Doxycycline's Potential Role in Reducing Thrombosis and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Doxycycline has revealed potential effects in animal studies to prevent thrombosis and reduce mortality. However, less is known about its antithrombotic role in patients with COVID-19. Our study aimed to evaluate doxycycline's impact on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Patients who received doxycycline in intensive care units (ICUs) were compared to patients who did not (control). The primary outcome was the composite thrombotic events. The secondary outcomes were 30-day and in-hospital mortality, length of stay, ventilator-free days, and complications during ICU stay. Propensity score (PS) matching was used based on the selected criteria. Logistic, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used as appropriate. After PS (1:3) matching, 664 patients (doxycycline n = 166, control n = 498) were included. The number of thromboembolic events was lower in the doxycycline group (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.26-1.08; P = .08); however, it failed to reach to a statistical significance. Moreover, D-dimer levels and 30-day mortality were lower in the doxycycline group (beta coefficient [95% CI]: -0.22 [-0.46, 0.03; P = .08]; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.52-1.00; P = .05, respectively). In addition, patients who received doxycycline had significantly lower odds of bacterial/fungal pneumonia (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.94; P = .02). The use of doxycycline as adjunctive therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19 might may be a desirable therapeutic option for thrombosis reduction and survival benefits.

Patient Beliefs on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Saudi Arabia.

Background Antibiotic overuse is a critical global health issue, and patient attitudes and expectations play a significant role in the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Limited research has been conducted on patient knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of antibiotic use in Saudi Arabia. This survey aimed to assess patients' knowledge and attitudes related to antibiotic use in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional survey using a convenience sampling method was conducted in Saudi Arabia. An online self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic data, antibiotic knowledge, and attitudes. Results The study included 400 patients, with a mean age of 39 years and an equal gender distribution (54% female). Most participants (75%) had not used antibiotics in the past year. Patients demonstrated moderate knowledge about antibiotics, with 81% recognizing that antibiotics can cause side effects and 69% knowing that overuse can lead to resistance. However, only 44% knew that antibiotics are not effective for all infections, and only half (50%) knew that antibiotics work against bacteria, not viruses. Patients held mixed attitudes toward antibiotic prescribing, with 25% believing it was essential to take antibiotics for every infection and 44% believing healthcare providers should prescribe antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. Logistic regression analyses showed that patient expectations for antibiotic prescribing were strongly associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. In contrast, patient satisfaction with antibiotic prescribing was negatively associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. Lower health literacy levels were also associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. Conclusion The study underscores the need for interventions that promote patient education and communication to ensure appropriate antibiotic use in primary care. Patient attitudes and beliefs, such as their expectations for antibiotic prescribing and health literacy levels, were identified as significant predictors of inappropriate antibiotic use.

Insights Into Medication Adherence Among Patients With Chronic Diseases in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background Non-adherence to medication is a common problem in managing chronic diseases, which are a significant public health concern globally. This study aimed to identify factors related to medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases in Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data through an online survey administered to 400 patients with chronic diseases residing in Jeddah between January and March 2023. The survey included questions about socio-demographic characteristics, chronic disease diagnosis, medication adherence, and factors that may influence medication adherence. Results This study recruited 400 participants and found that the majority were female, with a mean age of 46.2 years, and most had at least one chronic disease, with hypertension and diabetes being the most common. The medication adherence score for the entire sample was 5.4, indicating moderate adherence. Overall, 22.9% of study participants had poor adherence to medications. Factors associated with medication adherence included age, gender, and education level, with older age, female gender, and higher education being positively associated with adherence. Medication-related factors such as the number of medications prescribed, medication complexity, and medication cost were also found to be significantly associated with medication adherence. Conclusion Our study of medication adherence among chronic disease patients in Saudi Arabia found that adherence rates were moderate, with several factors significantly associated with better adherence. Specifically, older age, female gender, and higher education level were positively associated with better adherence, while a higher number of prescribed medications, more complex medication regimens, and higher medication costs were all significant predictors of poorer adherence.

Colistin Loading Dose in Septic Patients with Gram Negative Infections.

Purpose: Intravenous (IV) colistin is commonly used to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. It is primarily eliminated renally and may induce acute kidney injury (AKI) at a rate of up to 53%. Consequently, septic patients who require colistin administration have an additional risk of developing AKI. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical failure and AKI predictors for septic patients treated with IV colistin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. Adult septic patients with suspected or confirmed gram-negative infections who received colistin admitted to the hospital between May 2016 and December 2020 were screened after obtaining IRB approval. AKI was defined based on the AKI Network criteria. We investigated the incidence of clinical failure based on colistin dosing and AKI risk factors, such as the development of septic shock, severity of illness, and medication co-administration using a multiple logistic regression model. Results: After screening 163 patients, 103 patients were included in the analysis. No difference was observed between the colistin dosing strategies for clinical failure. Of the included predictors, development of septic shock (OR: 3.75; 95% CI 1.18-13.15), carbapenem co-administration (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.134-15.57) were associated with an increased risk of AKI. The other factors were not significant predictors. Conclusion: Clinical failure was not affected by colistin dosing strategies in our cohort of patients with sepsis. Moreover, the co-administration of carbapenems and the development of septic shock may increase the risk of inducing AKI in adult septic patients treated with IV colistin. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

The Saudi Critical Care Society practice guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in the ICU: Therapy section.

