=6, 6%). Infection in children who received a higher annual cumulative dose of steroids (CDS) strikingly had a higher rate of infection in comparison to those who received lower CDS (p<0.01). Moreover, those who received primary and secondary immunosuppressant's had 100% infection rate. CONCLUSION: About half of infection encountered by PCNS patients were URTI followed by UTI and pneumonia. Higher annual CDS, combination of primary and secondary immunosuppressants were the highest independent risk factors for infection. Among the infection, URTI was considered as the predominant entity whereas among the major infection, UTI was predominant followed by pneumonia then cellulitis.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Nefrótica/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Adolescente , Celulite (Flegmão)/epidemiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Nefrótica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Nefrótica/imunologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(8): 930-935, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30072161

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although direct human observation of hand hygiene (HH) is considered the gold standard for measuring HH compliance, its accuracy is challenged by the Hawthorne effect. OBJECTIVES: To compare HH compliance using both overt and covert methods of direct observation in different professional categories, hospital settings, and HH indications. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 28 units at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between October 2012 and July 2013. Compliance was defined as performing handrubbing or handwashing during 1 of the World Health Organization 5 Moments for HH indications (ie, opportunities). Overt observation was done by infection preventionists (IPs) who were doing their routine HH observation. Covert observation was done by unrecognized temporarily hired professionally trained observers. RESULTS: A total of 15,883 opportunities were observed using overt observation and 7,040 opportunities were observed using covert observation. Overall HH compliance was 87.1% versus 44.9% using overt/covert observations, respectively (risk ratio, 1.94; P < .001). The significant overestimation was seen across all professional categories, hospital settings, and HH indications. CONCLUSION: There is a considerable difference in HH compliance being observed overtly and covertly in all categories. More work is required to improve the methodology of direct observation to minimize the influence of the Hawthorne effect.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Higiene das Mãos/métodos , Observação/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , Humanos , Arábia Saudita , Centros de Atenção Terciária
10.
J Infect Public Health ; 11(4): 491-499, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28988776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine hesitancy is a major problem worldwide, with significant public health consequences. We aimed to determine the prevalence of influenza vaccine hesitancy and the effect of vaccine awareness campaigns on vaccine acceptance among three groups (parents, adult patients, and healthcare workers [HCWs]) at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: The study was conducted during the 2015-2016 winter season. Participants anonymously completed a validated questionnaire on influenza vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Of the 300 study participants, 17% (n=51) expressed vaccine hesitancy. The most common reasons given for vaccine refusal were: "It doesn't have any positive effect or benefit" (n=11 [21%]), "I don't need it because I'm healthy" (n=9 [17%]), and "I think it causes serious side effects" (n=7 [13%]). The most common sources of information about the vaccine were awareness campaigns (98/267 [36%]) and medical staff (98/267 [36%]). One hundred and sixty-three [54%] respondents knew that the effect of the influenza vaccine lasts up to 1year. There was no significant relationship between education level and receiving influenza vaccination. The study showed that confidence towards the Saudi Ministry of Health and medical doctors among three groups of participants was very high; 97% of adults, 95% of parents, and 93% of HCWs expressed trusted information provided to them by the Ministry of Health, and 97% of adults, 99% of parents, and 90% of HCWs trusted their physicians' information. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccine hesitancy was low at KAMC. The most common reason for vaccine refusal was believing that it had no positive effect and that it is unnecessary. The most common sources of information for influenza vaccine were awareness campaigns and medical staff. Participants had high levels of trust in both the Saudi Ministry of Health and doctors.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Recusa de Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Prevalência , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Inquéritos e Questionários , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Confiança , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Avicenna J Med ; 4(3): 58-65, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24982826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of combining oral dexamethasone with either nebulized racemic epinephrine or salbutamol compared to bronchodilators alone for the treatment of infants with bronchiolitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial on infants (1 to 12 months) who were diagnosed in the emergency department with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis. The primary outcome was the rate of hospital admission within 7 days of the first dose of treatment, and the secondary outcomes were changes in respiratory distress assessment instrument score, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation (O2 Sat) over a 4-hour observation period. Infants (n = 162) were randomly assigned to four groups: A (dexamethasone + racemic epinephrine) = 45, B (placebo and racemic epinephrine) =39, C (dexamethasone and salbutamol) = 40, or D (placebo and salbutamol) = 38. RESULTS: Patients who had received dexamethasone + epinephrine exhibited similar admission rates compared to placebo + epinephrine or salbutamol (P = 0.64). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of hospitalization for patients who received dexamethasone + salbutamol compared to those who received placebo + epinephrine or salbutamol (P = 0.51). Clinical parameters were improved at the end of the 4-hour observation period for all treatment groups. Treatment with dexamethasone + epinephrine resulted in a statistically significant change in HR over time (P < 0.005) compared to the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to a body of evidence suggesting that corticosteroids have no role in the management of bronchiolitis for young infants who are first time wheezers with no risk of atopy.

12.
Ann Saudi Med ; 33(4): 392-3, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750771

RESUMO

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is a bacterial pathogen that causes invasive infections, including septicemia and meningitis, as well as noninvasive infections such as community-acquired pneumonia, sinusitis and acute otitis media. Vaccination with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) has significantly reduced the burden of pneumococcal disease; however it targets only seven of the more than 92 pneumococcal serotypes. Concerns have been raised that nonvaccine serotypes could increase in prevalence and reduce the benefits of vaccination. We report one case with invasive nonvaccine serotype 25 that presented with meningitis.


Assuntos
Meningite Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
13.
Indian J Clin Biochem ; 27(2): 141-6, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23542765

RESUMO

Reference intervals for pubertal characteristics are influenced by genetic, geographic, dietary and socioeconomic factors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish age-specific reference intervals of glucose and lipid levels among local school children. This was cross-sectional study, conducted among Saudi school children. Fasting blood samples were collected from 2149 children, 1138 (53%) boys and 1011 (47%) girls, aged 6 to 18 years old. Samples were analyzed on the Architect c8000 Chemistry System (Abbott Diagnostics, USA) for glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL. Reference intervals were established by nonparametric methods between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. Significant differences were observed between boys and girls for cholesterol and triglycerides levels in all age groups (P < 0.02). Only at age 6-7 years and at adolescents, HDL and LDL levels were found to be significant (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in glucose levels except at age 12 to 13 years. Saudi children have comparable serum cholesterol levels than their Western counterparts. This may reflect changing dietary habits and increasing affluence in Saudi Arabia. Increased lipid screening is anticipated, and these reference intervals will aid in the early assessment of cardiovascular and diabetes risk in Saudi pediatric populations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA