Efficacy and safety of Butantan-DV in participants aged 2-59 years through an extended follow-up: results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: A single-dose dengue vaccine that protects individuals across a wide age range and regardless of dengue serostatus is an unmet need. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the live, attenuated, tetravalent Butantan-dengue vaccine (Butantan-DV) in adults, adolescents, and children. We previously reported the primary and secondary efficacy and safety endpoints in the initial 2 years of follow-up. Here we report the results through an extended follow-up period, with an average of 3·7 years of follow-up. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, multicentre trial in Brazil, healthy participants (aged 2-59 years) who had not previously received a dengue vaccine were enrolled and randomly assigned 2:1 (stratified by age 18-59 years, 7-17 years, and 2-6 years) using a central electronic randomisation system to receive 0·5 mL of Butantan-DV (containing approximately 103 plaque-forming units of each of the four vaccine virus strains) or placebo, administered subcutaneously. Syringes containing vaccine or placebo were prepared by an unmasked trial pharmacist who was not involved in any subsequent participant assessments; other site staff and the participants remained unaware of the group allocations. Vaccine efficacy was calculated with the accrual of virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) cases (by RT-PCR) at least 28 days after vaccination up until the cutoff (at least 2 years of follow-up from the last participant enrolled). The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against VCD after day 28 by any dengue virus (DENV) serotype regardless of dengue serostatus at baseline in the per-protocol population. The primary and secondary safety endpoints up until day 21 were previously reported; secondary safety endpoints include the frequency of unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events after day 22. Safety analyses were done on all participants as treated. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02406729) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Of 16 363 participants assessed for eligibility, 16 235 were randomly assigned between Feb 22, 2016, and July 5, 2019, and received single-dose Butantan-DV (10 259 participants) or placebo (5976 participants). 16 162 participants (Butantan-DV n=10 215; placebo n=5947) were included in the per-protocol population and 16 235 (Butantan-DV n=10 259; placebo n=5976) in the safety population. At the data cutoff (July 13, 2021), participants had 2-5 years of follow-up (mean 3·7 years [SD 1·0], median 4·0 years [IQR 3·2-4·5]). 356 VCD cases were captured through the follow-up (128 in the vaccine group and 228 in the placebo group). Vaccine efficacy against VCD caused by any DENV serotype was 67·3% (95% CI 59·4-73·9); cases caused by DENV-3 or DENV-4 were not observed. The proportions of participants who had serious adverse events were similar between treatment groups (637 [6·2%] in the vaccine group and 395 [6·6%] in the placebo group) up until the cutoff. INTERPRETATION: A single dose of Butantan-DV was generally well tolerated and efficacious against symptomatic VCD (caused by DENV-1 and DENV-2) for a mean of 3·7 years. These findings support the continued development of Butantan-DV to prevent dengue disease in children, adolescents, and adults regardless of dengue serostatus. FUNDING: Instituto Butantan and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co. TRANSLATIONS: For the Spanish and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Predictors of Survival, Treatment Modalities, and Clinical Outcomes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Patients Older Than 70 Years Still an Unmet Medical Need in 2024 Based on Real-World Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) especially affects the older population. Old (≥60 years) and very old age (≥80 years) DLBCL patients often present high-risk molecular alterations, lower tolerability to conventional immunochemotherapy, and poor clinical outcomes. In this scenario, attenuated therapeutic strategies, such as the R-MiniCHOP and R-MiniCHOP of the elderly regimens, have emerged for this particularly fragile population. However, the responses, clinical outcomes, and toxicities of these regimens currently remain poorly understood, mainly because these individuals are not usually included in controlled clinical trials. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, and single-center real-world study included 185 DLBCL, NOS patients older than 70 years treated at the largest oncology center in Latin America from 2009 to 2020. We aimed to assess the outcomes, determine survival predictors, and compare responses and toxicities between three different primary therapeutic strategies, including the conventional R-CHOP regimen and the attenuated R-MiniCHOP and R-MiniCHOP of the elderly protocols. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 75 years (70-97 years), and 58.9% were female. Comorbidities were prevalent, including 19.5% with immobility, 28.1% with malnutrition, and 24.8% with polypharmacy. Advanced clinical stage was observed in 72.4%, 48.6% had bulky disease ≥7 cm, 63.2% had B-symptoms, and 67.0% presented intermediate-high/high-risk IPI. With a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the estimated 5-year OS and PFS were 50.2% and 44.6%, respectively. The R-MiniCHOP of the elderly regimen had a lower ORR (p = 0.040); however, patients in this group had higher rates of unfavorable clinical and laboratory findings, including hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.001), IPI ≥ 3 (p = 0.013), and NCCN-IPI ≥ 3 (p = 0.002). Although associated with higher rates of severe neutropenia (p = 0.003), the R-CHOP regimen promoted increased OS (p = 0.003) and PFS (p = 0.005) in comparison to the attenuated protocols. Additionally, age ≥ 75 years, high levels of LDH, B-symptoms, advanced clinical stage (III/IV), neutrophilia, and low lymphocyte/monocyte ratio were identified as poor prognostic factors in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this large and real-life Latin American cohort, we demonstrated that patients with DLBCL, NOS older than 70 years still do not have satisfactory clinical outcomes in 2024, with half of cases not reaching 5 years of life expectancy after diagnosis. Although the conventional R-CHOP offers response and survival advantages over attenuated regimens, its myelotoxicity is not negligible. Therefore, the outcomes reported and the prognostic factors here identified may assist clinicians in the appropriate selection of therapeutic strategies adapted to the risk for old and very old DLBCL patients.