BACKGROUND: The rapid increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases during the subsequent waves in Saudi Arabia and other countries prompted the Saudi Critical Care Society (SCCS) to put together a panel of experts to issue evidence-based recommendations for the management of COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The SCCS COVID-19 panel included 51 experts with expertise in critical care, respirology, infectious disease, epidemiology, emergency medicine, clinical pharmacy, nursing, respiratory therapy, methodology, and health policy. All members completed an electronic conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel addressed 9 questions that are related to the therapy of COVID-19 in the ICU. We identified relevant systematic reviews and clinical trials, then used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach as well as the evidence-to-decision framework (EtD) to assess the quality of evidence and generate recommendations. RESULTS: The SCCS COVID-19 panel issued 12 recommendations on pharmacotherapeutic interventions (immunomodulators, antiviral agents, and anticoagulants) for severe and critical COVID-19, of which 3 were strong recommendations and 9 were weak recommendations. CONCLUSION: The SCCS COVID-19 panel used the GRADE approach to formulate recommendations on therapy for COVID-19 in the ICU. The EtD framework allows adaptation of these recommendations in different contexts. The SCCS guideline committee will update recommendations as new evidence becomes available.

Correlation Between Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Permanent Histopathology Results in Salivary Gland Masses.

Objective Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been widely accepted as a diagnostic safe method for preoperative assessment of salivary gland lesions. This diagnostic tool is inexpensive, easy to perform, relatively painless and it provides useful information to differentiate between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors that helps in the management and surgical planning. This study was undertaken to compare FNAC results with permanent histopathological findings of salivary gland tumors in order to assess its diagnostic accuracy. Materials and methods A total of 37 archived salivary gland FNAC specimens collected between January 2001 and January 2018 were correlated with proven histopathology findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. False negative and false positive cases were determined. Results There were 20 female and 17 male patients. Parotid tumors count for 62.2% and submandibular tumors 37.8%. All cases of malignancy on FNAC were proven to be malignant on the final pathology findings. All cases that were suspicious for malignancy on FNAC were proven to be malignant as well. In addition, three false negative cases were seen and no false positive cases among all FNAC cases. In our series, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 57.1%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 91.4%. Conclusion This study demonstrated that FNA cytology of the salivary gland is a useful technique for diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Insufficient cellularity was the most important factor that resulted in incorrect cytological interpretation.

Recurrence Rate in a Patient Treated with Colon Resection Followed by Chemotherapy in Comparison to a Patient Treated with Colon Resection without Chemotherapy.

Given that colon cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, it is essential to employ strategies to try to reduce its incidence and recurrence rate. Though colon cancer is a sporadic disease in the vast majority of cases, multiple risk factors are linked to this disease, namely, obesity and cigarette smoking. Additionally, not many studies have been done in Saudi Arabia studying the recurrence rate of colon cancer. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at King Khalid Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia to investigate the recurrence rate of colon cancer in patients treated with complete colon resection followed by chemotherapy versus patients treated with colon resection alone via electronic and paper medical records. A total of 120 patients were included in this study; 61 were males (50.8%) and 59 were females (49.2%). According to our findings, the recurrence rate in patients who underwent surgical resection with adjuvant chemotherapy was 15.6% (n = 10), while the recurrence rate in patients with surgery alone was 21.4% (n = 12). Cancer recurrence is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, further studies should be done to investigate the recurrence rate in patients with risk factors to identify and deal with the causes of recurrence.

Peripheral Neuropathy as a Risk Factor for Developing Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetic Patients.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is prevalent in developing countries and is associated with many comorbidities, including diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we assessed and evaluated the association between DPN and CVD. Methods The study is a cross-sectional study that included DM patients who are attending DM primary care clinics. We evaluated each patient and collected epidemiological data, the physical examination findings, including cardiovascular status, and the presence of DPN. DPN was assessed with the neuropathic disability score (NDS), and it was considered present if the score was 5 or higher. The age and the levels of blood glucose, HbA1C, and plasma total cholesterol were recorded. Results The study included 116 DM, the mean age was 64.5±15 years (19 to 84 years) and the majority (61.2%) of the sample were male. The sample was divided into two groups: patients with DM only and patients with DM and CVD. The CVD group had a higher NDS score compared to the non-CVD group (P=0.006). The result indicated that for the CVD group, the prevalence of DPN was higher (50.8%) as compared to the non-CVD group (30.2%) (P=0.041). DPN was also associated with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (P = 0.013) but not heart failure (HF) (P=0.427). In addition, the HbA1C was significantly higher in patients with DPN (P=0.0345). Conclusion Our findings indicate that DPN was more prevalent in the CVD group and, in particular, in the group with ACS. The evidence provides support for the association between DPN and CVD.