New insights into the characterization of the mechanism of action of hyoscine butylbromide in the human colon ex vivo.

INTRODUCTION: Hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) is one of the most used antispasmodics in clinical practice. Recent translational consensus has demonstrated a similarity between human colonic motor patterns studied ex vivo and in vivo, suggesting ex vivo can predict in vivo results. It is unclear whether the mechanism of action of antispasmodics can predict different use in clinical practice. The aim of the present study is to bridge this gap dissecting HBB's role in excitatory and inhibitory neural pathways. METHODS: 309 colon samples from 48 patients were studied in muscle bath experiments. HBB was tested on: 1-spontaneous phasic contractions (SPCs); 2-carbachol-induced contractility; electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced selective stimulation of 3-excitatory and 4-inhibitory pathways and 5- SPCs and EFS-induced contractions enhanced by neostigmine. Atropine, AF-DX116 (M2 blocker) and DAU-5884 (M3 blocker) were used as comparators. RESULTS: In the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX), HBB and atropine 1 µM reduced SPCs. HBB and atropine concentration-dependently reduced carbachol- and EFS-induced contractions. Inhibitory effects of DAU-5884 on EFS-induced contractions were more potent than of AF-DX116. HBB did not affect the off-response associated to neural inhibitory responses. Neostigmine enhanced both SPCs and EFS-induced contractions. In the presence of TTX and ω-conotoxin (GVIA), neostigmine still enhanced SPCs. Addition of HBB and atropine reduced these responses. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that HBB inhibits neural cholinergic contractions associated to muscarinic (mainly M3) receptors. HBB has a potential role in reducing colonic spasm induced by the release of acetylcholine from enteric motor neurons and from an atypical source including a potential non-neuronal origin.

Current insights on chronic intestinal dysmotility: pseudo-obstruction and enteric dysmotility.

Chronic intestinal dysmotility is a rare and debilitating digestive disorder characterized by symptoms of mechanical obstruction without an organic lesion. It has diverse causes and involves various pathological mechanisms. Small bowel manometry is the preferred diagnostic method, particularly for patients with severe and progressive symptoms. The condition can be categorized as intestinal pseudo-obstruction and enteric dysmotility, both entities share abnormal small bowel motility, but with important differences in prognosis and management.

Distinctive gastrointestinal motor dysfunction in patients with MNGIE.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathy (MNGIE) is a rare mitochondrial disease caused by mutations in TYMP, encoding thymidine phosphorylase. Clinically it is characterized by severe gastrointestinal dysmotility associated with cachexia and a demyelinating sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Even though digestive manifestations are progressive and invariably lead to death, the features of gastrointestinal motor dysfunction have not been systematically evaluated. The objective of this study was to describe gastrointestinal motor dysfunction in MNGIE using state-of-the art techniques and to evaluate the relationship between motor abnormalities and symptoms. METHODS: Prospective study evaluating gastrointestinal motor function and digestive symptoms in all patients with MNGIE attended at a national referral center in Spain between January 2018 and July 2022. KEY RESULTS: In this period, five patients diagnosed of MNGIE (age range 16-46 years, four men) were evaluated. Esophageal motility by high-resolution manometry was abnormal in four patients (two hypoperistalsis, two aperistalsis). Gastric emptying by scintigraphy was mildly delayed in four and indicative of gastroparesis in one. In all patients, small bowel high-resolution manometry exhibited a common, distinctive dysmotility pattern, characterized by repetitive bursts of spasmodic contractions, without traces of normal fasting and postprandial motility patterns. Interestingly, objective motor dysfunctions were detected in the absence of severe digestive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: MNGIE patients exhibit a characteristic motor dysfunction, particularly of the small bowel, even in patients with mild digestive symptoms and in the absence of morphological signs of intestinal failure. Since symptoms are not predictive of objective findings, early investigation is indicated.