Impact of genetic background as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A protocol for a nationwide genetic case-control (CV-GENES) study in Brazil.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) represents the leading cause of death worldwide, and individual screening should be based on behavioral, metabolic, and genetic profile derived from data collected in large population-based studies. Due to the polygenic nature of ASCVD, we aimed to assess the association of genomics with ASCVD risk and its impact on the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery thrombotic-ischemic events at population level. CardioVascular Genes (CV-GENES) is a nationwide, multicenter, 1:1 case-control study of 3,734 patients in Brazil. Inclusion criterion for cases is the first occurrence of one of the ASCVD events. Individuals without known ASCVD will be eligible as controls. A core lab will perform the genetic analyses through low-pass whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing. In order to estimate the independent association between genetic polymorphisms and ASCVD, a polygenic risk score (PRS) will be built through a hybrid approach including effect size of each Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP), number of effect alleles observed, sample ploidy, total number of SNPs included in the PRS, and number of non-missing SNPs in the sample. In addition, the presence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants will be screened in 8 genes (ABCG5, ABCG8, APOB, APOE, LDLR, LDLRAP1, LIPA, PCSK9) associated with atherosclerosis. Multiple logistic regression will be applied to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and population attributable risks will be calculated. Clinical trial registration: This study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05515653).

Impact of baseline and interim quantitative PET parameters on outcomes of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Currently, analysis of interim PET (iPET) according to the Deauville score (DS) is the most important predictive factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL); however, there is room for improvement in its prognostic power. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative PET analysis (maximum standard uptake value [SUVmax], total metabolic tumor volume [TMTV] and total lesion glicolysis [TLG]) at baseline (PET0) and iPET in a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed classical HL. For positive iPET (+ iPET), the reduction of quantitative parameters in relation to PET0 (ΔSUVmax, ΔTMTV and ΔTLG) was calculated. Between 2011 and 2017, 234 patients treated with ABVD were analyzed. Median age was 30 years-old, 59% had advanced stage disease, 57% a bulky mass and 25% a + iPET (DS 4-5). At baseline, high TLG was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of failure (CIF) (p = 0.032) while neither SUVmax, TMTV or TLG were associated with overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, only iPET was associated with CIF (p < 0.001). Among ΔSUVmax, ΔTMTV and ΔTLG, only a ΔSUVmax ≥ 68.8 was significant for PFS (HR: 0.31, CI95%: 0.11-0.86, p = 0.024). A subset of patients with improved PFS amongst + iPET was identified by the quantitative (ΔSUVmax ≥ 68.8%) analysis. In this real-world Brazilian cohort, with prevalent high-risk patients, quantitative analysis of PET0 did not demonstrate to be prognostic, while a dynamic approach incorporating the ΔSUVmax to + iPET succeeded in refining a subset with better prognosis. These findings warrant validation in larger series and indicate that not all patients with + iPET might need treatment intensification.

External quality control program in infectious diseases screening at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America: an analysis of the past 5 years.

Objective: To evaluate the screening of blood samples for infectious disease markers at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America per the findings of an External Quality Assessment Program (EQAP). Methods: This qualitative analysis used data from the EQAP coordinated by the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo with the support of the Pan American Health Organization to assess the performance of blood screening for infectious diseases from 2014 to 2018 in Latin America. Each participating laboratory or blood bank received an identical blind panel with 24 blood samples with variable reactivity for all the screening parameters. Panels were processed at each participating facility and results were returned to the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo for individual and joint analyses. Two types of discrepant results were potential failures: false positive results (FPRs) and false nonreactive results (FNRRs). Results: A total of 23 136 samples were evaluated. Global rates of FPR, FNRR, and concordant results were 0.3%, 1.0% and 98.7%, respectively. Seven FNRRs were found for HBsAg (1.0%), 12 for syphilis (2.6%), and 21 for Chagas disease (2.9%). No FNRRs were found for the HIV, HCV, and HTLV viruses. The average accuracy of all the laboratories and blood banks participating in the EQAP during the study period was 99.5% (standard deviation, 0.5%). Conclusion: The findings of this qualitative analysis are positive for blood safety in Latin America, with an average accuracy of 99.5% among the participating laboratories and blood banks. This report reflects an important improvement in blood bank serological screening EQAP-PAHO report since the 2003.

