RESUMO
PURPOSE: The DEGRO Expert Commission on Prostate Cancer has revised the indication for radiation therapy of the primary prostate tumor in patients with synchronous distant metastases with low metastatic burden. METHODS: The current literature in the PubMed database was reviewed regarding randomized evidence on radiotherapy of the primary prostate tumor with synchronous low metastatic burden. RESULTS: In total, two randomized trials were identified. The larger study, the STAMPEDE trial, demonstrated an absolute survival benefit of 8% after 3 years for patients with low metastatic burden treated with standard of care (SOC) and additional radiotherapy (RT) (EQD2 ≤â¯72â¯Gy) of the primary tumor. Differences in the smaller Horrad trial were not statistically significant, although risk reduction in the subgroup (<â¯5 bone metastases) was equal to STAMPEDE. The STOPCAP meta-analysis of both trials demonstrated the benefit of local radiotherapy for up to 4 bone lesions and an additional subanalysis of STAMPEDE also substantiated this finding in cases with M1a-only metastases. CONCLUSION: Therefore, due to the survival benefit after 3 years, current practice is changing. New palliative SOC is radiotherapy of the primary tumor in synchronously metastasized prostate cancer with low metastatic burden (defined as ≤â¯4 bone metastases, with or without distant nodes) or in case of distant nodes only detected by conventional imaging.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Hormônios , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate toxicity, oncological and functional outcome, and quality of life after salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy. METHODS: A total of 13 patients undergoing salvage radiotherapy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer recurrence after HIFU therapy were included and followed up every 3 months. Oncological outcome (by PSA measurements), toxicity (according to CTCAE criteria), and functional outcome were evaluated. Quality of life was assessed by standardized questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months after salvage treatment. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 80 years (interquartile range [IQR] 75-82). Patients underwent normofractionated salvage radiotherapy with median 73.6 Gy. PSA nadir was reached at 6 months and was 0.2 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 76 months (IQR 55-96). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 3 patients (23.1%) at a median of 36.4 months. No gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity ≥ grade 3 was noted during follow-up. Early and late grade II GI toxicity occurred in 1 patient (7.7%), respectively. GU toxicity grade II was noted in up to 53.8% at 3 months and 61.5% at 12 months. In terms of health-related quality of life, there was no statistically significant difference at 3 and 12 months compared to the baseline. Only differences were seen in sexual functioning (3 and 12 months) and in diarrhea (3 months), affecting patients' wellbeing. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Salvage radiotherapy after HIFU treatment can be performed safely, thereby providing acceptable recurrence-free survival without severe impact on post-interventional quality of life.
Assuntos
Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Terapia de Salvação/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Various randomized phase III clinical trials have compared moderately hypofractionated to normofractionated radiotherapy (RT). These modalities showed similar effectiveness without major differences in toxicity. This project was conducted by the Prostate Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and the Working Party on Radiation Oncology of the German Cancer Society. We aimed to investigate expert opinions on the use of moderately hypofractionated RT as a definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer in German-speaking countries. METHODS: A 25-item, web-based questionnaire on moderate-hypofractionation RT was prepared by an internal committee. The experts of the DEGRO were asked to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Fourteen active members of DEGRO completed the questionnaire. The questions described indications for selecting patients eligible to receive moderate hypofractionation based on clinical and pathological factors such as age, urinary symptoms, and risk-group. The questions also collected information on the technical aspects of selection criteria, including the definition of a clinical target volume, the use of imaging, protocols for bladder and rectal filling, the choice of a fractionation schedule, and the use of image guidance. Moreover, the questionnaire collected information on post-treatment surveillance after applying moderately hypofractionated RT. CONCLUSION: Although opinions varied on the use of moderate-hypofractionation RT, the current survey reflected broad agreement on the notion that moderately hypofractionated RT could be considered a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in German-speaking countries.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Due to its low fractionation sensitivity, also known as "alpha/beta ratio," in relation to its surrounding organs at risk, prostate cancer is predestined for hypofractionated radiation schedules assuming an increased therapeutic ratio compared to normofractionated regimens. While moderate hypofractionation (2.2-4â¯Gy) has been proven to be non-inferior to normal fractionation in several large randomized trials for localized prostate cancer, level I evidence for ultrahypofractionation (>4â¯Gy) was lacking until recently. An accumulating body of non-randomized evidence has recently been strengthened by the publication of two randomized studies comparing ultrahypofractionation with a normofractionated schedule, i.e., the Scandinavian HYPO-RT trial by Widmark et al. and the first toxicity results of the PACEB trial. In this review, we aim to give a brief overview of the current evidence of ultrahypofractionation, make an overall assessment of the level of evidence, and provide recommendations and requirements that should be followed before introducing ultrahypofractionation into routine clinical use.