RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) use among adolescents is a major public health concern. This study investigates the prevalence of E-cigarette use among male adolescents in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, and explores associated factors. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to April 2023, involving 476 male students aged 12 to 19. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, covering sociodemographic information, E-cigarette usage patterns, reasons for use, sources of acquisition, awareness of nicotine content, and perceptions of harm. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study revealed a prevalence of 17.4% E-cigarette use among participants, with 12.6% using E-cigarettes exclusively and 4.8% concurrently with traditional tobacco cigarettes. Key findings included initiation as early as age eight, sustained and frequent use, and motivations including peer influence (61.4%), curiosity (31.3%), and flavored options (26.5%). Online platforms (34.9%) and shopping malls (28.9%) were the primary sources of E-cigarette acquisition. Most participants were aware of the nicotine content (84.3%) and believed E-cigarettes were harmful (86.7%). Importantly, 69.9% expressed intentions to quit, with 44.6% planning to do so within 30 days. Significant associations were found between E-cigarette use, education level, and having friends who smoke. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the prevalence of E-cigarette use among male adolescents in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, and identifies peer influence, curiosity, and appealing flavors as driving factors. Targeted prevention and intervention programs, along with regulatory efforts to restrict access, are urgently needed to address this growing public health issue. Increasing awareness of E-cigarette risks and providing cessation support are vital steps towards mitigating E-cigarette use among Saudi male adolescents.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess parental beliefs about the causes, treatment, and necessity for medical assistance for children with nocturnal enuresis (NE). METHOD: A self-administered survey questioned parents' beliefs about NE, including causes and at-home behavioral therapy. We evaluated the association between demographic characteristics and the tendency to seek medical advice for NE. RESULT: The questionnaire received responses from 1232 individuals, 77.1% of whom were female and 82.9% of whom were 30 years of age or older. Psychological issues (53.5%) and laziness to get up (47.6%) were the most often believed causes of NE. Two frequent at-home behavioral therapies chosen by participants were voiding before bedtime and restricting fluid intake at night (73.4% and 70%, respectively). However, only 6.9% of respondents believe that a bedwetting alarm is an effective treatment. The two most frequently reported reasons for not seeking medical attention were parents' belief that their child will eventually outgrow bedwetting (34.1%) and "parents or children's embarrassment" (21.8%). The chi-squared test was used to evaluate the association between demographic characteristics and seeking medical advice. Participants with a single child were more likely than those with more than three children to take their child to the doctor (61.5% vs. 48.6%, respectively). Also, parents who don't have NE-afflicted children were more open to consider seeking medical advice for NE therapy (if their children developed it in the future) compared to parents who already have children with NE. CONCLUSION: Parents in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia hold various misconceptions about the causes and treatment of NE. Only 52.1% of parents would take their child to see a doctor if wetting the bed and only 48.1% of parents were aware of effective treatments for NE. These results emphasize that healthcare practitioners need to provide proper information to raise public awareness of NE.
RESUMO
Background The choice of anesthesia for an elective cesarean section should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment, considering the pregnant woman's preferences, concerns, and the available medical expertise. This study aimed to determine the preferences for general and spinal anesthesia among women undergoing elective cesarean sections and the factors affecting their choice. Methods The study design is a cross-sectional study, and it was conducted on pregnant women to measure the acceptance of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with elective cesarean sections in Saudi Arabia. Random pregnant women were invited to participate in this study across Saudi Arabia after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A digital questionnaire was distributed across Saudi Arabia to be filled out by female residents. A Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA) sheet was used for data entry, while IBM SPSS software version 27.0.1 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results The study included 813 participants; most (28%) of them were 25-30 years old. Of the study participants, 54% had chosen spinal anesthesia before, 22% had chosen general anesthesia, and 24% had chosen neither. Reasons to choose general anesthesia were reported as follows: 21.6% feared pain during surgery, 24.2% feared watching the surgical procedures on their bodies, 16.6% feared back pain, 12.8% feared being paralyzed, and 15.1% feared needles used to administer anesthesia in the lower back. Reasons for choosing spinal anesthesia were reported as follows: 26.3% had back pain concerns; 13% feared prolonged unconsciousness; 9.6% feared having a headache after surgery; 17% had post-surgery pain concerns; 30.1% wanted to be alert at the time of the birth of the baby; 10.6% feared the chances of experiencing nausea and vomiting; and 7.4% feared not being able to breastfeed. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia was chosen by more participants than general anesthesia. There was a statistically significant association between choosing spinal anesthesia and the number of previous pregnancies, parity, history of preterm labor, and recommendation to undergo general or spinal anesthesia by non-medical staff. It was also significant with the older age and higher educational level of participants. This decision may be influenced by a number of variables, the most significant of which are prior experience with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, educational attainment, and non-medical advice.
RESUMO
Sexual function is a vital component of overall well-being and quality of life. Physical activity is known to have a profound influence on various aspects of health, but its impact on sexual function in the general population remains an under-explored area. This systematic review seeks to thoroughly examine existing evidence, aiming to establish the correlation between physical activity and sexual function in both male and female adults. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases and relevant sources, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies were those that investigated the effects of physical activity on sexual function using the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) questionnaire and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Quality assessment was performed on the included studies, and the findings were synthesized through qualitative analysis. The review identified 12 randomized controlled trials, primarily focusing on males, with interventions ranging from home-based walking to structured exercise training. Only two studies were conducted among females. The most recommended exercise was aerobic exercise. Consistent aerobic exercise proves to be a hopeful and efficient non-drug intervention for enhancing erectile function in men. However, when considering the effects of physical exercise programs on sexual function and the quality of sexual life of females, the results present challenges in drawing clear conclusions. Health policymakers play an important role in providing guidelines and recommendations to healthcare professionals, encouraging them to prescribe exercise as a preferable alternative to pharmacological treatments for enhancing sexual functions in both men and women.