Application of ventilator-associated events (VAE) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) notified in Brazil (IMPACTO MR-PAV): a protocol for a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Certain criteria for ventilator-associated events (VAE) definition might influence the type of an event, its detection rate and consequently the resource expenditure in intensive care unit. The Impact of Infections by Antimicrobial-Resistant Microorganisms - Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (IMPACTO MR-PAV) aims to evaluate the incidence and diagnostic accuracy of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using the current criteria for VAP surveillance in Brazil versus the VAE criteria defined by the US National Healthcare Safety Network-Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted in around 15 centres across Brazil from October 2022 to December 2023. Trained healthcare professionals will collect data and compare the incidence of VAP using both the current criteria for VAP surveillance in Brazil and the VAE criteria defined by the CDC. The accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be analysed. It will also characterise other events associated with mechanical ventilation (ventilator-associated condition, infection-related ventilator-associated complication) and adjudicate VAP reported to the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board under the number 52354721.0.1001.0070. The study's primary outcome measure will be the incidence of VAP using the two different surveillance criteria, and the secondary outcome measures will be the accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP and the adjudication of VAP reported to ANVISA. The results will contribute to the improvement of VAP surveillance in Brazil and may have implications for other countries that use similar criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05589727; Clinicaltrials.gov.

External quality control program in infectious diseases screening at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America: an analysis of the past 5 years / Programa de control externo de la calidad en el tamizaje de enfermedades infecciosas en laboratorios y bancos de sangre de América Latina: análisis de los últimos 5 años / Programa externo de controle de qualidade na triagem de doenças infecciosas em laboratórios e bancos de sangue da América Latina: análise dos últimos 5 anos

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To evaluate the screening of blood samples for infectious disease markers at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America per the findings of an External Quality Assessment Program (EQAP). Methods. This qualitative analysis used data from the EQAP coordinated by the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo with the support of the Pan American Health Organization to assess the performance of blood screening for infectious diseases from 2014 to 2018 in Latin America. Each participating laboratory or blood bank received an identical blind panel with 24 blood samples with variable reactivity for all the screening parameters. Panels were processed at each participating facility and results were returned to the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo for individual and joint analyses. Two types of discrepant results were potential failures: false positive results (FPRs) and false nonreactive results (FNRRs). Results. A total of 23 136 samples were evaluated. Global rates of FPR, FNRR, and concordant results were 0.3%, 1.0% and 98.7%, respectively. Seven FNRRs were found for HBsAg (1.0%), 12 for syphilis (2.6%), and 21 for Chagas disease (2.9%). No FNRRs were found for the HIV, HCV, and HTLV viruses. The average accuracy of all the laboratories and blood banks participating in the EQAP during the study period was 99.5% (standard deviation, 0.5%). Conclusion. The findings of this qualitative analysis are positive for blood safety in Latin America, with an average accuracy of 99.5% among the participating laboratories and blood banks. This report reflects an important improvement in blood bank serological screening EQAP-PAHO report since the 2003.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Evaluar el tamizaje de muestras de sangre en las que se analizan marcadores de enfermedades infecciosas en laboratorios y bancos de sangre de América Latina según los resultados de un programa de evaluación externa de la calidad (EQAP, por su sigla en inglés). Métodos. Este análisis cualitativo utilizó datos del EQAP —coordinado por la Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo con el apoyo de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud— para evaluar la eficacia del tamizaje sanguíneo para la detección de enfermedades infecciosas que se realizó entre el 2014 y el 2018 en América Latina. Cada laboratorio o banco de sangre participante recibió un panel idéntico para análisis a ciegas compuesto por 24 muestras de sangre con reactividad variable para todos los parámetros del tamizaje. Los paneles se procesaron en cada establecimiento participante y los resultados se enviaron a la Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo donde se realizaron análisis individuales y conjuntos. Había dos tipos de resultados discrepantes que eran posibles fallas del tamizaje: los positivos falsos (PF) y los negativos falsos (NF). Resultados. En total se evaluaron 23 136 muestras. Las tasas generales de PF, NF y resultados concordantes fueron, respectivamente, del 0,3%, 1,0% y 98,7%. Se obtuvieron siete NF en casos de HBsAg (1,0%), 12 en casos de sífilis (2,6%) y 21 en casos de enfermedad de Chagas (2,9%). No se obtuvieron NF en casos de infección por virus del VIH, el VHC o el VLTH. La precisión promedio de todos los laboratorios y bancos de sangre participantes en el EQAP durante el periodo de estudio fue del 99,5% (desviación típica: 0,5%). Conclusión. Los resultados de este análisis cualitativo son positivos en lo referente a la seguridad sanguínea en América Latina, con una precisión promedio del 99,5% entre los laboratorios y bancos de sangre participantes. Este informe refleja la considerable mejora del tamizaje serológico que se realiza en los bancos de sangre, en comparación con los resultados del informe del EQAP que contó con el apoyo de la OPS y se publicó en el 2003.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Avaliar a triagem de marcadores de doenças infecciosas em amostras de sangue realizada em laboratórios e bancos de sangue da América Latina de acordo com os resultados de um Programa Externo de Avaliação de Qualidade (EQAP, na sigla em inglês). Métodos. Esta análise qualitativa usou dados do EQAP coordenado pela Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo, com o apoio da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, para avaliar o desempenho da triagem de sangue quanto a doenças infecciosas no período de 2014 a 2018 na América Latina. Cada laboratório ou banco de sangue participante recebeu um painel cego idêntico com 24 amostras de sangue de reatividade variável para todos os parâmetros de triagem. Os painéis foram processados em cada estabelecimento participante e os resultados foram devolvidos à Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo para análises individuais e conjuntas. Dois tipos de resultados discrepantes representavam falhas em potencial: resultados falso-positivos e resultados falso-negativos (não reativos). Resultados. Foram avaliadas 23.136 amostras. As taxas globais de resultados falso-positivos, falso-negativos e concordantes foram de 0,3%, 1,0% e 98,7%, respectivamente. Foram encontrados sete resultados falso-negativos para HBsAg (1,0%), 12 para sífilis (2,6%) e 21 para doença de Chagas (2,9%). Não houve resultados falso-negativos para os vírus HIV, HCV e HTLV. A acurácia média de todos os laboratórios e bancos de sangue que participaram do EQAP durante o período do estudo foi de 99,5% (desvio padrão de 0,5%). Conclusões. Os resultados desta análise qualitativa são positivos para a segurança do sangue na América Latina, com uma acurácia média de 99,5% entre os laboratórios e bancos de sangue participantes. Este rela- tório reflete uma melhoria importante na triagem sorológica dos bancos de sangue em relação aos resultados do relatório do EQAP apoiado pela OPAS que foi publicado em 2003.