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: To provide an overview on the available treatments to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel summarized available evidence published and assessed the validity of the information on efficacy and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials and one meta-analysis were identified. Two randomized trials demonstrated that prophylactic radiation therapy (RT) using 1â¯× 10â¯Gy or 2â¯× 6â¯Gy significantly reduced the rate of gynecomastia but not breast pain, as compared to observation. A randomized dose-finding trial identified the daily dose of 20â¯mg tamoxifen (TMX) as the most effective prophylactic dose and another randomized trial described that daily TMX use was superior to weekly use. Another randomized trial showed that prophylactic daily TMX is more effective than TMX given at the onset of gynecomastia. Two other randomized trials described that TMX was clearly superior to anastrozole in reducing the risk for gynecomastia and/or breast pain. One comparative randomized trial between prophylactic RT using 1â¯× 12â¯Gy and TMX concluded that prophylactic TMX is more effective compared to prophylactic RT and furthermore that TMX appears to be more effective to treat gynecomastia and/or breast pain when symptoms are already present. A meta-analysis confirmed that both prophylactic RT and TMX can reduce the risk of gynecomastia and/or breast pain with TMX being more effective; however, the rate of side effects after TMX including dizziness and hot flushes might be higher than after RT and must be taken into account. Less is known regarding the comparative effectiveness of different radiation fractionation schedules and more modern RT techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic RT as well as daily TMX can significantly reduce the incidence of gynecomastia and/or breast pain. TMX appears to be an effective alternative to RT also as a therapeutic treatment in the presence of gynecomastia but its side effects and off-label use must be considered.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Androgênios , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Moduladores de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Ginecomastia/induzido quimicamente , Mastodinia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Anastrozol/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Tontura/induzido quimicamente , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Esquema de Medicação , Moduladores de Receptor Estrogênico/administração & dosagem , Moduladores de Receptor Estrogênico/efeitos adversos , Rubor/induzido quimicamente , Ginecomastia/tratamento farmacológico , Ginecomastia/prevenção & controle , Ginecomastia/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Mastodinia/tratamento farmacológico , Mastodinia/prevenção & controle , Mastodinia/radioterapia , Metanálise como Assunto , Nitrilas/efeitos adversos , Uso Off-Label , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Tosil/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This article aims to provide an overview of the role of combined radiation and androgen deprivation (ADT) therapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current German, European, and NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines as well as relevant literature in the PubMed database which provide information on sub-classification within the intermediate-risk group and the use of ADT in terms of oncological outcome were reviewed. RESULTS: Different recommendations for risk-group assessment of patients with localized prostate cancer are available. Subdivision of intermediate risk into a favorable and an unfavorable group seems to be justified to allow for a more individualized therapy in a quite heterogenous group of patients. So far, multiple randomized trials have shown a benefit when radiation therapy (RT) is combined with ADT. The use of dose-escalated RT without ADT also appears to be an adequate therapy associated with a very low rate of cancer-specific deaths. Therefore, taking into account the increased rate of toxicity associated with ADT, dose-escalated RT alone might be justified, especially in favorable intermediate-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Dose-escalated RT alone appears to be an appropriate treatment in favorable intermediate-risk patients. Addition of short course ADT (4-6 months) might improve outcomes in unfavorable intermediate-risk patients.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina de Precisão , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
AIM: Overview on the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) added to salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. METHODS: The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel summarized available evidence published between January 2009 and May 2017, and assessed the validity of the information on outcome parameters including overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and nine relevant retrospective analyses were identified. The RTOG 9601 trial showed an OS improvement for the combination of 2 years of bicalutamide and SRT compared to SRT alone after a median follow-up of 13 years. This improvement appeared to be restricted to those patients with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level before SRT of ≥0.7â¯ng/mL. The GETUG AFU-16 trial showed that after a median follow-up of 5 years, the addition of 6 months of goserelin to SRT improved progression-free survival (PFS; based on biochemical recurrence) as compared to SRT alone. ADT in both trials was not associated with increased major late toxicities. Results of retrospective series were inconsistent with a suggestion that the addition of ADT improved biochemical PFS especially in patients with high-risk factors such as Gleason Score ≥8 and in the group with initially negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: ADT combined with SRT appears to improve OS in patients with a PSA level before SRT of ≥0.7â¯ng/mL. In patients without persistent PSA after prostatectomy and PSA levels of <0.7â¯ng/mL, ADT should not routinely be used, but may be considered in patients with additional risk factors such as Gleason Score ≥8 and negative surgical margins.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia de Salvação , Terapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
