Internship Preparatory Clinical Course: A Timed-Station Approach to Bridging the Theory-to-Practice Gap.

BACKGROUND: Medical students' transition to internship has a discernible gap in structured preparation, particularly in practical skill application. We introduced the internship preparatory clinical course (IPCC) to address this gap.  Methods: The course was conducted at the clinical skills and simulation center at King Saud University Medical City and included a total of eight skills distributed across four stations. It employs a timed-station methodology, inspired by the Observed Structured Clinical Examination, but innovatively adapted as a teaching method. Participants were exposed to various stations, such as suturing techniques, interactive mannequins for anatomical structure demonstration, real ultrasound machines on simulated patients, IV cannulation, and urinary catheterization. To facilitate active learning, participants received course materials a day prior, equipped with QR codes for quick reference. Instructors emphasized on-the-spot review, fostering an environment where learners actively engage. Toward the end of the course, after internship a follow-up survey was administered to obtain feedback, achieving a response rate of 83% (n=45/54). RESULTS: Feedback from the course was overwhelmingly positive, with 91.1% (n=41/45) rating the course as 7 and above out of 10. Participants expressed a higher degree of confidence in providing wound care (Median: 8, IQR: 2) and inserting or removing a Foley catheter (Median: 8, IQR: 4). Lower confidence was observed in stoma examination and care (Median: 5, IQR: 4). During their internships, participants reported that 100% (n=45/45) utilized suturing skills, 48.9% (n=22/45) performed focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examinations, and 62.2% (n=28/45) attempted nasogastric tube insertions. Additionally, 88.9% (n=40/45) performed wound examinations, 77.8% (n=35/45) provided wound care and dressing, 37.8% (n=17/45) performed abscess drainage, 51.1% (n=23/45) removed and 37.8% (n=17/45) inserted a Foley catheter, and 20% (n=9/45) provided stoma care. CONCLUSION: The IPCC effectively addresses the existing gap in medical education, bridging the theory-to-practice divide. The innovative use of the timed-station approach emphasizes the importance of active learning. Our results signify the importance of simulation training, as most interns acknowledge the positive impact of the course on their internship. We recommend preparing pre-interns for internships by giving special consideration to the procedural aspects as most associated with medical errors. The timed-station approach can improve cost-effectiveness and enhance responsibility-driven learning.

In Silico Evaluation of Coding and Non-Coding nsSNPs in the Thrombopoietin Receptor (MPL) Proto-Oncogene: Assessing Their Influence on Protein Stability, Structure, and Function.

The thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) gene is a critical regulator of hematopoiesis, and any alterations in its structure or function can result in a range of hematological disorders. Non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in MPL have the potential to disrupt normal protein function, prompting our investigation into the most deleterious MPL SNPs and the associated structural changes affecting protein-protein interactions. We employed a comprehensive suite of bioinformatics tools, including PredictSNP, InterPro, ConSurf, I-Mutant2.0, MUpro, Musitedeep, Project HOPE, STRING, RegulomeDB, Mutpred2, CScape, and CScape Somatic, to analyze 635 nsSNPs within the MPL gene. Among the analyzed nsSNPs, PredictSNP identified 28 as significantly pathogenic, revealing three critical functional domains within MPL. Ten of these nsSNPs exhibited high conservation scores, indicating potential effects on protein structure and function, while 14 were found to compromise MPL protein stability. Although the most harmful nsSNPs did not directly impact post-translational modification sites, 13 had the capacity to substantially alter the protein's physicochemical properties. Some mutations posed a risk to vital protein-protein interactions crucial for hematological functions, and three non-coding region nsSNPs displayed significant regulatory potential with potential implications for hematopoiesis. Furthermore, 13 out of 21 nsSNPs evaluated were classified as high-risk pathogenic variants by Mutpred2. Notably, amino acid alterations such as C291S, T293N, D295G, and W435C, while impactful on protein stability and function, were deemed non-oncogenic "passenger" mutations. Our study underscores the substantial impact of missense nsSNPs on MPL protein structure and function. Given MPL's central role in hematopoiesis, these mutations can significantly disrupt hematological processes, potentially leading to a variety of disorders. The identified high-risk pathogenic nsSNPs may hold promise as potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets for hematological diseases. This research lays the foundation for future investigations into the MPL gene's role in the realm of hematological health and diseases.

Penetrating Neck Injury: Double Jeopardy of a Complex Aerodigestive Dilemma.