Comparison of characteristics and laboratory tests of COVID-19 hematological patients from France and Brazil during the pre-vaccination period: identification of prognostic profiles for survival

ABSTRACT Introduction: COVID-19 disease presentation is heterogeneous, from asymptomatic up to severe life-threatening forms. Getting further insights into patients with specific diseases is of particular interest. We aimed to identify profiles of hematology patients hospitalized with COVID-19 that would be associated with survival and to assess the differences between cohorts Methods: A binational cohort of 263 patients with COVID-19 and hematological disease was studied in Paris, France and São Paulo, Brazil. Patient profiles were based on age, comorbidities, biological measurements, COVID-19 symptoms and hematological disease characteristics. A semi-supervised learning method with a survival endpoint was first used, following which, a classifier was identified to allow the classification of patients using only baseline information Main results: Two profiles of patients were identified, one being young patients with few comorbidities and low C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatinine levels, and the other, older patients, with several comorbidities and high levels of the 4 biology markers. The profiles were strongly associated with survival (p < 0.0001), even after adjusting for age (p = 0.0002). The 30-day survival rate was 77.1% in the first profiles, versus 46.7% in the second. The Brazilian analysis emphasized the importance of age, while the French focused on the comorbidities Conclusion: This analysis showed the importance of CRP, LHD and creatinine in the COVID-19 presentation and prognosis, whatever the geographic origin of the patients.

Rivaroxaban to prevent major clinical outcomes in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: the CARE - COALITION VIII randomised clinical trial.

Background: COVID-19 progression is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. Randomised trials have demonstrated that anticoagulants reduce the risk of thromboembolism in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, but a benefit of routine anticoagulation has not been demonstrated in the outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a randomised, open-label, controlled, multicentre study, evaluating the use of rivaroxaban in mild or moderate COVID-19 patients. Adults ≥18 years old, with probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, presenting within ≤7 days from symptom onset with no clear indication for hospitalization, plus at least 2 risk factors for complication, were randomised 1:1 either to rivaroxaban 10 mg OD for 14 days or to routine care. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of venous thromboembolic events, need of mechanical ventilation, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, or death due to COVID-19 during the first 30 days. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04757857. Findings: Enrollment was prematurely stopped due to sustained reduction in new COVID-19 cases. From September 29th, 2020, through May 23rd, 2022, 660 patients were randomised (median age 61 [Q1-Q3 47-69], 55.7% women). There was no significant difference between rivaroxaban and control in the primary efficacy endpoint (4.3% [14/327] vs 5.8% [19/330], RR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46). There was no major bleeding in the control group and 1 in the rivaroxaban group. Interpretation: On light of these findings no decision can be made about the utility of rivaroxaban to improve outcomes in outpatients with COVID-19. Metanalyses data provide no evidence of a benefit of anticoagulant prophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19. These findings were the result of an underpowered study, therefore should be interpreted with caution. Funding: COALITION COVID-19 Brazil and Bayer S.A.

