A Comparison of the Checklist Scoring Systems, Global Rating Systems, and Borderline Regression Method for an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for a Small Cohort in a Saudi Medical School.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using the checklist and global rating scores to evaluate the clinical competency of medical students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Additionally, the study assesses the appropriateness of using the borderline regression method to set standards for small-scale OSCE exams and determines if the estimated passing marks differ significantly from the university's prefixed passing score of 70%. The study also examines whether the university should utilize the borderline regression method to determine passing scores for each OSCE exam instead of a set passing score. METHODS: The study analyzed medical students' grades in 11 OSCE exams in the 2022-2023 academic year at Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Students received family medicine clerkship rotations, and after each rotation, they took an OSCE exam consisting of three stations that family medicine consultants graded. The exam included a checklist of 30 tasks and a five-level global rank scale. The study collected all the checklist marks and global rank grades and analyzed them using IBM® Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS® Statistics) software. The statistical tests used were descriptive statistics, the T-test, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: The study showed that students were more likely to pass when using the global rating system than the checklist scoring system. Additionally, students had a significantly lower passing rate when using the higher cut-off passing score estimated using the borderline regression method compared to the pre-set passing score of 70% established by the university (with a p-value of 0.00). CONCLUSION: Each scoring system has advantages and disadvantages, but they complement each other. Combining scoring systems can produce a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of a candidate's performance. The study also emphasizes the importance of carefully selecting and validating cut-off points in OSCE exams to ensure fairness and consistency in assessment.

Infant With Pseudohypoparathyroidism Type 1a, Misdiagnosed as Congenital Hypothyroidism.

Background: Hypothyroidism is a manifestation of multi-hormonal resistance in pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia (PHP Ia). Objective: The aim of this article was to present 9 months old male patient as case of congenital hypothyroidism. Case report: We describe a 9 months old male diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism at age 1.5 month, who developed later (at age 5 months) cyanotic attack associated with hypocalcaemia, hyperphosphatemia, and hyperparathyroidism, patient had typical characters of AHO, so the diagnosis of Pseudohypoparathyroidism 1a associated with resistance (TSH) was established. Conclusion: Children diagnosed with PHP 1a should be further evaluated for associated resistance endocrinopathies. The literature on pseudohypoparathyroidism is reviewed with special emphasis on the misdiagnosis with congenital hypothyroidism.

Unusual Presentation of Diffuse Axonal Injury: A Case Report.

Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is the microscopic axonal injury in the brain's neural pathways, corpus callosum, and brainstem, which has been linked to a major increase in morbidity and mortality. Patients present acutely with no lucid interval, abnormal pupil response, and decerebrate or decorticate posture. In this case report, we report on an 11-year-old girl who was agitated, crying, vomiting, had one episode of seizure, and had poor communication as a result of a high-risk mechanism side-impact motor vehicle collision (MVC).

Utilization of scrotal orchidopexy for palpable undescended testes among surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Scrotal orchidopexy for palpable undescended testicle (UDT) has received attention in the last decade due to its lower morbidity. This study was conducted to determine the frequency and factors related to the use of the scrotal approach in the surgical treatment of palpable UDT among surgeons. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was carried out using an online survey, which was sent to different pediatric urologists, pediatric surgeons, and urologists groups. The survey consisted of questions on demographics as well as surgeons opinions and experience toward scrotal orchidopexy. RESULTS: Of 163 respondents, 57 (35.0%) were pediatric surgeons, 98 (60.1%) were pediatric urologists, and 8 (4.9%) were urologists. There were 86 respondents (52.8%) who used the scrotal orchidopexy approach for UDT at any time in their practice. Pediatric urologists tended to use the scrotal orchidopexy approach for UDT more significantly than others (P < 0.001). There were significantly more scrotal orchidopexies for UDT performed by the pediatric urologists throughout their practice and per year compared to others, respectively (P < 0.001). Fifty-two respondents (31.9%) claimed that scrotal orchidopexy is not a good option for their patients, while seven respondents (4.3%) claimed that the procedure was hard to perform. DISCUSSION: Based on the results of this study, we believe that there is a discrepancy in the reported advantages and success rate of scrotal orchidopexy in the published literature and the utilization of such an approach among surgeons managing palpable UDT in children. CONCLUSION: Scrotal orchidopexy is an underutilized approach in the management of palpable UDT in children. Only 52.8% of our respondents used it for UDT. One of the main reasons why scrotal orchidopexy is underutilized is due to the surgeons' perception that scrotal orchidopexy is not the procedure of choice for their patients and their unfamiliarity with the procedure.

The incidence of trocar-site hernia in minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a comparison of multi versus single-port laparoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Single-port laparoscopy (SPL) employs a 1.5- to 2.5-cm incision at the umbilicus for the placement of a single working port. We hypothesized that the longer incision created by SPL compared with multiport laparoscopy may increase the incidence of trocar-site hernias. We examined our experience with SPL in bariatric operations. METHODS: There were 734 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedures performed at our institution between 2001 and 2011. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up or had a short duration of follow-up (<1 month). Of the remaining 676 cases, 163 were performed via SPL. All laparoscopic wounds created by trocar size greater than 12 mm were closed with absorbable suture. RESULTS: Patient demographics of the SPL group and the multiport group were similar in terms of age, gender, and comorbidities. The average body mass index (BMI) of the SPL group was lower than the multiport group (43.5 ± 5.3 vs. 45.8 ± 7.7, p < 0.01). The mean follow-up for the SPL group was 11 months versus 24 months for the multiport group. There were three trocar-site hernias out of 513 cases in the multiport compared to one hernia out of 163 cases in the SPL group (0.6 vs. 0.6 %, p = 0.967). All trocar-site hernias occurred at the 15-mm port site. The median time to hernia occurrence for the multiport group was 13 months (range, 1-18). In the SPL group, the hernia occurred at 8 months. On multivariate analysis, age, BMI, SPL, procedure type, and the postoperative weight loss were not associated with the development of trocar-site hernias. CONCLUSIONS: SPL did not increase the rate of trocar-site hernia in this series. A low rate of trocar-site hernia can be achieved with the use of SPL in bariatric surgery.