Underlying etiology associated with the diagnosis of absent contractility on high resolution esophageal manometry / Etiologías subyacentes asociadas al diagnóstico de contractilidad ausente en la manometría esofágica de alta resolución

Background/Aims: Absent contractility is considered a disorder of peristalsis. The literature about the etiology and clinical characteristics is scarce and the evidence on systemic diseases associated with this esophageal disorder is limited. Therefore, we aimed to determine the etiology of absent contractility in our population using the clinical algorithm recently described in the literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study at a single tertiary hospital of all patients diagnosed of absent contractility between May 2018 and February 2020. Data on demographic characteristics, medication, comorbidities, and laboratory and paraclinical tests were recorded from clinical records. Results: A total of 72 patients with absent contractility were included for analysis. There was a predominance of female sex (n=43, 59.7%), with a mean age of 55.4 (±15.0) years. We identified a systemic disorder associated with absent contractility in 64 (88.9%) patients. From these, 31 (43.1%) patients were diagnosed with a systemic autoimmune disease, 26 (36.1%) patients were considered to have absent contractility secondary to pathological exposure to acid-reflux and 15 (20.8%) patients were diagnosed with other non-autoimmune systemic disorders. In the remaining eight (11.1%) patients, there were no underlying systemic disorders that could justify the diagnosis of absent contractility. Conclusions: A systematic approach to search for an underlying cause in patients diagnosed with absent contractility is warranted. Up to 90% of patients with absent contractility have a systemic disorder associated with this condition.(AU)

Antecedentes: La contractilidad ausente se considera un trastorno de la peristalsis esofágica. La literatura que existe sobre la etiología y las características clínicas es escasa y la evidencia sobre enfermedades sistémicas asociadas a este trastorno esofágico es limitada. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la etiología de la contractilidad ausente en nuestra población utilizando el algoritmo clínico recientemente descrito en la literatura. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en un hospital terciario de todos los pacientes diagnosticados de ausencia de contractilidad entre mayo de 2018 y febrero de 2020. Se recogieron datos de características demográficas, medicación, comorbilidades y pruebas de laboratorio y estudios paraclínicos. Resultados: Se incluyeron para el análisis un total de 72 pacientes con ausencia de contractilidad. Predominó el sexo femenino (n=43, 59,7%), con una edad media de 55,4 (±15,0) años. Identificamos un trastorno sistémico asociado con la ausencia de contractilidad en 64 (88,9%) pacientes. De estos 31 (43,1%) pacientes fueron diagnosticados de una enfermedad autoinmune sistémica, 26 (36,1%) pacientes se consideraron con ausencia de contractilidad secundaria a exposición patológica al reflujo ácido y 15 (20,8%) fueron diagnosticados con otras enfermedades no autoinmunes sistémicas. En los 8 pacientes restantes (11,1%) no hubo trastornos sistémicos subyacentes que pudieran justificar el diagnóstico de contractilidad ausente. Conclusiones: Un enfoque sistemático está justificado para investigar una causa subyacente en pacientes diagnosticados de contractilidad ausente. Hasta el 90% de los pacientes con contractilidad ausente tienen un trastorno sistémico asociado con esta afectación de la motilidad esofágica.(AU)

Underlying etiology associated with the diagnosis of absent contractility on high resolution esophageal manometry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Absent contractility is considered a disorder of peristalsis. The literature about the etiology and clinical characteristics is scarce and the evidence on systemic diseases associated with this esophageal disorder is limited. Therefore, we aimed to determine the etiology of absent contractility in our population using the clinical algorithm recently described in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study at a single tertiary hospital of all patients diagnosed of absent contractility between May 2018 and February 2020. Data on demographic characteristics, medication, comorbidities, and laboratory and paraclinical tests were recorded from clinical records. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with absent contractility were included for analysis. There was a predominance of female sex (n=43, 59.7%), with a mean age of 55.4 (±15.0) years. We identified a systemic disorder associated with absent contractility in 64 (88.9%) patients. From these, 31 (43.1%) patients were diagnosed with a systemic autoimmune disease, 26 (36.1%) patients were considered to have absent contractility secondary to pathological exposure to acid-reflux and 15 (20.8%) patients were diagnosed with other non-autoimmune systemic disorders. In the remaining eight (11.1%) patients, there were no underlying systemic disorders that could justify the diagnosis of absent contractility. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to search for an underlying cause in patients diagnosed with absent contractility is warranted. Up to 90% of patients with absent contractility have a systemic disorder associated with this condition.

