Differential effect of pioglitazone (PGZ) and rosiglitazone (RGZ) on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Postprandial metabolism is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2Dm). Two thiazolidinediones pioglitazone (PGZ) and rosiglitazone (RGZ) have similar effects on glycaemic control but differ in their effects on fasting lipids. This study investigated the effects of RGZ and PGZ on postprandial metabolism in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. METHODS: Seventeen patients with T2Dm were randomized to RGZ or PGZ for 12 weeks, with an 8-week wash-out period. Fasting blood samples were taken for glucose (FPG), insulin, HbA(1c), lipids, apolipoproteins (apo), lipoprotein (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL), and cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) activity. A standardized breakfast was served and postprandial glucose, insulin, and lipid subfraction profiles were determined. RESULTS: RGZ and PGZ treatment resulted in a similar improvement in FPG, HbA(1c) and homeostasis model assessment. Fasting and postprandial triglyceride (TG) levels were significantly lower following PGZ therapy (fasting: -0.35 vs 0.44 mmol/L; p < 0.04; postprandial AUC-TG: -195.6 vs 127.9 mmol/L/min; p < 0.02) associated with changes in VLDL-2-TG (-0.10 vs 0.21 mmol/L; p = 0.23) and VLDL-3-TG (0.0 vs 0.34 mmol/L; p < 0.04). Fasting cholesterol increased with RGZ compared to PGZ (0.06 vs 0.59 mmol/L; p < 0.04), particularly in VLDL-2-C (-0.30 vs 0.59 mmol/L; p < 0.03) and VLDL-3-C (-0.85 vs 2.11 mmol/L; p < 0.02). Postprandial VLDL lipid and protein content increased after RGZ and decreased after PGZ. Fasting apoB, apoA-I, apoC-II/C-III-ratio, and LPL activity did not differ. CETP activity decreased after RGZ and increased after PGZ (-6.2 vs 4.2 p/mol/mL/min; p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Both the glitazones had similar effects on glucose metabolism. The additional beneficial effect of PGZ on lipid metabolism may be related to its effects on insulin-independent VLDL production and CETP activity.

Assessment of quality of life in patients with uncontrolled vs. controlled acromegaly using the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL).

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a chronic disease with an important impact on quality of life. An acromegaly disease-generated quality of life questionnaire (AcroQoL) has recently been developed. We aimed to confirm reliability, construct validity and disease-specificity of the AcroQoL questionnaire. Second, we investigated the effect of remission status on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acromegaly. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Using a prospective, cross-sectional design, 33 patients with treated acromegaly and 22 patients with treated hormone-inactive pituitary adenoma under stable replacement therapy completed the German version of the AcroQoL questionnaire. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha analysis showed high reliability of the total score and the different scales and subscales in patients with acromegaly (alpha ranging from 0.83 to 0.93, item-total correlation 0.41-0.84). Patients with hormone-inactive pituitary adenoma showed lower reliability (alpha ranging from 0.17 to 0.75). Exploratory factor analysis in patients with acromegaly suggested a two-factorial solution with item distribution largely matching the scaling of the original Spanish questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis revealed significantly lower results of the total score and the different scales and subscales (indicating worse HRQoL) in patients with persistent acromegalic activity compared to patients with acromegaly in remission or discordant remission status. Consistently, IGF-I was an independent negative predictor of the different scores of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The AcroQoL questionnaire represents a reliable, construct valid and disease-specific tool for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with acromegaly. Patients with biochemically uncontrolled acromegaly showed significantly lower HRQoL than patients with acromegaly in remission or discordant remission status.