The Association of Corticosteroid Therapy With Mortality and Length of Stay Among Children With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction Septic shock remains a leading cause of mortality in pediatric patients. Corticosteroids have been used in the management of sepsis and septic shock, but there is conflicting evidence on the potential benefit of corticosteroid therapy. This study assessed the risk of mortality and length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) among pediatric patients admitted with a septic shock diagnosis. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted among pediatric patients (up to 14 years old) admitted with a septic shock diagnosis to the PICU of King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital in Riyadh from January 2016 to December 2021. The clinical outcomes of patients receiving corticosteroid therapy were compared to those of control patients who were not given corticosteroids. Electronic medical records provided clinical data, severity scores, and the management given for each patient. The patients were followed up from the date of sepsis diagnosis to hospital discharge. Proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare the risk of mortality, length of PICU stay, and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 182 pediatric patients were included in the study, and 86 (47%) received corticosteroid therapy. The median age of the study population was 15 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-72 months). Compared to the controls, the patients who received corticosteroids had a higher total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (mean±SD: 5.5±3 vs. 7.1±3.3, respectively; p <0.01) and required more ventilation support (72% vs. 28%, respectively) and the use of inotropes and vasopressors (74% vs. 34% and 32% vs. 6%, respectively). In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between the groups (adjusted HR: 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-10.28). Those patients who received corticosteroids had 42% less risk of staying in the PICU for over six days than those not receiving steroids (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.98) Conclusion After adjusting for baseline characteristics, severity scores, and medical intervention, no association was found between receiving corticosteroids and mortality (p=0.492). Furthermore, patients who received corticosteroids had less risk of a prolonged stay in the PICU than those who did not.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients with Severe COVID-19 and the Association between the Dose of Anticoagulants and Outcomes.

Introduction: COVID-19 is characterized by a procoagulant state that increases the risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. The dose of anticoagulants in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia without suspected or confirmed thrombosis has been debated. Aim of the study: We evaluated the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and assessed the association between the dose of anticoagulants and outcomes. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort included patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU between March and July 2020. Patients with clinically suspected and confirmed VTE were compared to those not diagnosed to have VTE. Results: The study enrolled 310 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: age 60.0±15.1 years, 67.1% required mechanical ventilation and 44.7% vasopressors. Most (97.1%) patients received anticoagulants during ICU stay: prophylactic unfractionated heparin (N=106), standard-dose enoxaparin (N=104) and intermediate-dose enoxaparin (N=57). Limb Doppler ultrasound was performed for 49 (15.8%) patients and chest computed tomographic angiography for 62 (20%). VTE was diagnosed in 41 (13.2%) patients; 20 patients had deep vein thrombosis and 23 had acute pulmonary embolism. Patients with VTE had significantly higher D-dimer on ICU admission. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, intermediate-dose enoxaparin versus standard-dose unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin was associated with lower VTE risk (hazard ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.74) and lower risk of the composite outcome of VTE or hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.78; p=0.006). Major bleeding was not different between the intermediate- and prophylactic-dose heparin groups. Conclusions: In our study, clinically suspected and confirmed VTE was diagnosed in 13.2% of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intermediate-dose enoxaparin versus standard-dose unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin was associated with decreased risk of VTE or hospital mortality.

A Young Man With Acute Kidney Injury and Uveitis: An Unusual Presentation and Case Report.

Tubulointerstitial nephritis with uveitis (TINU) is an uncommon autoimmune syndrome that involves multiple systems. It usually presents with acute kidney injury (AKI) and unilateral or bilateral uveitis. We present a 15-year-old male, fit and well, who attended emergency room (ER) with a four-month history of epigastric pain associated with nausea, vomiting, and weight loss of 10 kg. Initial clinical and laboratory evaluation confirmed AKI. A diagnostic kidney biopsy confirmed acute tubulointerstitial nephritis, and a slit-lamp examination confirmed acute left anterior uveitis consistent with a diagnosis of TINU. He was initially treated with corticosteroids which resulted in prompt resolution of AKI; however, uveitis persisted necessitating the addition of further immunosuppressants.