Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 134
Filtrar
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 135(4): 293-296, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 'second victim phenomenon' is a term attributed to the traumatic effect a medical error can have on healthcare professionals. Patient safety incidents have been shown to occur in as many as one in seven patients in hospital. These incidents cause significant, potentially devastating, trauma to patients and their relatives, and can have deep and long-lasting effects on the health professionals involved. These incidents can have a negative impact on doctors' emotional wellbeing; their professional practice in relation to this impact has not been extensively investigated in surgical trainees. METHOD: A survey of UK otolaryngology trainees was conducted to investigate the effects of complications and medical errors on trainees, and examine how these are discussed within departments. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that further training is required and would be warmly received by otolaryngology trainees as part of higher surgical training.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos/psicologia , Otolaringologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/educação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(1)2020 Jan 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30888419

RESUMO

Esophagectomy is a mainstay in curative treatment for esophageal cancer; however, the reported techniques and outcomes can vary greatly. Thirty-day mortality of patients with an intact anastomosis is 2-3% as compared to 17-35% in patients who have an anastomotic leak. The subsequent management of leaks postesophagectomy has great global variability with little consensus on a gold standard of practice. The aim of this multicentre prospective audit is to analyze current techniques of esophagogastric anastomosis to determine the effect on the anastomotic leak rate. Leak rates and leak management will be assessed to determine their impact on patient outcomes. A 12-month international multicentre prospective audit started in April 2018 and is coordinated by a team from the West Midlands Research Collaborative. This will include patients undergoing esophagectomy over 9 months and encompassing a 90-day follow-up period. A pilot data collection period occurred at four UK centers in 2017 to trial the data collection form. The audit standards will include anastomotic leak and the conduit necrosis rate should be less than 13% and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more) should be less than 35%. The 30-day mortality rate should be less than 5% and the 90-day mortality rate should be less than 8%. This will be a trainee-led international audit of esophagectomy practice. Key support will be given by consultant colleagues and anesthetists. Individualized unit data will be distributed to the respective contributing sites. An overall anonymized report will be made available to contributing units. Results of the audit will be published in peer-reviewed journals with all collaborators fully acknowledged. The key information and results from the audit will be disseminated at relevant scientific meetings.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Esôfago/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
3.
4.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(5): 1-10, 2017 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28375436

RESUMO

Esophageal replacement by colonic interposition is an uncommon procedure. This study sought to identify the frequency of this operation in England, identify techniques and associated problems, and also assess health-related quality of life (HR QOL) from the two largest centers performing this procedure. Hospital Episode Statistics were used to identify patients and centers undertaking colon interposition between March 2001 and March 2015. An online survey of UK consultants discussed methods and experience. HR QOL was assessed using the Short Form 36(SF-36v2) with additional gastrointestinal questions. Hospital Episode Statistics identified 328 interpositions (22 in pediatric hospitals). The two highest volume units did 42 and 45 operations, respectively. Thirty-four surgeons (79% response rate) replied to the survey. Fifty-two percent preferred to use the left colon with 81% preferring a substernal placement. The HR QOL survey was performed on 24 patients with a median of 3 years after surgery (ranging from 9 months to 10 years) from the two largest centers and a 56% response rate. Five patients had physical QOL scores above population average and 10 had mental scores above population average. All patients had early satiety, 20 described dysphagia, and 18 regularly took antireflux medication. There was an estimated mean loss of 13.1% body weight (10.6 kg) postoperatively and three patients still relied on a feeding tube for nutrition after an average of 3 years. Colon interposition results in an acceptable long-term QOL. Few centers regularly perform this operation, and centralizing to high-volume centers may lead to better outcomes.


