Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.

Optimizing tactical fitness is important for combat readiness and injury prevention, especially as women have entered ground combat military occupational specialties. OBJECTIVES: To assess characteristics of male and female Marines by Combat Fitness Test (CFT) performance clusters. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Anthropometric, body composition (BF%, fat and fat-free mass [FM and FFM], and Fight load index [FLI], physiological (maximal oxygen uptake, lactate threshold and anaerobic power/capacity), and musculoskeletal (isokinetic strength of the knee, shoulder, torso, and isometric strength of the ankle) assessments were obtained from 294 male (M) and female (F) Marines. Hierarchical cluster analysis classified Marines based on performance of two CFT events (sec): Maneuver Under Fire (MANUF) and Movement to Contact (MTC). Following tests for normality, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis tests, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests, assessed characteristics across clusters and sex (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Two clusters (C) were determined: C1: N=66F, 16M and C2: N=18F, 194M, with C2 demonstrating better performance on the MANUF and MTC. C1F demonstrated significantly greater BF% and FLI than C1M, C2F, and C2M. C2M demonstrated significantly greater knee flexion strength than C1F and C2F, but C1M was only significantly greater than C1F. C2M demonstrated significantly greater ankle eversion and inversion strength than C1F. CONCLUSIONS: Women with increased BF%, increased FM and reduced FFM relative to a fighting load may have decreased performance in combat-related tasks. Training programs based on an individual Marine's baseline body composition and fitness characteristics can enhance combat fitness and force readiness.

Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.

Women can serve in all military occupational specialties (MOS); however, musculoskeletal and physiological characteristics that predict successful completion of ground combat MOS schools by female Marines are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine which demographic, musculoskeletal, and physiological characteristics predict graduation from infantry and vehicle ground combat MOS schools in female Marines. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Prior to MOS school, the following were assessed in 62 female Marines (22.0±3.0yrs, 163.9±5.8cm, 63.4±7.2kg): isokinetic shoulder, trunk, and knee and isometric ankle strength; body composition; anaerobic power (AP)/capacity (AC); maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max); and field-based fitness tests (broad jump, medicine ball throw, pro-agility). Both absolute and normalized (%body mass: %BM) values were utilized for strength, AP, AC, and VO2max. Select tests from each Marine's most recent Physical Fitness Test (PFT: abdominal crunches, 3-mile run time) and Combat Fitness Test (CFT: Maneuver Under Fire, Movement to Contact) were recorded. Participants were classified as graduated (N=46) or did not graduate (N=16). Simple logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of MOS school graduation. Statistical significance was set a priori at α=0.05. RESULTS: Absolute and normalized ankle inversion and eversion strength, normalized anaerobic capacity, absolute and normalized VO2max, right pro-agility, and PFT 3-mile run time significantly predicted MOS school graduation (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Greater ankle strength, better agility, and greater anaerobic and aerobic capacity are important for successful completion of ground combat MOS school in female Marines. Prior to entering ground combat MOS school, it is recommended that female Marines should train to optimize these mobility-centric characteristics.