RESUMO
We begin the review by pointing to the common stigma associated with mental health issues, which often derives from a lack of understanding or incomplete knowledge. Neurobiological research provides us with a new lens to help challenge and dispel common assumptions and misunderstandings and gives an understanding of sexual behaviours that influence society. As such, it generates substantial evidence for the structural and functional asymmetry of the brains of individuals with mental disorders. However, this type of representation poses many challenges to traditional thinking and constantly provokes change in perspective and empathy towards those individuals. In the review, we go deeper into the effects of neurobiological findings on understanding criminal behaviours and personality disorders, looking further beyond behavioural health. These problems, which were once mainly discussed as moral ones or viewed from the perspective of character flaws, are analysed today through neurological considerations pointing to their complexity. When the root of bipolar disorder is revealed to be neurological, society will react with more information and understanding, hence reducing the stigmatisation and discrimination meted out to people with these problems. At a macro level, findings from neurobiology affect society in ways that go beyond individuals; social attitudes, laws, and policies about the services rendered are influenced. Operating as a catalyst within the community, neurobiological research helps to initiate social change through the creation of an informed, understanding public forum. Thus, it creates broader value for those dealing with behavioural and mental health challenges. The first and most important question of this narrative review is focused on identifying identifiable neurobiological markers that are closely related to criminal conduct, personality disorders, and mental health disorders. Through this review, we aim to present detailed insights into the neurological foundations that anchor these phenomena via a narrative analysis of contemporary literature. The potential implications are finding problems early to apply specific treatment and learning an advanced strategy for social attitudes. This will promote a more humanistic approach based on adequate information on the behavioural and mental health issues involved.
RESUMO
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an essential procoagulant drug used in various intra- and postoperative situations. Its efficacy and safety profile in obese cases undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is still unresolved. Therefore, this meta-analysis evaluated and investigated the current intra- and postoperative effects and hazards of TXA on patients undergoing LSG. As for methodology, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed were thoroughly searched for relevant studies. Retrieved results were prepared for screening through Endnote, helping to identify eligible studies. Relevant patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality of the relevant studies was appraised using the respected appraisal tool. Six studies of different designs were enrolled, comprising 753 cases that underwent LSG and administered TXA. Their mean BMI and age went from 37.3 to 56.25 kg/m2 and 33.5 to 43.25 years, respectively. Tranexamic acid significantly linked to reduction in intraoperative bleeding instances, operative blood loss, and operative duration, compared to placebo ((RR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.44, 0.98], P=0.04, I2 = 81%); (MD = -39.64, 95%CI [-75.49, -3.78], P=0.03, I2=94%); (MD=-5.84, 95%CI [-9.62, -2.05], P=0.003, I2=73%)). Tranexamic acid also significantly showed superiority regarding postoperative bleeding events and duration of hospitalization compared to the control group ((RR= 0.45, 95%CI [0.29, 0.69], P=0.0002, I2 =0%); (MD=-0.24, 95%CI [-0.32, -0.17], P< 0.0000, I2 =0%)). Moreover, follow-up of the enrolled patients for a minimum of three to six months resulted in no reported thromboembolic instances, suggesting a negligible risk for thromboembolism among patients undergoing LSG and receiving TXA. In conclusion, tranexamic acid demonstrates a robust safety and efficacy profile for its use in patients undergoing LSG, with no reported instances of thromboembolism. Variations in TXA administration regimens, bleeding definitions, procedural techniques, and potential confounding medications could not be accounted for, necessitating additional large-scale RCTs to address and bridge knowledge gaps.
RESUMO
Introduction When COVID-19 vaccination started, there was little data on the safety of immunization against COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. Previous studies revealed no safety concerns for pregnant women or newborns who received a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on pregnant women and on perinatal outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in a maternity hospital in King Saud Medical City. It started in January 2022 and ended in June 2022. The questionnaire was developed and validated by experts. This study included all women admitted to the postpartum ward who were more than 18 years old and had received the COVID-19 vaccine. The study excluded women who had no proof of their vaccination status or who could not complete the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on gestational age and birth weight. The secondary outcomes included the development of polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, mode of delivery, Apgar score, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Results A total of 365 pregnant women participated in this study. The mean gestational age of the unvaccinated women was 38.83 ± 1.62 weeks, which was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of vaccinated women (37.69 ± 2.9 weeks). In addition, the average birth weight for the unvaccinated women was 2.96 ± 0.4 kg, which did not differ significantly (p = 0.89) from that of vaccinated women (2.97 ± 0.66 kg). Conclusion COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the type of vaccine received before, during, or after pregnancy, is not associated with any unfavorable perinatal outcomes for pregnant women or neonates.