Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Lab ; 60(6): 1027-34, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016709

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Numerous molecular-based tests were applied for the laboratory-based diagnosis of viruses. In this cross-sectional case control study, in addition to bacteria, we aimed to determine respiratory viruses using, for the first time in our country, the Reverse Transcription PCR DNA Microarray method, and we also aimed to evaluate its diagnostic performance. METHODS: Respiratory viruses were investigated from nasopharyngeal swabs of 76 patients diagnosed with atypical pneumonia and 64 healthy controls using the CLART Pneumovir (Genomica, Spain) kit and from 10 mL blood samples of the same subjects. M. pneumoniae IgM was detected by ELISA and L. pneumophila IgM and C. pneumoniae IgM by indirect immunofluorescence. Person's chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Our results showed that the specificity (100%) and the positive predictive value (100%) of the CLART Pneumovir kit were high, but its sensitivity (53%), its negative predictive value (64%), and its kappa value (50%) were low. Parainfluenza Virus type 3 and M. pneumoniae were found alone or together as the most common microorganisms while no cases of human bocavirus, adenovirus, rhinovirus, or coronavirus were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that, during the study period, most of our patients had atypical pneumonia due to Parainfluenza Virus type 3 and M. pneumoniae co-infection.


Assuntos
Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Nasofaringe/virologia , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Pneumonia/virologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/microbiologia , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/virologia , Vírus/classificação , Vírus/genética , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Lab ; 60(11): 1879-86, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25648030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaerobic bacteria play an important role in eye infections; however, there is limited epidemiologic data based on the the role of these bacteria in the etiology of keratitis and endophthalmitis. The aim of this re- search is to determine the prevalence of anaerobic bacteria in perforated corneal ulcers of patients with keratitis and endophthalmitis and to evaluate their antimicrobial susceptibilities. METHODS: Corneal scrapings were taken by the ophthalmologist using sterile needles. For the isolation of anaerobic bacteria, samples were inoculated on specific media and were incubated under anaerobic conditions obtained with Anaero-Gen (Oxoid & Mitsubishi Gas Company) in anaerobic jars (Oxoid USA, Inc. Columbia, MD, USA). The molecular identification of anaerobic bacteria was performed by multiplex PCR and the susceptibilities of an- aerobic bacteria to penicillin, chloramphenicol, and clindamycin were determined with the E test (bioMerieux). RESULTS: 51 strains of anaerobic bacteria belonging to four different genuses were detected by multiplex PCR and only 46 strains were isolated by culture. All of them were found susceptible to chloramphenicol whereas penicillin resistance was found in 13.3% of P.anaerobius strains, clindamycin resistance was found in 34.8% of P.acnes and 13.3% of P. anaerobius strains. Additionnaly, one strain of P. granulosum was found resistant to clindamycin, one strain of B. fragilis and one strain of P.melaninogenica were found resistant to penicillin and clindamycin. CONCLUSIONS: Routine analyses of anaerobes in perforated corneal ulcers is inevitable and usage of appropriate molecular methods, for the detection of bacteria responsible from severe infections which might not be deter- mined by cultivation, may serve for the early decision of the appropriate treatment. Taking into account the in- creasing antimicrobial resistance of anaerobic bacteria, alternative eye specific antibiotics effective against anaer- obes are needed to achieve a successful treatment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Anaeróbias/isolamento & purificação , Perfuração da Córnea/microbiologia , Úlcera da Córnea/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Endoftalmite/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/microbiologia , Ceratite/microbiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Adulto , Bactérias Anaeróbias/classificação , Bactérias Anaeróbias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Anaeróbias/genética , Perfuração da Córnea/diagnóstico , Perfuração da Córnea/tratamento farmacológico , Perfuração da Córnea/epidemiologia , Úlcera da Córnea/diagnóstico , Úlcera da Córnea/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera da Córnea/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Endoftalmite/diagnóstico , Endoftalmite/tratamento farmacológico , Endoftalmite/epidemiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ceratite/diagnóstico , Ceratite/tratamento farmacológico , Ceratite/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Turquia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...