External quality control program in infectious diseases screening at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America: an analysis of the past 5 years / Programa de control externo de la calidad en el tamizaje de enfermedades infecciosas en laboratorios y bancos de sangre de América Latina: análisis de los últimos 5 años / Programa externo de controle de qualidade na triagem de doenças infecciosas em laboratórios e bancos de sangue da América Latina: análise dos últimos 5 anos

ABSTRACT Objective. To evaluate the screening of blood samples for infectious disease markers at laboratories and blood banks in Latin America per the findings of an External Quality Assessment Program (EQAP). Methods. This qualitative analysis used data from the EQAP coordinated by the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo with the support of the Pan American Health Organization to assess the performance of blood screening for infectious diseases from 2014 to 2018 in Latin America. Each participating laboratory or blood bank received an identical blind panel with 24 blood samples with variable reactivity for all the screening parameters. Panels were processed at each participating facility and results were returned to the Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo for individual and joint analyses. Two types of discrepant results were potential failures: false positive results (FPRs) and false nonreactive results (FNRRs). Results. A total of 23 136 samples were evaluated. Global rates of FPR, FNRR, and concordant results were 0.3%, 1.0% and 98.7%, respectively. Seven FNRRs were found for HBsAg (1.0%), 12 for syphilis (2.6%), and 21 for Chagas disease (2.9%). No FNRRs were found for the HIV, HCV, and HTLV viruses. The average accuracy of all the laboratories and blood banks participating in the EQAP during the study period was 99.5% (standard deviation, 0.5%). Conclusion. The findings of this qualitative analysis are positive for blood safety in Latin America, with an average accuracy of 99.5% among the participating laboratories and blood banks. This report reflects an important improvement in blood bank serological screening EQAP-PAHO report since the 2003.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Evaluar el tamizaje de muestras de sangre en las que se analizan marcadores de enfermedades infecciosas en laboratorios y bancos de sangre de América Latina según los resultados de un programa de evaluación externa de la calidad (EQAP, por su sigla en inglés). Métodos. Este análisis cualitativo utilizó datos del EQAP —coordinado por la Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo con el apoyo de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud— para evaluar la eficacia del tamizaje sanguíneo para la detección de enfermedades infecciosas que se realizó entre el 2014 y el 2018 en América Latina. Cada laboratorio o banco de sangre participante recibió un panel idéntico para análisis a ciegas compuesto por 24 muestras de sangre con reactividad variable para todos los parámetros del tamizaje. Los paneles se procesaron en cada establecimiento participante y los resultados se enviaron a la Fundação Pro Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo donde se realizaron análisis individuales y conjuntos. Había dos tipos de resultados discrepantes que eran posibles fallas del tamizaje: los positivos falsos (PF) y los negativos falsos (NF). Resultados. En total se evaluaron 23 136 muestras. Las tasas generales de PF, NF y resultados concordantes fueron, respectivamente, del 0,3%, 1,0% y 98,7%. Se obtuvieron siete NF en casos de HBsAg (1,0%), 12 en casos de sífilis (2,6%) y 21 en casos de enfermedad de Chagas (2,9%). No se obtuvieron NF en casos de infección por virus del VIH, el VHC o el VLTH. La precisión promedio de todos los laboratorios y bancos de sangre participantes en el EQAP durante el periodo de estudio fue del 99,5% (desviación típica: 0,5%). Conclusión. Los resultados de este análisis cualitativo son positivos en lo referente a la seguridad sanguínea en América Latina, con una precisión promedio del 99,5% entre los laboratorios y bancos de sangre participantes. Este informe refleja la considerable mejora del tamizaje serológico que se realiza en los bancos de sangre, en comparación con los resultados del informe del EQAP que contó con el apoyo de la OPS y se publicó en el 2003.

RESUMO Objetivo. Avaliar a triagem de marcadores de doenças infecciosas em amostras de sangue realizada em laboratórios e bancos de sangue da América Latina de acordo com os resultados de um Programa Externo de Avaliação de Qualidade (EQAP, na sigla em inglês). Métodos. Esta análise qualitativa usou dados do EQAP coordenado pela Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo, com o apoio da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, para avaliar o desempenho da triagem de sangue quanto a doenças infecciosas no período de 2014 a 2018 na América Latina. Cada laboratório ou banco de sangue participante recebeu um painel cego idêntico com 24 amostras de sangue de reatividade variável para todos os parâmetros de triagem. Os painéis foram processados em cada estabelecimento participante e os resultados foram devolvidos à Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo para análises individuais e conjuntas. Dois tipos de resultados discrepantes representavam falhas em potencial: resultados falso-positivos e resultados falso-negativos (não reativos). Resultados. Foram avaliadas 23.136 amostras. As taxas globais de resultados falso-positivos, falso-negativos e concordantes foram de 0,3%, 1,0% e 98,7%, respectivamente. Foram encontrados sete resultados falso-negativos para HBsAg (1,0%), 12 para sífilis (2,6%) e 21 para doença de Chagas (2,9%). Não houve resultados falso-negativos para os vírus HIV, HCV e HTLV. A acurácia média de todos os laboratórios e bancos de sangue que participaram do EQAP durante o período do estudo foi de 99,5% (desvio padrão de 0,5%). Conclusões. Os resultados desta análise qualitativa são positivos para a segurança do sangue na América Latina, com uma acurácia média de 99,5% entre os laboratórios e bancos de sangue participantes. Este relatório reflete uma melhoria importante na triagem sorológica dos bancos de sangue em relação aos resultados do relatório do EQAP apoiado pela OPAS que foi publicado em 2003.