The neck is a critical region containing many essential structures. Before surgical intervention, it is crucial to assess the adequacy of the airway and circulation, as well as the presence of any skeletal or neurological damage. Here, we present a case of a 33-year-old male with a background of amphetamine abuse who presented to our emergency department with a penetrating neck injury just below the mandible at the hypopharynx level, resulting in an upper zone II neck injury with complete separation of the airway. The patient was taken immediately to the operating room for exploration. Airways were managed by direct intubation, hemostasis was maintained, and the open laryngeal injury was repaired. After the surgery, this patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for two days and discharged after a satisfactory full recovery. Penetrating neck injuries are rare but often fatal. Advanced trauma life support guidelines emphasize the importance of managing the airway as the first action. Providing multidisciplinary care before, during, and after trauma can help prevent and treat such incidents.

Saudi Critical Care Society clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adults with trauma: reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

BACKGROUND: To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in adults with trauma in inpatient settings. METHODS: The Saudi Critical Care Society (SCCS) sponsored guidelines development and included 22 multidisciplinary panel members who completed conflict-of-interest forms. The panel developed and answered structured guidelines questions. For each question, the literature was searched for relevant studies. To summarize treatment effects, meta-analyses were conducted or updated. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then the evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework was used to generate recommendations. Recommendations covered the following prioritized domains: timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation in non-operative blunt solid organ injuries; isolated blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI); isolated blunt spine trauma or fracture and/or spinal cord injury (SCI); type and dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis; mechanical VTE prophylaxis; routine duplex ultrasonography (US) surveillance; and inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs). RESULTS: The panel issued 12 clinical practice recommendations-one, a strong recommendation, 10 weak, and one with no recommendation due to insufficient evidence. The panel suggests starting early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for non-operative blunt solid organ injuries, isolated blunt TBIs, and SCIs. The panel suggests using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) and suggests either intermediate-high dose LMWH or conventional dosing LMWH. For adults with trauma who are not pharmacologic candidates, the panel strongly recommends using mechanical VTE prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). The panel suggests using either combined VTE prophylaxis with mechanical and pharmacologic methods or pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis alone. Additionally, the panel suggests routine bilateral lower extremity US in adults with trauma with elevated risk of VTE who are ineligible for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and suggests against the routine placement of prophylactic IVCFs. Because of insufficient evidence, the panel did not issue any recommendation on the use of early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in adults with isolated blunt TBI requiring neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The SCCS guidelines for VTE prevention in adults with trauma were based on the best available evidence and identified areas for further research. The framework may facilitate adaptation of recommendations by national/international guideline policymakers.

Saudi Critical Care Society clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adults with trauma: reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in adults with trauma in inpatient settings. The Saudi Critical Care Society (SCCS) sponsored guidelines development and included 22 multidisciplinary panel members who completed conflict-of-interest forms. The panel developed and answered structured guidelines questions. For each question, the literature was searched for relevant studies. To summarize treatment effects, meta-analyses were conducted or updated. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then the evidence-to-decision (EtD) framework was used to generate recommendations. Recommendations covered the following prioritized domains: timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation in non-operative blunt solid organ injuries; isolated blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI); isolated blunt spine trauma or fracture and/or spinal cord injury (SCI); type and dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis; mechanical VTE prophylaxis; routine duplex ultrasonography (US) surveillance; and inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs). The panel issued 12 clinical practice recommendations­one, a strong recommendation, 10 weak, and one with no recommendation due to insufficient evidence. The panel suggests starting early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for non-operative blunt solid organ injuries, isolated blunt TBIs, and SCIs. The panel suggests using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) and suggests either intermediate­high dose LMWH or conventional dosing LMWH. For adults with trauma who are not pharmacologic candidates, the panel strongly recommends using mechanical VTE prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). The panel suggests using either combined VTE prophylaxis with mechanical and pharmacologic methods or pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis alone. Additionally, the panel suggests routine bilateral lower extremity US in adults with trauma with elevated risk of VTE who are ineligible for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and suggests against the routine placement of prophylactic IVCFs. Because of insufficient evidence, the panel did not issue any recommendation on the use of early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in adults with isolated blunt TBI requiring neurosurgical intervention. The SCCS guidelines for VTE prevention in adults with trauma were based on the best available evidence and identified areas for further research. The framework may facilitate adaptation of recommendations by national/international guideline policymakers.

Selenium and COVID-19: A spotlight on the clinical trials, inventive compositions, and patent literature.

Selenium is an indispensable trace element for all living organisms. It is an essential structural component of several selenium-dependent enzymes, which support the human body's defense mechanism. Recently, the significance of selenium in preventing/treating COVID-19 has been documented in the literature. This review highlights the clinical studies, compositions, and patent literature on selenium to prevent/treat COVID-19. Selenium exerts its anti-COVID-19 action by reducing oxidative stress, declining the expression of the ACE-2 receptor, lowering the discharge of pro-inflammatory substances, and inhibiting the 3CLPro (main protease) and PLpro enzyme of SARS-CoV-2. The data of clinical studies, inventive compositions, and patent literature revealed that selenium monotherapy and its compositions with other nutritional supplements/drugs (vitamin, iron, zinc, copper, ferulic acid, resveratrol, spirulina, N-acetylcysteine, fish oil, many herbs, doxycycline, azithromycin, curcumin, quercetin, etc.,) might be practical to prevent/treat COVID-19. The studies have also suggested a correlation between COVID-19 and selenium deficiency. This indicates that adequate selenium supplementation may provide promising treatment outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The authors foresee the development and commercialization of Selenium-based compositions and dosage forms (spray, inhalers, control release dosage forms, etc.) to battle COVID-19. We also trust that numerous selenium-based compositions are yet to be explored. Accordingly, there is good scope for scientists to work on developing novel and inventive selenium-based compositions to fight against COVID-19. However, there is also a need to consider the narrow therapeutic window and chemical interaction of selenium before developing selenium-based compositions.

The Role of Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Multicenter, Cohort Study.

Background: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can boost the systematic inflammatory response in critically ill patients, causing a systemic hyperinflammatory state leading to multiple complications. In COVID-19 patients, the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is surrounded by controversy regarding their impacts on viral infections. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICS in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and its clinical outcomes. Method: A multicenter, noninterventional, cohort study for critically ill patients with COVID-19 who received ICS. All patients aged ≥ 18 years old with confirmed COVID-19 and admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) between March 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 were screened. Eligible patients were classified into two groups based on the use of ICS ± long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) during ICU stay. Propensity score (PS)-matched was used based on patient's Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, systemic corticosteroids use, and acute kidney injury (AKI) within 24 h of ICU admission. We considered a P-value of < 0.05 statistically significant. Results: A total of 954 patients were eligible; 130 patients were included after PS matching (1:1 ratio). The 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]: 0.53 [0.31, 0.93], P-value = 0.03) was statistically significant lower in patients who received ICS. Conversely, the in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days (VFDs), ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of ICS ± LABA in COVID-19 patients may have survival benefits at 30 days. However, it was not associated with in-hospital mortality benefits nor VFDs.

The use of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis or treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis and review of the guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is one of the most common causes of increased morbidity and mortality. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) has been evaluated in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess efficacy and safety of using DOACs for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of CA-VTE and provide a summary for available guidelines' recommendations. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched to identify studies evaluating the use of DOACs for thromboprophylaxis or treatment in patients with cancer. Search was limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English. Studies were excluded if they were not RCTs or subgroup analyses of data derived from RCTs, if they did not report efficacy and safety data on patients with active cancer, or if they were published as an abstract. New VTE or VTE recurrence, and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were used to assess the efficacy and safety, respectively. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model risk ratios (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the pooled treatment effects of DOACs. RESULTS: Four studies evaluating DOACs use for thromboprophylaxis and four - for treatment of CA-VTE were included. Thromboprophylaxis with DOACs was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of symptomatic VTE (RR = 0.58; 95%CI 0.37,0.91) but with an incremental risk of major bleeding or CRNMB (RR = 1.57; 95%CI 1.10,2.26). CA-VTE treatment with DOACs was linked with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence (RR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.44,0.87) but with an incremental risk of CRNMB (RR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.11,2.24). CONCLUSIONS: The DOACs are associated with a lower risk of symptomatic VTE and VTE recurrence, but the risk of bleeding remains a considerable concern. Clinical decisions should be made by assessing individual patient's risk of VTE and bleeding.

Safety and effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis use in hospitalized elderly medical patients at a Saudi tertiary care center.

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines' recommendations can heighten over- or underutilization risk. The study intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of appropriate/inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use among hospitalized elderly medical patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including patients who were ≥60 years old, hospitalized for an acute medical illness that required hospitalization in a medical ward for >48 h, and received thromboprophylaxis. Against the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, the thromboprophylaxis use appropriateness was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, in 71.9% of whom thromboprophylaxis use was appropriate. The mean age of the included patients was 75 years (±9.1), and 72.4% of them were at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and almost all these patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis. The occurrence of bleeding was significantly higher in the appropriate use group during hospitalization than the inappropriate use group (11.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.009); the majority of these bleeding events were classified as major. There were no differences in VTE events during hospitalization or 90 days all-cause mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates high prescribers' compliance with recommendations in high-risk patients. In patients at low risk for VTE, the overutilization of thromboprophylaxis did not increase their bleeding risk. This study suggests that the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients, regardless of their VTE risk, may outweigh the risk of bleeding.

