RESUMO
Ketorolac tromethamine (KT), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was formulated in buccoadhesive film to overcome the limitations in the currently available routes of administration which in sequence will increase patients' compliance. The film was formulated using aqueous solvents by means of two bioadhesive polymers namely: hydroxylpropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) and Carbopol 934. The prepared film was subjected to investigations for its physical and mechanical properties, swelling behavior, in vitro bioadhesion, and in vitro, in situ and in vivo release. Anti-inflammatory efficacy and analgesic activity of the prepared buccoadhesive film were investigated in rats using the hind-paw oedema test and the hot plate method. The analgesic efficacy and tolerability of a single 30 mg dose of KT formulated into the buccoadhesive film was clinically evaluated using a standard, widely accepted post-oral surgery pain model. In this study, the prepared film has been administrated to dental post-operative patients for relieving pain in dental hospital clinic. Results indicate that the concentration of KT in the oral cavity was maintained above 4.0 microg/ml for a period of at least 6 h. The buccal KT film was excellently tolerated in all patients and no complains of GI side effects were reported. It is concluded from this clinical evaluation that KT formulated into a buccoadhesive film is effective as a potent analgesic in dental and postoperative oral surgery in a single dose of 30 mg with minimal GI side effects.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Cetorolaco/administração & dosagem , Cetorolaco/uso terapêutico , Mucosa Bucal , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacologia , Área Sob a Curva , Fenômenos Químicos , Físico-Química , Difusão , Método Duplo-Cego , Edema/induzido quimicamente , Edema/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Cetorolaco/farmacologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Polímeros , Ratos , Tempo de Reação/efeitos dos fármacos , Adesivos Teciduais , Extração Dentária/efeitos adversosRESUMO
This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Cefixima/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Área Sob a Curva , Disponibilidade Biológica , Cefixima/administração & dosagem , Cefixima/sangue , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Humanos , Masculino , Suspensões , Equivalência TerapêuticaRESUMO
This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.