Clinical significance of small bowel manometry patterns suggestive of intestinal obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Minute rhythm and prolonged simultaneous contractions are patterns of postprandial small bowel contractile activity that historically have been considered as suggestive of mechanical intestinal obstruction; however, these patterns have been also encountered in patients with motility-like symptoms in the absence of bowel obstruction. The objective of this study was to determine the current diagnostic outcome of patients with these intestinal manometry patterns. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with chronic digestive symptoms evaluated by intestinal manometry at our center between 2010 and 2018. RESULTS: The minute rhythm (MRP) or prolonged simultaneous contractions (PSC) postprandial patterns were detected in 61 of 488 patients (55 MRP and 6 PSC). Clinical work-up detected a previously non-diagnosed partial mechanical obstruction of the distal intestine in 10 (16%) and a systemic disorder causing intestinal neuropathy in 32 (53%). In the remaining 19 patients (31%, all with MRP), the origin of the contractile pattern was undetermined, but in 16, substantial fecal retention was detected within 7 days of the manometric procedure by abdominal imaging, and in 6 of them colonic cleansing completely normalized intestinal motility on a second manometry performed within 39 ± 30 days. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCE: Currently, the most frequent origin of MRP and PSC encountered on small bowel manometry is intestinal neuropathy, while a previously undetected mechanical obstruction is rare. Still, in a substantial proportion of patients, no underlying disease can be identified, and in them, colonic fecal retention might play a role, because in a subgroup of these patients, manometry normalized after colonic cleansing. Hence, colonic preparation may be considered prior to intestinal manometry.

Benefit of extending the protocol for high resolution manometry according to the version 4.0 of the Chicago criteria. A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The last version of the Chicago Criteria for high resolution esophageal manometry proposes an expanded protocol including complementary maneuvers to improve the diagnostic yield of the exploration. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic gain of the CCv4.0 protocol compared to the CCv3.0 protocol. METHODS: All manometry recordings performed in 4 reference centers during the first 10 months after the implementation of the new protocol were retrospectively reviewed. The time spent to complete the protocol was measured, and the changes in diagnosis resulting from the new CCv4.0 were compared to CCv3.0. KEY RESULTS: From a total of 756 HRM performed, 606 studies could be properly analyzed. The duration of the studies was 18.3 ± 4.3 min. From these, 11.3 ± 3.4 min were spent to complete the CCv3.0 protocol, and 7.4 ± 3.6 min were spent for the remaining maneuvers. A discordant diagnosis between CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 was obtained in 12% of patients: 32% of patients with ineffective esophageal motility turned to normal motility; 24% of patients with esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) turned to a non-obstructive disorder; and 1% of patients with an apparently normal EGJ relaxation, turned to an obstructive disorder. EGJOO according to CCv4.0 was more prevalent in patients referred for dysphagia (11%) than those referred for GERD (4%; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Prolongation of the time spent to complete the CCv4.0 protocol leads to a change in the diagnosis of 12% of patients. Clinically relevant changes are mainly related to the evaluation of EGJOO.

Evaluation of abdominal gas by plain abdominal radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the reliability of plain abdominal radiographs for the evaluation of abdominal gas content in patients with functional digestive symptoms. METHODS: Abdominal CT scan scout views, mimicking a conventional plain abdominal radiograph, were obtained from 30 patients both during episodes of abdominal distension and basal conditions. Physicians (n = 50) were instructed to rate the estimated volume of gas in the 60 images presented in random sequence using a scale graded from 0 to ≥600 ml. KEY RESULTS: The gas volumes estimated in the scout views differed from those measured by CT by a median of 90 (95% CI 70-102) ml, and the misestimation was not related to the absolute volume in the image. The accuracy of the observers, measured by their mean misestimation, was not related to their specialty or the training status (misestimation by 96 (95% CI 85-104) ml in staff vs 78 (70-106) ml in residents; p = 0.297). The accuracy was independent of the order of presentation of the images. Gas volume measured by CT in the images obtained during episodes of abdominal distension differed by a median of 39 (95% CI 29-66) ml from those during basal conditions, and this difference was misestimated by a median of 107 (95% CI 94-119) ml. The accuracy of these estimations was not related to the absolute gas volumes (R = -0.352; p < 0.001) or the magnitude of the differences. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Plain abdominal radiographs have limited value for the evaluation of abdominal gas volume in patients with functional gut disorders.

