Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(2): 238-244, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242140

RESUMO

Rationale: Laryngeal edema is a known complication of endotracheal intubation that may cause airway obstruction upon extubation. The only test available to predict this complication is the cuff leak test (CLT). Objectives: Given the uncertainty of the CLT's clinical utility, we conducted the COMIC (Cuff Leak Test and Airway Obstruction in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients) pilot study to examine the feasibility of undertaking a larger trial. Methods: COMIC is a multicentered, parallel-group randomized trial performed in Canada, Saudi Arabia, and Poland. We enrolled mechanically ventilated adults admitted to the intensive care unit who were deemed ready for extubation. Those allocated to the intervention arm had the results of their CLT communicated to the healthcare team, who then decided to proceed with extubation or not. In those randomized to the control arm, the CLT results were not communicated to the healthcare team and patients were extubated, regardless of the CLT result. The primary outcomes focused on feasibility. Results: One hundred patients (56 in the intervention and 44 in the control arm) were enrolled. All feasibility criteria were met, including 1) recruitment rate of 7.6 patients/month, 2) consent rate of 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.1-94.5%), and 3) protocol adherence of 98% (95% CI, 95-100%). There were two episodes of clinically significant stridor in the intervention group and four patients who required reintubation in each group. Conclusions: The results of the COMIC pilot trial support the feasibility of a larger trial to determine the effect of the CLT on reintubation and clinically important stridor.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03372707).


Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Extubação/métodos , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/etiologia , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos
2.
Saudi J Med Med Sci ; 9(3): 215-222, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34667467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) decreases the need for endotracheal intubation (EI) in different respiratory failure causes. While HFNC is used in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) under weak recommendations, its efficacy remains to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to examine HFNC efficacy in preventing EI among COVID-19 patients with AHRF. Secondary objectives were to determine predictors of HFNC success/failure, mortality rate, and length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia from April to August 2020. Adult patients admitted to the ICU with AHRF secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia and managed with HFNC were included. We excluded patients who were intubated or managed with non-invasive ventilation before HFNC. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received HFNC for a median duration of 3 days (interquartile range, 1-5 days). The mean age was 57 ± 14 years, and 86% were men. HFNC failure and EI occurred in 29 (66%) patients. Patients in whom HNFC treatment failed had a higher risk of death (52% versus 0%; P = 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, a high SOFA score and a low ROX index were significantly associated with HFNC failure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.93; P = 0.025; and HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of hypoxemic COVID-19 patients who received HFNC did not require intubation. High SOFA score and low ROX index were associated with HFNC failure.

3.
SAGE Open Med ; 9: 20503121211001144, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33796296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of Acinetobacter baumannii infection is considered a challenge especially in an intensive care setting. The resistance rate makes it difficult to manage and is believed to lead to higher mortality. We aim to investigate the prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii and explore how different antibiotic regimens could impact patient outcomes as there are no available published data to reflect our population in our region. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all infected adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit at King Fahad University Hospital with a confirmed laboratory diagnosis of Acinetobacter baumannii from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2017. Positive cultures were obtained from the microbiology department and those meeting the inclusive criteria were selected. Variables were analyzed using descriptive analysis and cross-tabulation. Results were further reviewed and audited by blinded co-authors. RESULTS: A comprehensive review of data identified 198 patients with Acinetobacter baumannii. The prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii is 3.37%, and the overall mortality rate is 40.81%. Our sample consisted mainly of male patients, that is, 68.7%, with a mean age of 49 years, and the mean age of female patients was 56 years. The mean age of survivors was less than that of non-survivors, that is, 44.95 years of age. We observed that prior antibiotic use was higher in non-survivors compared to survivors. From the review of treatment provided for patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii, 65 were treated with colistin alone, 18 were treated with carbapenems, and 22 were treated with a combination of both carbapenems and colistin. The mean length of stay of Acinetobacter baumannii-infected patients was 20.25 days. We found that the survival rates among patients who received carbapenems were higher compared to those who received colistin.Conclusion:: We believe that multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is prevalent and associated with a higher mortality rate and represents a challenging case for every intensive care unit physician. Further prospective studies are needed.

