A prospective cohort study evaluating subjective and objective neurosensory changes following LeFort I osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the incidence and recovery of neurosensory deficit (NSD) after LeFort I osteotomy over 12 months and identify any association between age, gender, and extent of surgical movement on recovery. Furthermore, the study explored the relationship between objective and subjective outcome measures. METHODS: A prospective cohort study consisting of 31 patients. Subjects were assessed at baseline, 1 week (T1), 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (T5) after LeFort I osteotomy. Objective assessment measures included pinprick (PP), static light touch (SLT), static 2-point discrimination (STPD), and electric pulp testing (EPT). Subjective reporting was undertaken using a visual analog scale. Patients rated the impact of NSD on intraoral and extraoral sites at the same time points as for objective measures. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (16 females and 12 males) with a mean age of 24.5 years (standard deviation, 7.4) completed the study. There was a notable reduction in NSD from T1 (85.7%) to T5 (17.9%). No significant differences were found with respect to the influence of gender; PP (P = 0.06), SLT (P = 0.10), STPD (P = 0.65) and EPT (P = 0.19) or extent of surgical movement; PP (P = 0.50), SLT (P = 0.72), STPD (P = 0.06) and EPT (P = 0.74) on NSD. Age is a significant factor for intraoral NSD in the immediate postoperative period; PP (P < 0.0001) and SLT (P < 0.0001). Subjectively, patients reported a high degree of concern associated with NSD immediately after surgery with a gradual reduction from T1 to T5. There is a significant difference in subjective reporting between those with intraoral NSD than those with no intraoral NSD at 12 months (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: NSD is high after LeFort I surgery, particularly intraorally in the palate. At 12 months, the incidence of NSD is 17.9%. Recovery of NSD to a nonsignificant value from baseline takes up to 3 months for extraoral sites and between 3 and 6 months for intraoral soft tissues. The maxillary dentition continues to recover from NSD up to 12 months postsurgery. Age, gender, and extent of the surgical movement do not influence the extent of NSD at 12 months. Increasing age is associated with increased NSD at intraoral sites immediately after surgery. Intraoral NSD is more of a concern to patients than extraoral NSD. Patients' concerns associated with NSD reduced over time, demonstrating a degree of adaptation in the longer term.

Establishing a clinical psychology team within the orthognathic service: A triad model of orthodontic, maxillofacial and psychological care.

The importance of psychological support for orthognathic patients has taken an increasing precedence over recent years and is embedded in orthognathic commissioning guidelines. Furthermore, attention towards mental health-related conditions and their management is of prime importance and continues to be a key area of focus within healthcare settings. With this in mind, this paper aims to outline our experience of establishing a need for and subsequently securing funding to establish a clinical psychology service within an existing orthognathic service in the NHS. The information outlined may be of benefit to orthognathic teams seeking to secure such psychological support within their respective units.

Incidence and impact of previous orthodontic treatment in patients attending orthognathic combined clinics: a survey.

This prospective questionnaire-based study was designed to determine the incidence of patients attending orthognathic combined clinics who have previously had orthodontic treatment, and to assess the impact, if any, this has had on their proposed surgical treatment. Contemporaneous and historical data from consecutive patients at different stages of treatment who were attending clinics at two London hospitals during a three-month period were included. In total 22/56 patients (39%) had previously had orthodontic treatment, and of those, it had had an undesirable effect on the current management of 10 (45%). The effects included a reduced range of dental movements available to orthodontists (8/23, 35%), undesirable extractions (5/23, 22%), and a prolonging of preoperative orthodontics (5/23, 22%). The median age at which previous orthodontic treatment had been started was 13.5 (range 11-26). Nearly a third of patients reported that they had not been advised by their referring practitioner that a combined orthodontic and surgical approach might be required. The study suggests that preliminary assessment should be improved. Patients should be informed about and prevented from undergoing orthodontic treatment that may limit future surgical management, otherwise they may have to face repeated and prolonged orthodontic treatment, unexpected operations, and potential limitations to the outcome of surgical treatment. This could be achieved through the training and education of all practitioners and the development of referral guidelines.

Use of the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective?

The alar base cinch suture is often used to mitigate the unfavourable increase in nasal width after Le Fort I impaction or advancement of the maxilla. Recently a number of studies have looked at the stability and clinical outcome of this intervention. We investigated the effect of an alar base cinch suture on the change in width of the alar base after Le Fort I osteotomy using a three-dimensional imaging system. Twenty-eight patients were prospectively randomised into an intervention group where a cinch suture was used, and a control group. The width of the alar base was measured before operation, and then at one, and six months. At six months it had increased from baseline by a median of 2mm in all patients. The median increase was greater in the control group than in the cinch placement group, but the difference was small. The range in both groups was large, indicating great individual variability. There was an overall reduction in the width of the alar base between one and six months after operation, which indicated some resolution of soft tissue oedema associated with the operation, but the median reduction was small and unlikely to be clinically significant. The preliminary findings suggest that the suture confers little benefit in controlling the width of the alar base of the nose after Le Fort I osteotomy. More recently it has been suggested that procedures using a modified cinch suture may result in greater stability.

Maxillary calcifying epithelial odontogenic (Pindborg) tumor presenting with abnormal eye signs: case report and literature review.

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors (CEOT) are uncommon, accounting for less than 1% of all odontogenic tumors. The CEOT, since its description by Pindborg in 1958 as a separate pathologic entity, is commonly known as the Pindborg tumor. We present an unusual case of such a tumor in the maxilla presenting with abnormal eye signs. The case demonstrates the use of a Le Fort I down-fracture osteotomy approach to maxillary tumors.

Anterior transmandibular osteodistraction: clinical and model observations.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to study the effect of transmandibular distraction on the periodontal and dental structures, and the initial movements of the mandibular halves, when using an axial plane non-rigid bone-borne distractor (TMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen patients undergoing bimaxillary transverse osteodistraction had their six lower anterior teeth assessed for mobility, sensitivity, and pocket depth. Recordings were made pre-operatively, post-distraction, post-consolidation and at 1-year follow-up. Selected landmarks on pre-operative and post-consolidation models were also digitised in three dimensions to study individual tooth movements, and positional changes of the mandibular halves. RESULTS: Pockets depths around the incisor teeth increased during the consolidation period (probably due to reduced oral hygiene), but returned to normal by the 1-year post-operative consultation. Tooth mobility increased temporarily in the active phase (central incisors, lateral incisors) and in the consolidation phase (lateral incisors, canine teeth). Sensitivity to cold was temporarily lost in the incisor teeth, probably as a result of 'apical contusion'. One central incisor was inadvertently apically osteotomized and needed root canal treatment. The angle between the mandibular halves closed by 9.4 degrees. CONCLUSION: Periodontal and dental morbidity is transient and limited to the distraction and consolidation period, as long as the tooth apices are avoided when the osteotomy is performed. A step-design osteotomy may be preferable when the central incisor apices are close to each other. The transmandibular distractor (TMD) allows for rotation at the temporomandibular joints.