Severity of gastrointestinal bleeding is similar between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists

Background: gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a commonadverse event related to anticoagulation therapy. However,evidence comparing the severity, etiology and outcome ofGIB in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs.vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is scarce.Aim: to evaluate the severity, etiology and outcomes of GIBin patients under DOACs compared to VKA.Methods: patients under oral anticoagulant therapy admitted to the emergency department with acute GIB wereprospectively recruited from July 2016 to January 2018 ata tertiary referral hospital. Demographic and clinical out comes were obtained from medical records. GIB severitywas classified as mild, major, or severe according to theclinical presentation and type of support needed. Etiologyand location of bleeding, number of packed red blood cells(PRBC) transfused, and length of hospital stay were recorded until discharge or in-hospital death.Results: a total of 208 patients with acute GIB under oralanticoagulant treatment were recruited: 119 patients wereon VKA and 89 patients on DOAC, with similar characteristics. Thirty-one patients had severe GIB; 134 had major and43 had mild GIB, with no differences in severity, numberof PRBC, and length of hospital stay between the groups.Peptic disease was the most frequent etiology of GIB inpatients on VKA (20.2 % vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.20). Diverticularbleeding was the most frequent adverse event in patientson DOAC (14.3 % vs. 24.8 %, p = 0.056).Conclusions: severity and clinical outcomes of GIB aresimilar between patients on DOAC and patients on VKA,regardless of GIB etiology. (AU)

Effect of colonic distension on small bowel motility measured by jejunal high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal motility patterns in the jejunum can be detected in patients with prominent colonic content, and these abnormalities may be due to either a primary jejunal dysfunction or a reflex distortion. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of colonic distension on small bowel postprandial motility using high-resolution manometry. METHODS: Single center, controlled, parallel, randomized, single blind study in healthy subjects testing the effect of colonic filling vs sham infusion on the responses to a meal in 16 healthy subjects. Nutrients were continuously infused in the proximal jejunum (2 Kcal/min) during the 2-h study period to induce a steady-state postprandial motor pattern. Jejunal motility was measured by water-perfused, high-resolution manometry. After 1 h postprandial recording (basal period), gas was infused during 7.5 min via a rectal tube (720 mL or sham infusion), and jejunal motility was recorded for another hour. KEY RESULTS: Jejunal postprandial motility during the basal period was characterized by two overlapping components: a) continuous segmental activity (non-propagated or shortly propagated) and b) intercurrent propagated fronts (3.8 ± 1.1 fronts of 2-5 clustered contractions/h >10 cm propagation). As compared to sham infusion, colonic gas filling: a) inhibited continuous segmental contractile activity (by 17 ± 4%; p = 0.044 vs control group) and b) stimulated intermittent propagated fronts (up to 9.0 ± 2.2 fronts/h; p = 0.017 vs control group). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Long retrograde reflexes induced by colonic distension distort the balance between segmental and propagated activity, and may affect the normal response of the jejunum to food ingestion. Jejunal manometry in patients may be artifacted by colonic overload.

Síndrome de rumiación, revisión crítica / Rumination syndrome: Critical review

El síndrome de rumiación es un trastorno funcional caracterizado por la regurgitación involuntaria de los alimentos recientemente ingeridos desde el estómago hacia la boca, donde puede ser remasticados o expulsados. Desde el punto de vista clínico, se caracteriza por episodios repetidos de regurgitación de alimentos sin esfuerzo, con vómitos frecuentes como queja habitual. El mecanismo físico que genera los eventos de regurgitación depende de un proceso involuntario que altera las presiones abdominal y torácica, acompañado de una unión esofagogástrica permisiva. El diagnóstico del síndrome de rumiación es clínico: destaca la importancia de realizar una anamnesis exhaustiva sobre las características de los síntomas. Las pruebas complementarias se utilizan para corroborar el diagnóstico o descartar otra enfermedad orgánica. El tratamiento está enfocado a terapias conductuales como primera línea, reservando las terapias farmacológicas y quirúrgicas para casos refractarios.