4.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 65(8): 1087-1094, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169641

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The cuff leak test (CLT) is used to assess laryngeal edema prior to extubation. There is limited evidence for its diagnostic accuracy and conflicting guidelines surrounding its use in critically ill patients who do not have risk factors for laryngeal edema. The primary study aim was to describe intensivists' beliefs, attitudes, and practice regarding the use of the CLT. METHODS: A 13-item survey was developed, pilot-tested, and subjected to clinical sensibility testing. The survey was distributed electronically through MetaClinician®. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analysis were performed to examine associations between participant demographics and survey responses. RESULTS: 1184 practicing intensivists from 17 countries in North and South America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia participated. The majority (59%) of respondents reported rarely or never perform the CLT prior to extubating patients not at high risk of laryngeal edema, which correlated with 54% of respondents reporting they believed a failed CLT did not predict reintubation. Intensivists from the Middle East were 2.4 times more likely to request a CLT compared to those from North America. Intensivists with base training in medicine or emergency medicine were more likely to request a CLT prior to extubation compared to those with base training in anesthesiology. CONCLUSION: Use of the CLT prior to extubating patients not at high risk of laryngeal edema in the intensive care unit is highly variable. Practice appears to be influenced by country of practice and base specialty training.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Edema Laríngeo , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Edema Laríngeo/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Cureus ; 12(5): e8179, 2020 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32566420

RESUMO

Methanol toxicity remains a common problem in developing countries including Saudi Arabia. However, it is much less available than other toxins; thus, clinical suspicion and correlation play pivotal roles in diagnosis. On the other hand, paracetamol is widely available and overdose/toxicity is highly suspected especially in young females. Diagnosis of methanol toxicity can be difficult in cases where history is not readily available and it requires a high degree of suspicion, especially when ingestion of another substance is revealed first as should not preclude the possibility of co-ingestion. We report a case of a medically free 26 year old woman who was brought to the Emergency Department (ED) of our hospital with a history of ingestion of a massive amount of paracetamol tablets and a concurrent abdominal pain with vomiting. After arrival, she became unresponsive with Glasgow Coma score (GCS) of 8/15 and was mechanically ventilated. Initial laboratory investigations identify the paracetamol level of 1200 ug/ml and a significantly high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Owing to the suspicious circumstances and the depth of acidosis, a co-ingestion of methanol and ethylene glycol was suspected. Upon further evaluation, osmolal gap was found to be significantly high as well. Since neither volatile compound screening nor Fomepizole were available in our hospital, an urgent N-acetylcysteine and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) were started alongside hemodialysis. Subsequent brain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic reasoning imaging (MRI) revealed changes in putamen and basal ganglia most consistent with methanol toxicity. She was successively extubated on day four of hospitalization with residual visual deficits that had resolved eventually after several follow-ups.

6.
BMJ Open ; 9(7): e029394, 2019 07 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326936

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation are lifesaving interventions that are commonly performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Laryngeal oedema is a known complication of intubation that may cause airway obstruction in a patient on extubation. To date, the only test available to predict this complication is the cuff leak test (CLT); however, its diagnostic accuracy and utility remains uncertain. Herein, we report the protocol for the CuffLeak and AirwayObstruction in MechanicallyVentilated ICU Patients (COMIC) pilottrial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a multicentred, pragmatic, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). We will enrol 100 mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU who are deemed ready for extubation. We will exclude patients at a high risk of laryngeal oedema. All enrolled patients will have a CLT done before extubation. In the intervention arm, the results of the CLT will be communicated to the bedside physician, and decision to extubate will be left to the treating team. In the control arm, respiratory therapist will not communicate the results of the CLT to the treating physician, and the patient will be extubated regardless of the CLT result. Randomisation will be done in a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by size of the endotracheal tube and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation.Although we will examine all clinical outcomes relevant for the future COMIC RCT, the primary outcomes of the COMIC pilottrial will be feasibility outcomes including: consent rate, recruitment rate and protocol adherence. Clinical outcomes include postextubation stridor, reintubation, emergency surgical airway, ICU mortality, in hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay in days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University Institutional Review Board and Bioethical Commission of the Jagiellonian University approved this study. The trial results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03372707.


Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/etiologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico do Sistema Respiratório , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Projetos Piloto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...