AIM: This article gives an overview on the current status of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer with a special focus on the applicability in routine use. METHODS: Based on a recently published systematic review the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel added additional information that has become available since then and assessed the validity of the information on outcome parameters especially with respect to long-term toxicity and long-term disease control. RESULTS: Several large-scale trials on moderate hypofractionation with single doses from 2.4-3.4 Gy have recently finished recruiting or have published first results suggestive of equivalent outcomes although there might be a trend for increased short-term and possibly even long-term toxicity. Large phase 3 trials on extreme hypofractionation with single doses above 4.0 Gy are lacking and only very few prospective trials have follow-up periods covering more than just 2-3 years. CONCLUSION: Until the results on long-term follow-up of several well-designed phase 3 trials become available, moderate hypofractionation should not be used in routine practice without special precautions and without adherence to the highest quality standards and evidence-based dose fractionation regimens. Extreme hypofractionation should be restricted to prospective clinical trials.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia Conformacional/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Malignant ectomesenchymoma is a rare tumour that contains both ectodermal and mesenchymal elements. Only three patients with a manifestation in the cerebrum and clinicopathological data have been reported until now. We present a patient with an intracerebral ectomesenchymoma, review the literature and discuss currently available therapeutic options. In a 10-year-old girl, a left suprasellar temporo-parieto-occipitally localised tumour was diagnosed. The tumour was completely excised macroscopically in two surgical sessions. For the mesenchymal part of the tumour she subsequently underwent multidrug chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. Considering the neuroectodermal element of the tumour, radiotherapy was applied to the craniospinal axis with a local boost. Therapy was tolerated well without any severe side effects. Six years from diagnosis, the patient is alive without a tumour relapse. CONCLUSION: Due to the sparcity of reported cases with malignant ectomesenchymoma, the role of adjuvant therapy is unclear. Multimodal therapy may be able to improve outcome.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Córtex Cerebral , Mesenquimoma , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Criança , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Mesenquimoma/patologia , Mesenquimoma/terapia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos/patologia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary intraspinal primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) is a very rare tumor entity. The optimal therapeutic approach is not known yet. We report on two women with primary intraspinal PNETs and review the literature. We describe the typical course of the disease, compare our patients to the other 17 cases reported until today, and discuss therapeutic options. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Case A: In a 49-year-old woman with an intraspinal PNET at L2, laminectomy and a gross tumor removal was accomplished. Postoperative radiation was performed from T12 to L3 to a dose of 50.4 Gy. Subsequently she was treated with chemotherapy containing vincristine, cisplatinum and lomustine. Case B: A 29-year-old woman presented with intramedullary PNET lesions at T1-3 and T10-11. Due to the multifocal location, she received a primary craniospinal axis irradiation to a dose of 35.2 Gy plus a boost to the tumor region to a total dose of 53.2 Gy. RESULTS: Both patients developed multilocular intraspinal relapses with meningeosis neoplastica 17 and 6 months from radiation therapy and underwent palliative chemotherapy. Case A died 23 months, case B 17 months after primary diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Despite modern treatment with microsurgery, irradiation and chemotherapy in primary intraspinal PNETs, local relapse or dissemination in most cases lead to death within a few months. An improvement of treatment outcome can only be achieved by intensification through multidisciplinary treatment.
Assuntos
Bulbo/patologia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos Periféricos/patologia , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/patologia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Bulbo/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos Periféricos/terapia , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
PURPOSE: High-dose therapy (HDT) is currently under investigation for patients with advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We report on the toxicity of a modified HDT that combines total-body irradiation (TBI) with involved-field irradiation (IF-RT) for patients with bulky disease or residual lymphomas > 2 cm after induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 41 patients received HDT which consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide and fractionated TBI (6 x 2 Gy) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Eleven patients received IF-RT prior to TBI, three patients had already received another radiotherapy treatment prior to HDT. RESULTS: After a medium follow-up of 19 months we observed an overall survival rate of 100%, and a relapse-free survival rate of 78%. Severe toxicity was observed only in one patient who developed a myelodysplastic syndrome, and another patient who showed signs of pneumonitis. About two thirds of the patients claimed minor toxicity of grade I-II according the LENT-SOMA scale, predominantly as a decrease in concentration, reduced sexual functioning, and musculo-skeletal pain. Correspondingly, laboratory tests showed grade I-II changes of blood counts, liver enzymes, hormone levels, and lung function. There was no excess toxicity in the patients who received IF-RT additional to TBI. CONCLUSIONS: HDT including TBI and prior IF-RT is feasible without excess morbidity. Careful follow-up is required to detect myelodysplastic syndrome or endocrine changes of ovarian or testicular function.