Influence of Age and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Vestibular Neuritis: Retrospective Cohort Study.

To analyze the influence of age and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in the evolution of vestibular neuritis (VN). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. VN-diagnosed patients were included and divided into two groups: those with and without CVRFs. We analyzed the mean vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, measured through the video head impulse test (vHIT) at the diagnosis and one-year follow-up. We conducted a factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effect of age, sex, and CVRFs in the mean VOR gain. RESULTS: Sixty-three VN-diagnosed patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean VOR gain between both groups. However, in the subgroup analysis, there were statistically significant differences when comparing the mean VOR gain at the one-year follow-up between the group over 55 years of age 0.77 ± 0.20 and the group under 55 years 0.87 ± 0.15 (p = 0.036). Additionally, the factorial ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of age group on the mean VOR gain at the one-year follow-up (p = 0.018), and it also found a significant interaction between the factors of gender, age group, HTN (p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: CVRFs do not independently affect the mean VOR gain in VN patients' follow-ups. However, age significantly impacts VOR gain in VN and could be modulated by gender and hypertension.

Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. RESULTS: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids.

Early Diagnosis of Central Disorders Mimicking Horizontal Canal Cupulolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Horizontal Canal Cupulolithiasis (hc-BPPV-cu) can mimic a pathology of central origin, so a careful examination is essential to prevent misdiagnosis. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of 45 patients suffering from suspected hc-BPPV-cu. We recorded whether patients first presented through an ENT Emergency Department (ED) or through an Outpatient Otolaryngology Clinic (OC). RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the OC versus the ED in relation to the time between symptom onset and first assessment (79.7 vs. 3.6 days, respectively), the number of therapeutic maneuvers (one maneuver in 62.5% vs. 75.9%, and more than one in 25.1% vs. 13.7%), and multi-canal BPPV rate (43.8% vs. 3.4%). hc-BPPV-cu did not resolve in 2 patients (12.5%) from the OC and in 3 (10.3%) from de ED, all of which showed central pathology. DISCUSSION: There are no prior studies that analyze the approach to hc-BPPV-cu in the ED. The benefits of early specialist input are early identification of central positional nystagmus, a decrease in symptom duration, reduced number of therapeutic maneuvers required for symptom resolution, and lower rates of iatrogenic multi-canal BPPV. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive approach to hc-BPPV-cu in the ED allows both more effective treatment and early identification of central disorder mimics.

Impacto de la enfermedad de pequeño vaso en la inestabilidad del anciano. Estudio descriptivo transversal / Vestibular Pathology and Instability in the Elderly and its Relationship with Small Vessel Disease. Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Introducción y objetivo: La elevada prevalencia de mareo e inestabilidad en los ancianos, su complejo diagnóstico e importantes consecuencias (caídas y lesiones derivadas) constituyen un grave problema sanitario. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo principal determinar si existe relación entre dichos síntomas y la presencia de enfermedad de pequeño vaso. Secundariamente intentaremos describir las causas más frecuentes de mareo e inestabilidad en los pacientes ancianos. Método: Se realiza un estudio descriptivo transversal con 214 pacientes mayores de 70 años remitidos por vértigo, mareo o inestabilidad. Se valoran los diagnósticos más frecuentes y se comparan tres grupos: 1) Patología vestibular periférica, 2) mareo o inestabilidad de causa desconocida y 3) grupo de control. Para ello se utiliza la escala de Fazekas que determina la magnitud de las lesiones de sustancia blanca por imágenes de resonancia magnética. Resultados: El vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno fue el diagnóstico más frecuente (17,3%), seguido de la enfermedad de Ménière (15%). Un 20% de los pacientes fueron clasificados como origen desconocido o multifactorial. La enfermedad de pequeño vaso se encontró con mayor frecuencia en el grupo con mareo de causas desconocidas (p=0,034). Conclusiones: se reafirma la asociación entre las lesiones de sustancia blanca, sugerentes de enfermedad de pequeño vaso, y la mayor aparición de mareo e inestabilidad en los ancianos; siendo la prevalencia de la enfermedad mucho menor en el grupo de control que en aquellos con mareo de causa desconocida. Asimismo, se determina que el vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno es el diagnóstico más frecuente de mareo e inestabilidad en el anciano. (AU)

Hearing loss in vestibular schwannoma

Introducción y objetivo: La hipoacusia es uno de los síntomas más frecuentes en el debut de un schwannoma vestibular (SV). El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la pérdida auditiva en pacientes con SV y determinar en qué medida se relaciona con el tamaño tumoral. Método: Se lleva a cabo un estudio retrospectivo observacional en 291 pacientes diagnosticados de SV entre 1995 y 2017 en el servicio de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía Cervicofacial del Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca analizándose diferentes datos pre y postoperatorios de los pacientes así como hallazgos radiológicos y quirúrgicos.Resultados: El síntoma más frecuente de consulta es la hipoacusia unilateral progresiva (31.6%). La asociación entre el tamaño del SV y la hipoacusia no es estadísticamente significativa (p=0.099).Conclusiones: La pérdida auditiva producida por un SV no es patrimonio de ningún estadio, aunque las pérdidas severas y profundas son más indicativas de neurinomas grados III-IV, y ante una pérdida auditiva leve o audición normal tendremos con más probabilidad un neurinoma grado I-II. (AU)

The most common reason for consultation in patients suffering from Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) is progressive hearing loss. The main objective of this study is analyzing the hearing loss in patients with VS and determining the extent to which the tumor grade and the hearing loss are related. Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted with a sample of 291 patients diag-nosed with VS between 1995 and 2017 in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery of the Tertiary Care Primary Center of Salamanca. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative data from patients with VS as well as radiological and surgical findings. Results: The most common reason for consultation at diagnosis was progressive unilateral hearing loss (31.6%). The relationship between the size of the VS and hearing loss in the patients who reported progressive unilateral hearing loss as a reason for consultation was not statistically significant (p=0.099). Conclusion: The most common reason for consultation in VS is progressive unilateral hearing loss. The hearing loss caused by VS does not have a statistically significant association with any tumor grade, although severe and profound hearing loss is more commonly associated with grade III-IV neurinomas, whereas mild hearing loss or normal hearing are more likely in grade I-II tumors. (AU)