RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to provide an overview of perceptions of quality improvement among nurses working in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study of 497 Saudi nurses working in public and private hospitals in Al-Qassim Province. Descriptive statistics were computed for quality improvement nursing attitude items and demographic factors. RESULTS: A total of 497 nurses took part in the study; 29.1% of participants were females, and half of the participants were between the ages of 25-30 years. Most respondents were employed in governmental hospitals (98.7%), and 41.9% of participants had work experience ranging between 1 and 5 years. Nurses involved in providing direct patient care recognize the quality improvement attitudes related to changes in the healthcare delivery processes. Saudi nurses' quality improvement nursing attitudes were moderate. Female, married, and older age group nurses and nurses who were working fewer hours per week showed better quality improvement attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Saudi nurses' quality improvement nursing attitudes are found to be moderate. Age, gender, marital status, and working hours of nurses are associated with their quality improvement attitudes. To empower nurses to improve healthcare, nursing administrators need to focus on improving the quality improvement attitudes environment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Saudi Arabia, cultural and language differences between expatriate nurses and patients affect the quality of nursing care. Hence, the Kingdom is eying Saudization in this field. The productivity of nurses can affect the productivity of the whole health system. The aim of this study was to investigate the health-care productivity of Saudi female nurses and socio-demographic determinants of their productivity. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 256 randomly selected Saudi female nurses in the Qassim region. The nurses who were not working in public hospitals; not giving direct patient care or had <1-year patient-care experience were excluded from the study. The nurses' work productivity was measured using a 17-item index. RESULTS: The mean age of the nurses was 30.2 ± 5.6 years. Among the nurses, 62.6% were currently married, 33% were never married, and 4.4% were divorced/widowed. Most of the nurses were not willing to serve male patients (70.3%); they wanted to work only in female units (66.1%) and did not prefer night shifts (50.8%). Over the past 1 year, most of them demonstrated tendency of taking emergency leave (64.2%) and sick leave (56.4%), while 27.3% had unexcused absences and 19.5% had unplanned but excused absences. In addition, 20.3% demonstrated a tendency of taking frequent breaks during duty hours and 18.9% demonstrated tendency of being late on duty. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that being married was associated with 1.66 points decrease in the productivity index score when compared to never married nurses. Having one more child under 5 years of age was associated with 0.75 points increase in the productivity index score. In addition, nurses who employed household workers at home scored 1.04 points less than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare productivity index score was lower among married Saudi female nurses than never married nurses. However, aspects of married life commonly believed to cause home work-life conflicts, such as number of children, living with or without family, having disabled children in household and personal factors such as age did not have statistically significant influence on the productivity index score. It is possible that unexplained cultural issues associated with being married may be responsible for a lower productivity index score among married female nurses in Saudi Arabia.