Assuntos
Colo/cirurgia , Colo/transplante , Doenças do Esôfago/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Br J Surg ; 104(1): 98-107, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27762448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients admitted with acute gallbladder pathology is unclear. Some studies have shown that emergency cholecystectomy during the index admission can reduce length of hospital stay with similar rates of conversion to open surgery, complications and mortality compared with a 'delayed' operation following discharge. Others have reported that cholecystectomy during the index acute admission results in higher morbidity, extended length of stay and increased costs. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of emergency versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute benign gallbladder disease. METHODS: Using data from a prospective population-based cohort study examining the outcomes of cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland, a model-based cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service, with a 1-year time horizon for costs and outcomes. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the impact of parameter uncertainty on the results obtained from the model. RESULTS: Emergency cholecystectomy was found to be less costly (£4570 versus £4720; €5484 versus €5664) and more effective (0·8868 versus 0·8662 QALYs) than delayed cholecystectomy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the emergency strategy is more than 60 per cent likely to be cost-effective across willingness-to-pay values for the QALY from £0 to £100 000 (€0-120 000). CONCLUSION: Emergency cholecystectomy is less costly and more effective than delayed cholecystectomy. This approach is likely to be beneficial to patients in terms of improved health outcomes and to the healthcare provider owing to the reduced costs.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/economia , Colecistite Aguda/economia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Emergências , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medicina Estatal/economia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Reino Unido
6.
BJS Open ; 1(1): 1, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29951598
7.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 98(6): 431-5, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27138854

RESUMO

Introduction The research fellowship scheme for surgeons in training run by The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) had its 20th anniversary in 2013. A survey was undertaken to assess outcomes of the scheme during those 20 years. Methods Fellowship recipients were invited to complete an online 20-item questionnaire about their fellowship research and research activities since its completion. The questionnaire covered type of research undertaken, higher research degree enrolment, publications resulting from the fellowship research and subsequent research career. Results Of the 502 RCS fellowship recipients, 361 responded (72%). Their research covered a broad array of topics, Almost two-thirds (62%) undertook laboratory-based research and most of the remainder conducted patient-based clinical research. The vast majority (96%) of respondents had enrolled for a higher degree, with a high completion rate: 91% of fellowship recipients in the first 15 years of the scheme obtained their degree. Of the fellowships from the first 15 years of the scheme, between a fifth and a third of recipients subsequently held an academic position. The median number of peer reviewed articles and presentations per recipient was 3 and 6 respectively. Almost two-thirds (60%) of respondents had obtained funding for further research, with over half of these receiving grants from national research funding bodies. Conclusions The RCS research fellowship scheme has helped trainee surgeons to undertake research towards the start of their career. Most trainees used RCS fellowships as part of their funding towards a higher degree and this was regularly achieved, along with a number of peer reviewed publications. A significant proportion of fellowship recipients progressed into academic positions in surgery.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Bolsas de Estudo , Mobilidade Ocupacional , Inglaterra , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Conserv Biol ; 30(5): 1122-7, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26931376

RESUMO

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac is highly toxic to Gyps vultures, and its recent widespread use in South Asia caused catastrophic declines in at least 3 scavenging raptors. The manufacture of veterinary formulations of diclofenac has since been banned across the region with mixed success. However, at least 12 other NSAIDs are available for veterinary use in South Asia. Aceclofenac is one of these compounds, and it is known to metabolize into diclofenac in some mammal species. The metabolic pathway of aceclofenac in cattle, the primary food of vultures in South Asia, is unknown. We gave 6 cattle the recommended dose of aceclofenac (2 mg/kg), collected blood thereafter at intervals for up to 12 h, and used liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry in a pharmacokinetic analysis of aceclofenac and diclofenac in the plasma. Nearly all the aceclofenac administered to the cattle was very rapidly metabolized into diclofenac. At 2 h, half the aceclofenac had been converted into diclofenac, and at 12 h four-fifths of the aceclofenac had been converted into diclofenac. Therefore, administering aceclofenac to livestock poses the same risk to vultures as administering diclofenac to livestock. This, coupled with the risk that aceclofenac may replace diclofenac in the veterinary market, points to the need for an immediate ban on all aceclofenac formulations that can be used to treat livestock. Without such a ban, the recovery of vultures across South Asia will not be successful.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/toxicidade , Diclofenaco/análogos & derivados , Diclofenaco/toxicidade , Falconiformes , Animais , Ásia , Bovinos , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Diclofenaco/metabolismo , Diclofenaco/farmacocinética , Espécies em Perigo de Extinção
11.
Br J Surg ; 103(1): 27-34; discussion 34, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26331356

