[Renal cell carcinoma molecular biology. Prognostic and therapeutic usefulness]. / Biología molecular en adenocarcinoma renal (RCC). Su utilidad pronóstica y terapéutica.

Renal cell adenocarcinoma requires different therapeutic pathways because it is one of the most therapy-resistant tumors, on the other hand it is biologically one of the most attractive tumors. Its pathological classification has a genetic base. There is an anomaly of the Von Hippel Lindau gene in 80% of adenocarcinomas, being this fact determinant to know the biological characteristics of tumor initiation and development, as well as the identification of factors susceptible to be used as therapeutic targets. Since 2005 a group of molecules have been used in the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas and, even though therapeutic results are significant but not clinically relevant yet, we are sure they are a key way for more efficient future developments. The present study tries to make a tour on the research of the biological anomalies in renal adenocarcinoma with special emphasis in the Von HippelLindau gene.

Biologia molecular en adenocarcinoma renal (RCC). Su utilidad pronóstica y terapéutica / Renal cell carcinoma molecular biology. Prognostic and therapeutic usefulness

El adenocarcinoma renal requiere caminos terapéuticos diferentes porque es uno de los tumores más resistentes a tratamiento, por contra es uno de los tumores biológicamente más atractivos. Su clasificación anatomopatológica tiene un fundamento genético. En el 80% de los adenocarcinomas existe una alteración del gen Von Hippel Lindau y este hecho ha sido determinante para conocer las características biológicas de la aparición y desarrollo tumoral así como la identificación de factores que pueden ser susceptibles de ser utilizados como dianas terapéuticas. Desde 2005 un grupo de moléculas se ha utilizado en el tratamiento de los adenocarcinomas metastásicos y aunque los resultados terapéuticos son significativos pero no todavía clínicamente relevantes, estamos seguros que son un camino clave para desarrollos posteriores más eficientes. El presente estudio pretende hacer un recorrido por la investigación de las alteraciones biológicas en adenocarcinoma renal haciendo especial énfasis en las alteraciones del gen Von Hippel Lindau(AU)

Renal cell adenocarcinoma requires different therapeutic pathways because it is one of the most therapy-resistant tumors, on the other hand it is biologically one of the most attractive tumors. Its pathological classification has a genetic base. There is an anomaly of the Von Hippel Lindau gene in 80% of adenocarcinomas, being this fact determinant to know the biological characteristics of tumor initiation and development, as well as the identification of factors susceptible to be used as therapeutic targets. Since 2005 a group of molecules have been used in the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas and, even though therapeutic results are significant but not clinically relevant yet, we are sure they are a key way for more efficient future developments. The present study tries to make a tour on the research of the biological anomaliesin renal adenocarcinoma with special emphasis in the Von HippelLindau gene(AU)

Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival. A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests. RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45 (10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (±54.1 SD). There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months ±54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months ±51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84%(95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI:i; 80-90%) respectively]. After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival. The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs.97%]. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one.

Impacto del retrasplante renal en la supervivencia del injerto y receptor / Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival

OBJETIVO: Nuestro objetivo es valorar si un segundo o tercer trasplante tienen influencia en la supervivencia del injerto renal y en la del receptor.MÉTODOS: Analizamos retrospectivamente 419 trasplantes renales consecutivos realizados entre 1994 y 2010, analizando la influencia del retrasplante en la supervivencia del injerto renal. Se ha realizado un estudio de homogeneidad de los dos grupos mediante Tablas de contingencia para las variables cualitativas y t de student para las cuantitativas. La supervivencia y comparación de supervivencia con Kaplan-Meyer y log-rank..RESULTADOS: De los 419 trasplantes, 370 (88,3%) fueron primeros trasplantes 45(10,7%) segundos trasplantes y 4(1%) terceros. Media de seguimiento de todo el grupo de 72,5 meses (+/- 54,1 DE) y mediana de 68,8 meses( Rango de 0 a 188 meses ).No existen diferencias en el tiempo de seguimiento (Media del grupo de pacientes con un solo trasplante de 73,1 meses +/-54,4DE Vs. 61,6 meses +/-51,2DE del grupo de pacientes retrasplantados. p >0,05).El análisis de la supervivencia actuarial del injerto revela que no existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes con un primer trasplante y los retrasplantados [SPV 89% (95% IC; 87- 91%) y 84% (95% IC; 82-86%) a los 3 y 5 años frente a 88% (95% IC; 83-93%) a los 3 años y 85% (95% IC; 80-90%) a los 5 años]. Al ajustar por las variables para las que los grupos no fueron homogeneos las diferencias se siguen manteniendo.El análisis de supervivencia de los receptores revela que tampoco existen diferencias entre los dos grupos [SPV del 98% y 96% a los 3 y 5 años en los primeros trasplantes frente a 97% a los 3 años y 5 años en los retrasplantados].CONCLUSIONES: No existen diferencias en la supervivencia del injerto ni en la de los receptores entre pacientes trasplantados por primera vez y aquellos que reciben un retrasplante(AU)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival.METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival.A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests.RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45(10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (+/-54.1 SD).There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months +/-54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months +/-51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5-year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84% (95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI; 80-90%) respectively].After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival.The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs. 97%].CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one(AU)