Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 79(3): 1033-1040, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33459707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There exist functional deficits in motor, sensory, and olfactory abilities in dementias. Measures of these deficits have been discussed as potential clinical markers. OBJECTIVE: We measured the deficit of motor, sensory, and olfactory functions on both the left and right body side, to study potential body lateralizations. METHODS: This IRB-approved study (N = 84) performed left/right clinical tests of gross motor (dynamometer test), sensory (Von Frey test), and olfactory (peppermint oil test) ability. The Mini-Mental Status Exam was administered to determine level of dementia; medical and laboratory data were collected. RESULTS: Sensory and olfactory deficits lateralized to the left side of the body, while motor deficits lateralized to the right side. We found clinical correlates of motor lateralization: female, depression, MMSE <15, and diabetes. While clinical correlates of sensory lateralization: use of psychotherapeutic agent, age ≥85, MMSE <15, and male. Lastly, clinical correlates of olfactory lateralization: age <85, number of medications >10, and male. CONCLUSION: These lateralized deficits in body function can act as early clinical markers for improved diagnosis and treatment. Future research should identify correlates and corresponding therapies to strengthen at-risk areas.


Assuntos
Demência/complicações , Transtornos Motores/etiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Transtornos de Sensação/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores , Demência/patologia , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Motores/patologia , Transtornos do Olfato/patologia , Transtornos de Sensação/patologia
2.
J Clin Anesth ; 61: 109658, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31784304

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature to evaluate the association between labor epidural analgesia (LEA) and postpartum depression (PPD). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: Obstetric patients delivering vaginally with or without LEA in a hospital. INTERVENTIONS: This study aimed to investigate the effects of providing LEA on developing PPD. MEASUREMENTS: Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 356 full text articles were reviewed. Eleven articles studying 85,928 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled unadjusted OR 1.03 and 95% CI (0.77, 1.37) suggest that LEA is not associated with a decreased risk of developing PPD. CONCLUSIONS: Labor epidural analgesia was not shown to confer protection against developing PPD according to this meta-analysis. Future studies are needed to explore whether other aspects of LEA, beyond its presence or absence, influence the onset of PPD.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Depressão Pós-Parto , Trabalho de Parto , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Razão de Chances , Gravidez
3.
Neurology ; 94(6): e626-e634, 2020 02 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31831599

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sacral anatomical interspace landmark (SAIL) technique is more accurate than the classic intercristal line (ICL) technique in pregnant patients and to assess the percentage of clinical determinations above the third lumbar vertebra. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open-label trial, there were 110 singleton pregnant patients with gestational age greater than 37 weeks included. Selection procedure was a convenience sample of pregnant patients who presented for office visits or vaginal or cesarean delivery between March 15 and July 31, 2018, at a single-center obstetric tertiary care university hospital. Both techniques were evaluated by 2 physicians independently assessing each method. Before data collection, we hypothesized that the SAIL technique would be more accurate than the ICL technique in determining the L4-L5 interspace, and that the SAIL technique would produce more estimations below the third lumbar vertebra than the ICL technique. Therefore, the primary outcome was accuracy in identifying the L4-L5 lumbar interspace with SAIL vs ICL. The secondary outcome was difference in clinical assessments above the third lumbar vertebra. Both outcomes were measured via ultrasonography. RESULTS: Patients were 31 ± 5 years of age (mean ± SD) and had body mass index of 31.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2 and gestational age of 38.8 ± 1.1 weeks. A total of 110 patients were analyzed. SAIL correctly identified the L4-L5 interspace 49% of the time vs 8% using ICL (p < 0.0001). Estimations above L3 were 1% for SAIL vs 31% for ICL (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows improved accuracy in identifying intervertebral space using the SAIL technique; this may prevent direct mechanical trauma to the conus medullaris when lumbar punctures are performed in pregnancy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03433612.


Assuntos
Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Ílio/anatomia & histologia , Vértebras Lombares/anatomia & histologia , Sacro/anatomia & histologia , Punção Espinal/métodos , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Exame Físico , Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...