Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World Neurosurg ; 2024 Sep 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265938

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Matsushima Grade has traditionally been used to evaluate vessel ingrowth from the STA after EDAS for MMD-patients. However, this grading is subjective and prone to measurement variability. Herein, we propose the orbital grading system quantifying leptomeningeal and burr hole-related vessel-ingrowth from the STA and/or MMA to the middle and anterior cerebral arteries post-EDAS in MMD patients. METHODS: An anatomical classification was developed by reference to two parallel vertical lines from the bony landmarks of the orbit, categorized from Grade 0-3. Regression models were used to compare clinical and functional outcomes of our grading system with the Matsushima scale. RESULTS: Forty MMD patients, with median age of 48 years, mostly females (72.5%), were included. Presentation included ischemic events (65.0%), hemorrhage (22.5%), and seizures (7.5%). Most patients were categorized as Suzuki ≥ IV (69.5%). Fifty EDAS (89.9%) had concurrent burr holes placed (parietal and frontal regions). At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, collateral growth was graded as follows: grade 0 (6;10.8%), grade 1 (12;21.4%), grade 2 (23;41.1%) and grade 3 (15;26.8%). Linear regression showed similarities in the distribution between the orbital grading system and Matsushima grading (r=0.86;p<0.01). Ischemic events were fewer in hemispheres categorized as grade 2-3 compared to grade 0-1 (p=0.047) as well as in Matsushima grading A or B compared to C (p=0.047). CONCLUSION: The orbital grading system demonstrated agreement in identifying postoperative ischemic events as the Matsushima grade and provides a more practical and objective evaluation of collateral vessel ingrowth after EDAS with and without burr-holes.

2.
World Neurosurg ; 189: e168-e176, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906476

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the length of stay (LOS) in patients who had adjunct middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma after conventional surgery and determine the factors influencing the LOS in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review of 107 cases with MMAE after conventional surgery between September 2018 and January 2024 was performed. Factors associated with prolonged LOS were identified through univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The median LOS for MMAE after conventional surgery was 9 days (interquartile range = 6-17), with a 3-day interval between procedures (interquartile range = 2-5). Among 107 patients, 58 stayed ≤ 9 days, while 49 stayed longer. Univariable analysis showed the interval between procedures, type of surgery, MMAE sedation, and the number of complications associated with prolonged LOS. Multivariable analysis confirmed longer intervals between procedures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; P < 0.01), ≥2 medical complications (OR = 13.34; P = 0.01), and neurological complications (OR = 5.28; P = 0.05) were independent factors for lengthier hospitalizations. There was a trending association between general anesthesia during MMAE and prolonged LOS (P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis revealed diabetes (OR = 5.25; P = 0.01) and ≥2 medical complications (OR = 5.21; P = 0.03) correlated with a LOS over 20 days, the 75th percentile in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between procedures and the number of medical and neurological complications were strongly associated with prolonged LOS in patients who had adjunct MMAE after open surgery. Reducing the interval between the procedures and potentially performing both under 1 anesthetic may decrease the burden on patients and shorten their hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Hematoma Subdural Crônico , Tempo de Internação , Artérias Meníngeas , Humanos , Hematoma Subdural Crônico/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Idoso , Artérias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Cureus ; 16(3): e57103, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681287

RESUMO

Even after clipping of intracranial aneurysms, patients may experience incomplete occlusion or the future recurrence of their treated aneurysm. This paper presents a distinctive case of a recurrent A1-A2 anterior cerebral artery aneurysm that underwent four interventions over 16 years. The aneurysm was treated with two clippings, subsequent coiling, and flow diversion for definitive treatment. The challenges encountered in managing bifurcation aneurysms are discussed, emphasizing the importance of considering hemodynamic factors, vessel geometry, and recurrence risk factors in treatment decisions. The case highlights the need for closer follow-up of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms due to the higher likelihood of recurrence. The role of flow diverters in reinforcing vessel anatomy and preventing recurrence is also highlighted.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA