Opioid and benzodiazepine requirements in critically ill post-surgical children with down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS), or Trisomy 21, is defined by the existence of an additional chromosome 21. Various physiological considerations in DS patients might lead to challenges in adequate pain management and sedation after surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the variations of the requirement needed for pain management and sedation in patients with DS who have undergone surgery compared to patients without DS. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were conducted, focusing on critically ill patients with DS who were admitted to Intensive care units (ICUs) post-surgery and received opioids and/or benzodiazepines. Searches were conducted in four databases from their inception to November 18, 2023 (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). The primary outcome measured was the dosage of Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME) administered in the days following surgery. Fixed-effect models were used, an approach advisable when only a limited number of studies are available. RESULTS: Out of the 992 studies initially screened, the systematic review included ten studies, encompassing 730 patients, while the meta-analysis consisted of seven studies, encompassing 533 patients. Of the seven studies included in the analysis, 298 patients were identified to have DS, and 235 patients served as controls. Patients with DS showed a slight increase in OME needs on the first day, but this increase was not statistically significant (mean difference [MD] = 0.09; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [-0.02, 0.20]; P = 0.11). There was also no significant difference in the requirement for Midazolam on the first day among DS patients (MD = 0.01; CI [-0.16, 0.19]; P = 0.88). In addition, the duration of mechanical ventilation was not statistically significant in patients with DS compared with the control group (MD = -1.46 hours; 95% CI [-9.74, 6.82]; P = 0.73). CONCLUSION: Patients with Down syndrome did not require more sedation or analgesia in the first three days after surgery than patients without Down syndrome. Additionally, the two groups showed no significant difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Efficacy and Safety of Bictegravir-Based Regimen in Pregnant Women Living with HIV: A Case Report.

Bictegravir (BIC) is included in international guidelines as the first line of therapy for patients living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), either as initial therapy or as a replacement for patients with prior antiretroviral therapy (ART). Due to limited efficacy and safety data, BIC is currently not recommended during pregnancy. Data on the safety and efficacy of BIC during pregnancy were unavailable at the time of drug approval. In our case, BIC/TAF/FTC was effective in suppressing viral load (VL) in pregnancy, and there were no reported safety issues for the mother or the baby.

Frequency of serum blood glucose monitoring after hyperkalaemia treatment using insulin and dextrose.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with hyperkalaemia, dextrose is administered alongside insulin treatment to prevent hypoglycaemia. However, the incidence of hypoglycaemia in the first 6 hours following this regimen remains high, and frequent blood glucose monitoring is essential. This study evaluates the frequency of blood glucose monitoring following this insulin regimen. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre study evaluated adult patients (≥18 years) who had been hospitalised for hyperkalaemia (K ≥ 5 mEq/mL) and managed using intravenous insulin and dextrose. We excluded patients if dextrose was not administered within 60 minutes of insulin therapy. The primary outcome was the frequency of serum blood glucose monitoring within 6 hours of the regimen. Secondary outcomes were the time between insulin treatment and follow-up measurements, and the incidence of hypoglycaemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL). RESULTS: In total, 521 hyperkalaemia episodes were available for analysis; 192 (36.9%) had at least one reported follow-up measurement, 30 had at least two follow-up measurements (5.8%), and six had at least three follow-up measurements (1.2%). The median times of obtaining the first, second, and third blood glucose measurements were 3 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.7-4 h), 3.9 h (IQR: 3.2-5.1 h), and 4 h (IQR: 3.2-5.1 h), respectively. The incidence of hypoglycaemia among the episodes with follow-up was 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of serum blood glucose monitoring following insulin therapy was low and inconsistent. This study emphasised the importance of adopting protocols incorporating more frequent blood glucose monitoring.

Description and Analysis of Cytokine Storm in Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

The purpose of this systematic review was to describe the characteristics of clinical trials that focused on COVID-19 patients with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the variability in CRS definitions. Two authors independently searched three clinical trial registries and included interventional clinical trials on COVID-19 hospitalized patients that required at least one elevated inflammatory biomarker. Relevant data, including the type and cutoff of the measured biomarker, oxygen/respiratory criteria, fever, radiologic criteria, and medications, were summarized. A total of 47 clinical trials were included. The included studies considered the following criteria: oxygen/respiratory criteria in 42 trials (89%), radiologic criteria in 29 trials (62%), and fever in 6 trials (18%). Serum ferritin was measured in 35 trials (74%), CRP in 34 trials (72%), D-dimer in 26 trials (55%), LDH in 24 trials (51%), lymphocyte count in 14 trials (30%), and IL-6 in 8 trials (17%). The cutoff values were variable for the included biomarkers. The most commonly used medications were tocilizumab, in 15 trials (32%), and anakinra in 10 trials (24.4%). This systematic review found high variability in CRS definitions and associated biomarker cutoff values in COVID-19 clinical trials. We call for a standardized definition of CRS, especially in COVID-19 patients.