Consolidative mediastinal radiotherapy for advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma with bulky disease in patients who achieve complete response after chemotherapy in PET-CT era.

Background: The role of consolidation mediastinal radiotherapy (RT) for mediastinal bulky disease in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is controversial in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) era. Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical charts of patients with advanced-stage (clinical stage IIX-IVX) cHL and mediastinal bulky that achieved a complete response after first line chemotherapy treatment between August 2010 and December 2020 and compared the results of those who received with those who did not receive consolidation mediastinal RT. Inclusion criteria required PET-CT imaging for staging and response assessment. Results: We included 115 patients; 91 received mediastinal RT and 24 did not. Patient's characteristics were balanced between the two groups. The median age in patients that received and did not receive mediastinal RT was 28 years and 24.5 years, respectively. Median International Prognostic Score among patients that received and did not receive mediastinal RT was 2 and 2.5, respectively. Disease free survival (DFS) was statistically better in patients that received mediastinal RT (p = 0.013). Two-year DFS for patients that received and did not receive mediastinal RT was 95.2% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 87.6-98.2%] and 76.4% (95% CI: 52.2-89.4%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) was not different between the two groups (p = 0.617). In multivariate analysis, not receiving mediastinal radiotherapy and only achieving partial response (vs. complete response) after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were factors predictive of lower DFS. Conclusion: DFS, but not OS, was superior in patients that received mediastinal RT.

Systemic amyloidosis journey from diagnosis to outcomes: a twelve-year real-world experience of a single center in a middle-income country.

BACKGROUND: Systemic amyloidosis is caused by the deposition of misfolded protein aggregates in tissues, leading to progressive organ dysfunction and death. Epidemiological studies originate predominantly from high-income countries, with few data from Latin America. Due to the non-specific clinical manifestations, diagnosing amyloidosis is often challenging and patients experience a long journey and delay in diagnosis. This study aimed to assess clinical and laboratory characteristics, the diagnostic journey, and outcomes of patients with biopsy-proven systemic amyloidosis diagnosed between 2009 and 2020 at a university referral center in a middle-income Latin American country. Patients´ medical records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years and 54% were male. Until the diagnosis, most of the patients (52%) were seen by at least 3 specialists, the main ones being: general practitioners (57%), nephrologists (45%), and cardiologists (38%). The most common manifestations were renal (54%) and cardiac (41%) disorders, and cachexia was seen in 36% of patients. In 72% of the cases, ≥ 2 biopsies were required until the final diagnosis. The median time from symptoms onset to diagnosis was 10.9 months, and most patients (75%) had ≥ 2 organs involved. The following subtypes were identified: AL (68%), ATTR (13%), AA (8%), AFib (4%), and inconclusive (7%). Median OS was 74.3 months in the non-AL subgroup and 18.5 months in AL. Among AL patients, those with advanced cardiac stage had the worst outcome [median OS 8.6 months versus 52.3 for stage III versus I-II, respectively (p < 0.001)]. AL subtype, cardiac involvement, and ECOG ≥ 2 were identified as independent risk factors for reduced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic amyloidosis is still an underdiagnosed condition and the delay in its recognition leads to poor outcomes. Medical education, better diagnostic tools, improvement in access to therapies, and establishment of referral centers may improve patient outcomes in middle-income countries.

TET-2 mutations predict poor outcomes and are associated with unfavorable clinical-biological features in PTCL, not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma in Brazilian patients.

INTRODUCTION: Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas [nPTCL] constitute a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies with aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis. Epigenetic phenomena involving genes that control DNA-methylation and histone deacetylation play a central role in their pathogenesis. However, the mutational landscape involving epigenetic regulators has never been reported in Latin American patients and their prognostic impact remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2019, 59-Brazilian patients with nPTCL were eligible for screening mutations in the IDH-1, IDH-2, RHOA, TET-2 and DNMT3A genes by Sanger sequencing at Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded samples [FFPE] of diagnosis. We reported the frequency, distribution and potential prognosis of these mutations. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 3.70 years, estimate 2-year OS and PFS were 57.1% and 49.2%, respectively. Mutations in the IDH-1 gene were not found, mutations in the IDH-2 occurred in 3.4% (2/59), RHOA in 23.7% (14/59), TET-2 in 50.8% (30/59) and DNMT3A in 62.7% (37/59). RHOA gene mutations were more frequent in PTCL, NOS and AITL (p= 0.06). Almost half of the patients had more than one mutation in concomitance, particularly RHOA-mut and TET-2-mut. Mutations in RHOA (p= 0.030) and TET-2 (p= 0.046) were associated with high-tumor burden. In the non-ALCL subgroup (PTCL, NOS and AITL) TET-2 mutations were associated with decreased 2-year PFS [HR: 2.22, p= 0.048]. Likewise with lower overall response rate [ORR] (p= 0.048) and unfavorable clinical features, as bulky disease (p= 0.012), ECOG ⩾ 2 (p= 0.032), B-symptoms (p= 0.012), ⩾ 2 extranodal sites compromised (p= 0.022) and high-risk Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma (p= 0.005). CONCLUSION: Mutations in RHOA, TET-2 and DNMT3A were frequent in Brazilian patients with nPTCL. TET-2 mutations were associated with lower ORR for CHOP-like chemotherapy, decreased PFS and unfavorable clinical-biological characteristics in non-ALCL (PTCL, NOS and AITL). Further studies using a larger cohort may validate our findings.