Rumination syndrome is a functional disorder characterized by the involuntary regurgitation of recently swallowed food from the stomach into the mouth, from where it can be re-chewed or expelled. Clinically, it is characterized by repeated episodes of effortless food regurgitation. The most usual complaint is frequent vomiting. The physical mechanism that generates regurgitation events is dependent on an involuntary process that alters abdominal and thoracic pressures accompanied by a permissive oesophageal-gastric junction. The diagnosis of rumination syndrome is clinical, highlighting the importance of performing an exhaustive anamnesis on the characteristics of the symptoms. Complementary tests are used to corroborate the diagnosis or rule out organic pathology. Treatment is focused on behavioural therapies as the first line, reserving pharmacological and surgical therapies for refractory cases.

Severity of gastrointestinal bleeding is similar between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common adverse event related to anticoagulation therapy. However, evidence comparing the severity, etiology and outcome of GIB in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is scarce. AIMS: To evaluate the severity, etiology and outcomes of GIB in patients under DOACs compared to VKA. METHODS: Patients under oral anticoagulant therapy admitted to the emergency department with acute GIB were prospectively recruited from July 2016 to January 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Demographic and clinical outcome were obtained from medical records. Severity of the GIB event was classified as mild, major or severe according to clinical presentation and the type of support needed. Etiology and location of bleeding, number of packed red blood cells transfused (PRBC) and length of hospital stay were recorded until discharge or in-hospital death. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients with acute GIB under oral anticoagulant treatment were recruited: 119 patients were on VKA and 89 patients on DOAC with similar characteristics. Thirty-one patients had severe GIB; 134 major and 43 mild, with no differences in severity, number of PRBC and length of hospital stay between the groups. Peptic disease was the most frequent etiology of GIB in patients on VKA (20.2 % vs. 13.6%, p=0.20). Diverticular bleeding was the most frequent adverse event in patients on DOAC (14.3% vs. 24.8%, p= 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Severity and clinical outcomes of GIB are similar between patients on DOAC and patients on VKA, regardless of etiology of GIB.

Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunctio — Prevalence and manometric findings

Background: prescription opioid use is on the rise. There has been an increasing recognition that chronic opioid consumption can result in esophageal motility disorders, and this association has been named opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED).Aims: to analyze the prevalence of chronic opioid consumption in patients referred for esophageal motility testing in a European center; to describe the clinical characteristics and the association of opioid consumption with esophageal motility disorders.Methods: a retrospective, descriptive study in patients who had undergone an HRM in a single center. The clinical history in the electronic medical records was reviewed. Results: the prevalence of opioid prescription in patients referred to our institution was 10.1 %, and 4.8 % of themwere chronic active opioid users. There was a 32 % prevalence of OIED. Comparing chronic active opioid users(CAOU) with OIED and CAOU patients without OIED, there was a higher prevalence of males (43.8 % vs 8.8 %; p-value = 0.007). Converting the different opioid medications to morphine milligram equivalent daily dose (MMED), CAOU patients with OIED had a higher MMED than CAOU patients without OIED (125.2 ± 31.3 vs 33.4 ± 5.7 MME; p = 0.041). Dysphagia was the most common indication for performing an HRM in 60.0 % of CAOU patients. Furthermore, dysphagia was more frequent in CAOU patients with OIED (87.5 % vs 47.0 %; p = 0.019).Conclusions: chronic opioid users with OIED complained mostly of dysphagia. There was an association of male sex and a higher dose of opioids in CAOU patients with esophageal motility disorders. (AU)

Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction - Prevalence and manometric findings.

BACKGROUND: prescription opioid use is on the rise. There has been an increasing recognition that chronic opioid consumption can result in esophageal motility disorders, and this association has been named opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED). AIMS: to analyze the prevalence of chronic opioid consumption in patients referred for esophageal motility testing in a European center; to describe the clinical characteristics and the association of opioid consumption with esophageal motility disorders. METHODS: a retrospective, descriptive study in patients who had undergone an HRM in a single center. The clinical history in the electronic medical records was reviewed. RESULTS: the prevalence of opioid prescription in patients referred to our institution was 10.1 %, and 4.8 % of them were chronic active opioid users. There was a 32 % prevalence of OIED. Comparing chronic active opioid users (CAOU) with OIED and CAOU patients without OIED, there was a higher prevalence of males (43.8 % vs 8.8 %; p-value = 0.007). Converting the different opioid medications to morphine milligram equivalent daily dose (MMED), CAOU patients with OIED had a higher MMED than CAOU patients without OIED (125.2 ± 31.3 vs 33.4 ± 5.7 MME; p = 0.041). Dysphagia was the most common indication for performing an HRM in 60.0 % of CAOU patients. Furthermore, dysphagia was more frequent in CAOU patients with OIED (87.5 % vs 47.0 %; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: chronic opioid users with OIED complained mostly of dysphagia. There was an association of male sex and a higher dose of opioids in CAOU patients with esophageal motility disorders.