Benefits of conservative management of a retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is a disease with multifactorial etiology and frequently includes lumen obstruction. Appendicoliths can pose a challenge during the appendectomy procedure if not identified. METHODS: This is a prospective case series at our academic institution involving two medically free patients with intra-abdominal abscess formation secondary to an overlooked appendicolith who were treated conservatively with a follow up period of one year for each patient. RESULTS: Complications of a retained appendicolith are serious and include intra-abdominal abscess, perihepatic abscess, and delayed wound healing through fistula formation, most surgeons would undergo surgical removal with preoperative localization of the appendicolith using different modalities. In contrast, conservative management is an emerging approach to managing such conditions. The conservative approach involves percutaneous retrieval and the IR-guided draining of an intra-abdominal collection. In our cases, percutaneous drainage and intravenous antibiotics were a successful treatment, with no abscess recurrence in over a year. CONCLUSION: We suggest that patients with appendicoliths presenting with appendicitis should undergo appendicolith removal to prevent the risk of recurrent abscess formation. We also consider that the conservative management of patients with appendicoliths presenting with recurrent abdominal pain and abscesses after appendectomy is a better and safer approach than the surgical removal of a dropped appendicolith, as the risks of the surgical procedure complications can be avoided.

Vacuum-Assisted Closure in a Patient With Entero-Atmospheric Fistula: A Case Report.

The entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF) is a recognized complication of open abdomen surgeries, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. This usually causes long hospitalizations and may require many surgical operations. While different methods of treatment for EAF are used, all different methods share the same goal, which is a proper closure of the fistula and the open abdomen to avoid recurrence and complications. We report a case of a 48-year-old female with a bowel perforation following an attempted open bilateral ovarian cyst drainage with cyst wall biopsy complicated by entero-atmospheric fistula treated by wound closure with vacuum-assisted pressure. In conclusion, the use of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) to induce spontaneous healing of EAFs can provide a safe acceptable alternative to surgical treatment.

Non operative management of proximal posterior gastric injury in a trauma patient: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal postierior gastric injuries are challenging and are often overlooked and diagnosed late. We present a case of traumatic proximal posterior gastric injury. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 34-year-old male patient presented with traumatic proximal posterior gastric injury secondary to falling from a height. Nonoperative treatment was achieved by placing a gastric stent and wide drainage that resulted in complete healing of the perforation within a period of 8 weeks. DISCUSSION: There are no standard treatment guidelines for managing gastric leaks, except for surgical repair, in trauma patients. Management with a gastric stent has been proven effective in gastric leaks resulting from bariatric surgeries and surgical interventions for gastric cancer. This approach was followed in the management of our patient and showed promising results. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management with an endoscopic stent can be considered a treatment option for leaks resulting from traumatic gastric injury.

Postoperative complications in living liver donors: A retrospective study, single-center experience in Saudi Arabia.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers life to patients with end-stage liver disease. The balance between the benefit to the recipient and the risk to the donor plays a central role in justifying LDLT. However, the incidence rates of complications posttransplant differ widely. This study is designed to identify postoperative complications in LDLT in a tertiary care center King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). This was a retrospective cohort study. All donors at KAMC between January 2003 and December 2015 were reviewed through a hospital database and patient charts to determine the postoperative complications based on the modified Clavien classification system. All donors were relatives of the recipients and assessed before the surgery. A total of 101 donors underwent LDLT: 75 were male and 26 were female, with a mean age of 27.7 ± 6.6. The breakdown of specific surgical procedures was as follows: 65 (64.3%) donors underwent right hepatic lobectomy, 31 (30.6%) underwent left lateral hepatectomy, three (2.97%) underwent extended right hepatectomy with the inclusion of the middle hepatic vein, and two (1.98%) underwent left hepatectomy. Postoperative complications were determined in 20 patients (19.8%), but no mortality was observed. Complications were reported in 14 (21.5%) right and six (19.4%) left lateral hepatectomy donors. A total of 12 patients had Grade I complications, six patients had Grade II complications, and Grade III complications were reported in two cases. The most frequent complications were upper limb weakness to brachial plexus neuropathy and mild bile leak. Life-threatening complications in our center have not been reported in LDLT; however, some donors may experience postoperative morbidity, which usually were mild and had a good prognosis.

Prevalence of Sexual Abuse Among Secondary School Students in Saudi Arabia.

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a public health problem that has been found to be linked to negative health outcomes. Data on CSA in Saudi Arabia are limited, and there are many gaps in research in this field. The aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of sexual abuse among children in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional, national survey (N = 16,010) utilizing International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool Children's Version was conducted at secondary high schools in Saudi Arabia. Participant's mean age was 16.8 ± 0.9 years, and 50.8% were boys. Sixteen percent of the participants reported exposure to any type of CSA during their lives. Boys and those who lived with step-parent were more likely to be sexually abused compared to those who didn't (p < .05). Ordinary least squares regression analysis revealed that gender was the predictor significantly associated with CSA. Evidence-based prevention programs targeting mainly the high-risk groups should be implemented.