Soluble CD137 as a potential biomarker for severe COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a highly pathogenic infection responsible for the world pandemic in 2020. COVID-19 is characterized by an increased number of critically ill patients with a high risk of health care system collapse. Therefore, the search for severity biomarkers and potential therapies is crucial. In this study, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 -induced cytokines, cytokines receptors and growth factors profile, in critical COVID-19 patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) aiming to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We designed a prospective study enrolling 62 adults with severe COVID-19 during the first two Brazilian COVID-19 waves (from May to July 2020 and December 2020 to May 2021), convenience samples recruitment in first 24 hours and then, every 4 days until day 20 of ICU admission from a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Controls were healthy blood donors. Whole blood was used to evaluate 17 cytokines, cytokines receptors and growth factors. Due to low mortality rate, we used the need of mechanical ventilation as primary endpoint. In our analysis, we found a different pattern in soluble CD137 (sCD137) in critically ill patients with COVID-19, with a direct relationship between increased levels and worse clinical outcome. sCD137 was related with increased risk of mechanical ventilation and World Health Organization (WHO) clinical score for disease severity. CD137 is a tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF) family member, mainly responsible for T-cell activation. Soluble isoforms of immune checkpoints competitively regulate function of their membrane-bound counterparts. Our study demonstrated the onward increase in sCD137 levels during severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and its correlation with worse outcomes, suggesting sCD137 as a potential reliable severity biomarker.

Correlation between SARS-COV-2 antibody screening by immunoassay and neutralizing antibody testing.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP), an alternative for the treatment of COVID-19, depends on high titers of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), but assays for quantifying nAbs are not widely available. Our goal was to develop a strategy to predict high titers of nAbs based on the results of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays and the clinical characteristics of CP donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 214 CP donors were enrolled and tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG) using two commercial immunoassays: EUROIMMUN (ELISA) and Abbott (Chemiluminescence). Quantification of nAbs was performed using the Cytopathic Effect-based Virus Neutralization test. Three criteria for identifying donors with nAbs ≥ 1:160 were tested: - C1: Curve ROC; - C2: Conditional decision tree considering only the IA results and - C3: Conditional decision tree including both the IA results and the clinical variables. RESULTS: The performance of the immunoassays was similar referring to both S/CO and predictive value for identifying nAbs titers ≥1:160. Regarding the studied criteria for identifying CP donors with high nAbs titers: (a) C1 showed 76.1% accuracy if S/CO = 4.65, (b) C2 presented 76.1% accuracy if S/CO ≥4.57 and (c) C3 had 71.6% accuracy if S/CO was ≥4.57 or if S/CO was between 2.68-4.57 and the last COVID-19-related symptoms were recent (within 19 days). CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays (S/CO) can be used to predict high anti-SARS-CoV-2 nAbs titers. This study has proposed different criteria for identifying donors with ≥1:160 nAbs titers, all with high efficacy.

Adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de medida do cuidado centrado na família / Cross-cultural adaptation of an instrument to measure the family-centered care

Realizar a adaptação transcultural para a língua portuguesa brasileira de dois instrumentos de medida do cuidado centrado na família, um para pais e outro para profissionais da equipe de saúde. Métodos Estudo metodológico de adaptação transcultural seguindo as etapas de tradução, retrotradução, análise de especialistas, pré-teste, teste-reteste e análise psicométrica após aplicação do instrumento com 100 pais de crianças hospitalizadas e 100 profissionais de unidades pediátricas de um hospital universitário. Resultados A avaliação por especialistas de ambos os instrumentos apresentaram Kappa de 0,85 e 0,93 respectivamente. No pré-teste, os participantes não sugeriram alterações. No teste-reteste houve bons índices de estabilidade em ambos. A análise fatorial explicou 43,9% da variância total no instrumento pais e 43,4% no instrumento equipe. O coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach foi 0,723 no instrumento pais e 0,781 no instrumento equipe. Conclusão Os instrumentos adaptados para a cultura brasileira apresentaram confiabilidade, estabilidade e boa consistência interna com potencial para ser utilizado na pratica clinica pediátrica...