Rumination syndrome: Critical review. / Síndrome de rumiación, revisión crítica.

Rumination syndrome is a functional disorder characterized by the involuntary regurgitation of recently swallowed food from the stomach into the mouth, from where it can be re-chewed or expelled. Clinically, it is characterized by repeated episodes of effortless food regurgitation. The most usual complaint is frequent vomiting. The physical mechanism that generates regurgitation events is dependent on an involuntary process that alters abdominal and thoracic pressures accompanied by a permissive oesophageal-gastric junction. The diagnosis of rumination syndrome is clinical, highlighting the importance of performing an exhaustive anamnesis on the characteristics of the symptoms. Complementary tests are used to corroborate the diagnosis or rule out organic pathology. Treatment is focused on behavioural therapies as the first line, reserving pharmacological and surgical therapies for refractory cases.

Propagation patterns of jejunal motor activity measured by high-resolution water-perfused manometry.

BACKGROUND: The manometric diagnosis of severe intestinal dysmotility is performed at most institutions using catheters with 2-8 sensors 5-10 cm apart. The recent application of high-resolution manometry catheters with closely spaced sensors to other gut segments has been highly successful. The objective of the present study was to determine the feasibility of a jejunal high-resolution manometry method and to carry out a descriptive analysis of normal jejunal motor function. METHODS: A 36-channel high-resolution water-perfused manometry catheter (MMS-Laborie, Enschede, The Netherlands) was orally placed in the jejunum of 18 healthy subjects (10 men, eight women; 21-38 age range). Intestinal motility was recorded during 5 h, 3 during fasting, and 2 after a 450 kcal solid-liquid meal. Analysis of motility patterns was supported by computerized tools. KEY RESULTS: All healthy subjects except one showed at least one complete migrating motor complex during the 3 h fasting period. Phase III activity lasted 5 ± 1 min and migrated aborally at a velocity of 7 ± 3 cm/min. High-resolution spatial analysis showed that during phase III each individual contraction propagated rapidly (75 ± 37 cm/min) over a 32 ± 10 cm segment of the jejunum. During phase II, most contractile activity corresponded to propagated contractile events which increased in frequency from early to late phase II (0.5 ± 0.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.3 events/10 min, respectively; p < 0.001). After meal ingestion, non-propagated activity increased, whereas propagated events were less frequent than during late phase II. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Jejunal motility analysis with high-resolution manometry identifies propagated contractile patterns which are not apparent with conventional manometric catheters.

Normative reference values for esophageal high-resolution manometry in healthy adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Establishing normative values of high-resolution esophageal manometry is necessary for accurate interpretation and comparison of measurements. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize normal values for different esophageal high-resolution manometry systems. Moreover, we assessed the effect of body position, bolus consistency, and provocative maneuvers on these normative thresholds. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 1st, 2006, to January 20th, 2020, for studies that reported normative data of high-resolution manometry in healthy volunteers. We assessed methodological quality of the included studies and planned a descriptive analysis. We analyzed data from 54 articles describing normative thresholds in high-resolution manometry using solid-state or water-perfused systems. Forty-six studies performed the manometry study in the supine position with liquid swallows, whereas sixteen studies described normative values in the upright position. Twelve studies assessed normative values for different bolus consistencies, and nine studies evaluated different provocative maneuvers. There is a considerable variety of normative values for esophageal high-resolution manometry depending on the equipment used and the protocols performed to obtain measurements. This should be taken into account when evaluating measurements in clinical practice and when comparing results of published research studies.