Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(10): 1921-1928, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556650

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite the recent growing interest of the scientific community, there is still no consensus on the actual applicability and effectiveness of sentinel lymph node (SL) procedure in colon cancers. This study aims to quantify feasibility, detection rate, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the SL identified with fluorescent dye in early colon cancers (ECC). METHODS: This study conducted a consecutive sampling of 95 patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer who have been treated with laparoscopic colon resection and complete mesocolic excision after a 25-mg indocyanine green peritumoral laparoscopic injection and SL identification with a near-infrared camera. The SL was later isolated and sent to ultra-staging. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with an average age of 71 (range 37-90) and a mean BMI of 25 (range 18-39) have been recruited. On the patient sample (92 Pts), an average of 1.49 SL (range 1-5) and a mean time of 4 min were identified. The detection rate was 96.8% and the negative predictive value and accuracy rates were 96.2% and 93.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping the SL with fluorescent dye can play an important role in the treatment of colon cancers, particularly those at early stages, and can lead to ultra-conservative surgery.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Linfonodo Sentinela , Idoso , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela
2.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 38(5): 537-41, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26816257

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Rectus sheath haematoma (RSH) is an uncommon condition caused by lesion of the superior or inferior epigastric arteries or their branches or by rupture of the rectus muscle. Treatment is usually supportive; however, if haemodynamic compromise develops, intravascular embolisation or surgery may be required. Furthermore, in some cases, bleeding may be so conspicuous that it can determine the patient's death before an adequate treatment is performed. We performed a retrospective study on 78 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of RSH admitted to the General Surgery Unit of our hospital between January 2000 and December 2010 in order to identify possible prognostic risk factors that could affect the operational approach before the onset of haemodynamic instability. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, patient history, laboratory and diagnostic imaging examinations were investigated. The variables considered were: gender, age, anti-coagulation or anti-platelet therapy, trauma, international normalised ratio (INR) and bleeding time in the first 72 h of observation and concomitant diseases. The data were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixty patients received a conservative treatment, while 18 underwent operative treatment for haemodynamic instability (embolisation in 2 patients and surgery in 16 patients). Three of these 18 patients (17 %) died for consumption coagulopathy after surgery. None of the variables included in the univariate statistical analysis was significant (p = ns). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography or computed tomography are the most common methods used to establish the diagnosis of RSH, so it is no longer a diagnostic dilemma. Most patients can be treated conservatively and an operative treatment is justified only in case of haemodynamic instability. Our retrospective study could not identify any prognostic risk factor of haemodynamic instability in RSH. We believe that only a close observation of the patients with RSH and "common sense" can prevent a possible fatal outcome.

3.
Br J Surg ; 94(8): 937-42, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17636512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized prospective trial was to compare LigaSure and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-four patients with grade III or IV haemorrhoids were randomized to LigaSure or diathermy (Milligan-Morgan) haemorrhoidectomy as a day-case procedure. Operating time, postoperative pain score, hospital stay, postoperative complications, wound healing time and time to return to normal activities were assessed. Thirty-four patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: The mean operating time for LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy was significantly shorter than that for diathermy (P = 0.011). Patients treated with LigaSure had significantly less postoperative pain (measured on a visual analogue scale; P = 0.010), a shorter wound healing time (defined as time to absence of swelling; P = 0.012) and less time off work (P = 0.010) than patients who had diathermy. Neither postoperative complications nor mean hospital stay (day-case surgery) were significantly different. CONCLUSION: LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy demonstrates simplicity, reproducibility, a low complication rate, fast wound healing, a quick return to work and reduced postoperative pain.


Assuntos
Diatermia/métodos , Hemorroidas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...