To assess the cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese of two instruments for the measurement of family-centered care, one for parents and one for healthcare professionals. Methods Methodological study of cross-cultural adaptation following the phases of translation, back-translation, analysis by experts, pre-test, test-retest and psychometric analysis after the application of the instrument to 100 parents of hospitalized children and 100 professionals from pediatric units of a teaching hospital. Results The evaluation of experts in both instruments showed a Kappa of 0.85 and 0.93 respectively. At pretest, participants suggested no changes. Test-retest reliability was good for both stability indexes. Factor analysis explained 43.9% of the total variance in the parents instrument and 43.4% in the staff instrument. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.723 for the parents instrument and 0.781 for the staff instrument. Conclusion The instruments adapted to the Brazilian culture presented reliability, stability and good internal consistency, with potential to be used in the pediatric clinical practice...

Functional Capacity of Patients with Pacemaker Due to Isolated Congenital Atrioventricular Block / Capacidade Funcional de Portadores de Marca-Passo por Bloqueio Atrioventricular Congênito Isolado

Background: Isolated congenital atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a rare condition with multiple clinical outcomes. Ventricular remodeling can occur in approximately 10% of the patients after pacemaker (PM) implantation. Objectives: To assess the functional capacity of children and young adults with isolated CAVB and chronic pacing of the right ventricle (RV) and evaluate its correlation with predictors of ventricular remodeling. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a cohort of patients with isolated CAVB and RV pacing for over a year. The subjects underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. Functional capacity was assessed using the six-minute walk test. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used, considering a significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 61 individuals were evaluated between March 2010 and December 2013, of which 67.2% were women, aged between 7 and 41 years, who were using PMs for 13.5 ± 6.3 years. The percentage of ventricular pacing was 97.9 ± 4.1%, and the duration of the paced QRS complex was 153.7 ± 19.1 ms. Majority of the subjects (95.1%) were asymptomatic and did not use any medication. The mean distance walked was 546.9 ± 76.2 meters and was strongly correlated with the predicted distance (r = 0.907, p = 0.001) but not with risk factors for ventricular remodeling. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0) Conclusions: The functional capacity of isolated CAVB patients with chronic RV pacing was satisfactory but did not correlate with risk factors for ventricular remodeling. .

Fundamento: O bloqueio atrioventricular congênito isolado (BAVCi) é raro e tem múltiplas apresentações clínicas. O remodelamento ventricular pode ocorrer em cerca de 10% dos indivíduos após o implante de marca-passo. Objetivos: Avaliar a capacidade funcional de crianças e adultos jovens com BAVCi e estimulação crônica no ventrículo direito (VD) e pesquisar sua associação com fatores preditores de remodelamento ventricular. Métodos: Estudo transversal em coorte de indivíduos com BAVCi e estimulação no VD há mais de um ano. Os indivíduos foram submetidos a avaliação clínica e ecocardiográfica. A capacidade funcional foi avaliada pelo teste de caminhada de seis minutos. Foram empregados os testes qui-quadrado, exato de Fisher e coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: De março de 2010 a dezembro de 2013, foram avaliados 61 indivíduos, 67,2% do sexo feminino, com 7-41 anos de idade e uso de MP há 13,5 ± 6,3 anos. O percentual de estimulação ventricular era 97,9 ± 4,1% e a duração do complexo QRS estimulado era de 153,7 ± 19,1 ms. A maioria (95,1%) era assintomática e não utilizava medicamentos. A distância média percorrida de 546,9 ± 76,2 m teve forte correlação com a distância predita (r = 0,907; p = 0,001) e não se associou com os fatores de risco de remodelamento estudados. Conclusões: A capacidade funcional de portadores de BAVTCi com estimulação crônica no VD foi satisfatória e não se correlacionou com os fatores de risco para remodelamento ventricular. .

Functional capacity of patients with pacemaker due to isolated congenital atrioventricular block.

BACKGROUND: Isolated congenital atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a rare condition with multiple clinical outcomes. Ventricular remodeling can occur in approximately 10% of the patients after pacemaker (PM) implantation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the functional capacity of children and young adults with isolated CAVB and chronic pacing of the right ventricle (RV) and evaluate its correlation with predictors of ventricular remodeling. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a cohort of patients with isolated CAVB and RV pacing for over a year. The subjects underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. Functional capacity was assessed using the six-minute walk test. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used, considering a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 61 individuals were evaluated between March 2010 and December 2013, of which 67.2% were women, aged between 7 and 41 years, who were using PMs for 13.5 ± 6.3 years. The percentage of ventricular pacing was 97.9 ± 4.1%, and the duration of the paced QRS complex was 153.7 ± 19.1 ms. Majority of the subjects (95.1%) were asymptomatic and did not use any medication. The mean distance walked was 546.9 ± 76.2 meters and was strongly correlated with the predicted distance (r = 0.907, p = 0.001) but not with risk factors for ventricular remodeling. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0) CONCLUSIONS: The functional capacity of isolated CAVB patients with chronic RV pacing was satisfactory but did not correlate with risk factors for ventricular remodeling.