Pulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis: a Case Report in King Hussein Medical Center (KHMC), Amman, Jordan.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Alveolar Microlithiasis (PAM) is a rare disorder that can affect patients at any age, although it is more common to present in the third and fourth decades of life. Most patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. However, some may present with symptoms of dyspnea or cough. PAM can be sporadic, or it can be hereditary. AIM: To focus on the importance of using chest CT scans along with bone scintigraphy to aid in the diagnosis of PAM. The importance of screening all family members is also addressed. CASE REPORT: In our case, the patient was a 21-year-old male, coming for routine check-up to be recruited in the army. He was referred to our clinic after the examining doctor noticed that his chest X-Ray was not normal. Upon revising his chest X-ray, he was found to have bilateral fine reticular infiltrates. His physical examination was unremarkable. His spirometry and DLCO were normal. A high-resolution chest CT scan was done, and showed diffuse bilateral microcalcifications with bilateral interstitial and septal thickening. To confirm the diagnosis of PAM, a Technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (Tc-99m MDP) whole body bone scintigraphy was done, and it showed diffusely increased radiotracer uptake in both lungs. His family members were screened for PAM. His father and sister, who were completely asymptomatic and with normal pulmonary function tests, were found to have PAM as well. CONCLUSION: The use of bone scintigraphy plays an integral role in diagnosing patients with radiological findings consistent with PAM, and it can diagnose PAM without the need for invasive procedures. Once diagnosed, screening of all family members for PAM should be done, even when they are asymptomatic, as more than one-third of the cases have a familial pattern.

Nurses' and Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Psychiatric Nursing Care in Jordan.

BACKGROUND: The quality of care provided for patients in mental health-care facilities remains a challenge for health-care providers in general and for nurses in particular. Identifying the level of quality of care provided for patients in mental health-care facilities as perceived by nurses and patients may help health-care providers improve the quality of care and improve patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the perceptions of nurses and patients of the quality of nursing care, and explore the differences in their perceptions of quality of care in mental health-care facilities in Jordan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using two convenience samples of 123 nurses and 150 patients. The nurses completed the Karen-personnel instrument, a self-administered questionnaire; One hundred and fifty patients from several mental health-care facilities in Jordan were interviewed using the Karen-patient instrument. The interviews were structured. RESULTS: Sixtyfour percent of nurses rated the quality of psychiatric nursing care as satisfactory, and 47.6% of patients perceived the quality of nursing care as satisfactory. Male nurses, who attended courses in mental health nursing, chose to work in a psychiatric unit, committed to work in the future in a psychiatric unit, and were providing indirect care have significantly higher perception of quality of psychiatric nursing care than their counterparts. Patients in military hospitals have significantly higher perception of quality of psychiatric nursing care than those in governmental ones (p < .05). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To improve the quality of care in psychiatric units, patients and nurses need to be educated about the quality indicators set by Joint Commission international standards related to mental health-care facilities.