[Role of endovascular therapy for redo surgery in patients after aortoiliac aneurysm exclusion]. / Stellenwert der endovaskulären Therapie bei Reeingriffen nach Ausschaltung aortoiliakaler Aneurysmata.

INTRODUCTION: Redo surgery or reintervention following conventional or endovascular aortoiliac reconstruction often requires exclusion of new aneurysms. In the present study the potentials of endovascular management of such lesions are investigated. METHODS: All patients with endovascular reoperation for of newly developed aortoiliac aneurysms were identified from a prospectively run data-base. The indications and results of endovascular therapy were analysed retrospectively. In detail, data were analysed for the type of original operation, interval until and kind of reoperation, and results concerning survival, technical success and complications. RESULTS: From 12 / 2003 through 3 / 2007 195 patients with aortoiliac aneurysms were operated. Endovascular repair was performed in 15 cases of previously excluded aneurysms. Mean age of these 15 patients (12 men) was 73 (64-85) years. Ten patients had a primary conventional (group A) and 5 patients had a primary endovascular (group B) aneurysm repair. The mean time interval between the first and second operation was 8.9 (1-26) years. The secondary endovascular therapy in group A was successful in all cases. In group B endoleaks type I a (n = 1), I a / b (n = 1), II (n = 2) and III (n = 1) were treated. One type II endoleak could only be treated successfully by conversion to open repair, the other one was successfully treated by reintervention. All but one patient are alive and -remained free of pathological findings during a median follow-up of 13 (2-39) months. DISCUSSION: Because of the clearly elevated operation risk of redo surgery after conventional or endovascular aneurysm repair, endovascular aneurysm exclusion represents the method of first choice. The reasonable selection and combination of procedures allows for an optimal adaptation of therapy to the individual case.

[Endovascular therapy of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in a renal transplant recipient]. / Endovaskuläre Therapie eines infrarenalen Aortenaneurysmas bei heterotopem Nierentransplantat.

INTRODUCTION: The indications for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) are mainly established in hostile abdomen, in patients with significant comorbidities which affect the general operability of the patient and, given the necessary infrastructure, also in ruptured aneurysm. Along to those, we present another possible indication in the presence of a kidney allograft in patients with aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Based on a case report of aorto-biiliac stent-graft repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm in a patient with renal allograft, a systematic review of the literature was performed of all similar cases concerning surgical therapy in this constellation. RESULTS: EVAR was performed using an aorto-biiliac system (Zenith) Trifab, COOK) in a 61-year-old male patient 11 years after heterotopic renal allotransplantation in the right iliac fossa. Preoperative renal function was normal. Because the donor renal artery was anastomosed to the recipient's external iliac artery the stent-graft was implanted from the left common femoral artery to minimize temporary allograft ischemia. The intra- and postoperative course was uneventful with a follow-up of presently 12 months. A primary type-II endoleak (retroleak from a lumbar artery) is being treated conservatively so far with embolization being a future option. At present there are 15 cases of EVAR in renal allograft patients that have been reported, all of them being successful. DISCUSSION: All data existing in the literature reported to date as well as our own experience justify the first choice of EVAR in morphologically suitable cases. One major advantage of EVAR in this constellation is the avoidance of aortic cross clamping which poses the graft at risk of ischemia. Long-term results will be most important for definite assessment of EVAR. However, contrast media application during the operation and for CT surveillance should be considered as a major disadvantage.