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of perioperative antibiotics in reducing surgical-site infection (SSI) and overall nosocomial infections in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic and low- and moderate-risk cholecystitis (Tokyo classification) is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess this. METHODS: Searches were conducted of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The analysis was performed using the random-effects method, and the risk ratio (RR) with 95 per cent c.i. was employed. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs, published between 1997 and 2015, with a total of 5259 participants, of whom 2709 (51·5 per cent) were treated with antibiotics, were included. SSI and overall nosocomial infections were detected in 2·4 and 4·2 per cent respectively of patients given perioperative antibiotics, and in 3·2 and 7·2 per cent of those who received no antibiotics. Antibiotics did not significantly reduce the risk of SSI (RR 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·58 to 1·13; P = 0·21) or overall nosocomial infections (RR 0·64, 0·36 to 1·14; P = 0·13). There was no significant between-study heterogeneity for SSI, but significant between-study heterogeneity in the eight studies that reported nosocomial infections. Analysis of studies considered to be high quality, grouped according to the timing of antibiotics (preoperative only or perioperative) and reporting intention-to-treat analyses, again failed to show a significant reduction in SSI. CONCLUSION: Antibiotics should not be administered before laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with biliary colic and/or low- and moderate-risk cholecystitis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite/cirurgia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos
13.
Br J Surg ; 102(10): 1272-7, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26104685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the increased mortality previously identified for surgery performed on Fridays was apparent following major elective colorectal resections and how this might be affected by case mix. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resections in England from 2001 to 2011 were identified using Hospital Episode Statistics. Propensity scores were used to match patients having operations on a Friday in a 1 : 1 ratio with those undergoing surgery on other weekdays. Multivariable analyses were used to investigate overall deaths within 1 year of operation. RESULTS: A total of 204,669 records were extracted for patients undergoing major elective colorectal resections. Patients who had surgery on Fridays were more deprived (4780 (17.1 per cent) of 27,920 versus 28,317 (16.0 per cent) of 176,749; P < 0.001), a greater proportion had had an emergency admission in the 3 previous months (7870 (28.2 per cent) of 27,920 versus 48,623 (27.5 per cent) of 176,749; P = 0.019), underwent minimal access surgery (4565 (16.4 per cent) of 27,920 versus 23,783 (13.5 per cent) of 176,749; P < 0.001) and had surgery for benign diagnoses (6502 (23.3 per cent) of 27,920 versus 38,725 (21.9 per cent) of 176,749; P < 0.001) than those who had surgery on Mondays to Thursdays. In a matched analysis the odds ratio for 30-day mortality after colorectal resections performed on Fridays compared with other weekdays was 1.25 (95 per cent c.i. 1.13 to 1.37); odds ratios for 90-day and 1-year mortality were 1.16 (1.07 to 1.25) and 1.10 (1.04 to 1.16) respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients selected for colorectal resections on Fridays had a higher mortality rate than patients operated on from Monday to Thursday and had different characteristics, suggesting that increased mortality may reflect patient factors rather than hospital variables alone.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Hepatectomia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
16.
World J Surg ; 37(10): 2443-53, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23716026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to describe the impact of treatment of pancreatic and peri-ampullary malignancy on patient reported outcomes (PRO). However, limited data are available describing the impact of curative or palliative therapy on pancreatic/peri-ampullary malignancy and quality of life. METHODS: Patients selected for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire pre-surgery and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients selected for palliative treatments completed the same questionnaire before treatment and monthly thereafter. Mean scores and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for functional scales. Symptom scales and single items were categorized as either minimal or severe, and they were reported as proportions of patients experiencing severe symptoms with 95 % CI. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (53 planned PD, 47 palliative) were enrolled. Of the 53 patients planned for surgery, 12 had tumors that were unresectable and 41 underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Seven patients were excluded because of benign histology or concurrent malignancy. Baseline questionnaire compliance was 70 %. For those undergoing PD, there were 53 complications, 7 deaths at 1 year, and 14 deaths at 2 years. Post-surgery most functions and symptoms deteriorated. Recovery in global health and most symptoms occurred by 3 months, and functional scales recovered by 6 months. Recovery of PRO was maintained in the survivors at 2 years. Palliative patients had poorer function and more symptoms at baseline; however, poor follow-up questionnaire compliance prevented further analysis of this group. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy has a short-term negative impact on PRO that recovers within 6 months and is maintained at 2 years in survivors. Further work evaluating palliative and curative treatment in larger patient groups with disease-specific questionnaires is necessary.


Assuntos
Ampola Hepatopancreática , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Br J Pharmacol ; 168(6): 1316-28, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23126308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Growing evidence implicates iron in the aetiology of gastrointestinal cancer. Furthermore, studies demonstrate that iron chelators possess potent anti-tumour activity, although whether iron chelators show activity against oesophageal cancer is not known. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effect of the iron chelators, deferoxamine (DFO) and deferasirox, on cellular iron metabolism, viability and proliferation was assessed in two oesophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines, OE33 and OE19, and the squamous oesophageal cell line, OE21. A murine xenograft model was employed to assess the effect of deferasirox on oesophageal tumour burden. The ability of chelators to overcome chemoresistance and to enhance the efficacy of standard chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin, fluorouracil and epirubicin) was also assessed. KEY RESULTS: Deferasirox and DFO effectively inhibited cellular iron acquisition and promoted intracellular iron mobilization. The resulting reduction in cellular iron levels was reflected by increased transferrin receptor 1 expression and reduced cellular viability and proliferation. Treating oesophageal tumour cell lines with an iron chelator in addition to a standard chemotherapeutic agent resulted in a reduction in cellular viability and proliferation compared with the chemotherapeutic agent alone. Both DFO and deferasirox were able to overcome cisplatin resistance. Furthermore, in human xenograft models, deferasirox was able to significantly suppress tumour growth, which was associated with decreased tumour iron levels. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The clinically established iron chelators, DFO and deferasirox, effectively deplete iron from oesophageal tumour cells, resulting in growth suppression. These data provide a platform for assessing the utility of these chelators in the treatment of oesophageal cancer patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Esôfago/efeitos dos fármacos , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Benzoatos/administração & dosagem , Benzoatos/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Deferasirox , Desferroxamina/administração & dosagem , Desferroxamina/farmacologia , Desferroxamina/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esôfago/metabolismo , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro/sangue , Ferro/metabolismo , Quelantes de Ferro/administração & dosagem , Quelantes de Ferro/farmacologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Camundongos Nus , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/farmacologia , Carga Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Antitumorais Modelo de Xenoenxerto
20.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2012(6): 14, 2012 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960683

RESUMO

The vast majority of gastric cancers are sporadic. However, 1-3% arise as a result of inherited gastric cancer predisposition syndromes, generally referred to as hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Of those families that fulfill the clinical criteria for HGDC only 25% have a CDH1 germline mutation. No reliable surveillance technique exists for individuals with HDGC. Difficult decisions have therefore to be made by mutation carriers to proceed with prophylactic total gastrectomy, or undergo lifelong annual surveillance. We present a case of the management of a patient with a documented CDH1 mutation and briefly review the available literature.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...