Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a review.

BACKGROUND: Over 12.2 million Americans are affected by acute coronary syndromes (ACS) resulting from arterial thrombosis after atherosclerotic plaque rupture. The mechanism of thrombosis is based on the platelet activation pathway, facilitated by expression of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) lIb/Illa receptors. The platelet GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors represent a new class of drugs, of which abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have been approved for use in the medical management of ACS and as adjunctive therapy in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the results of published multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of the efficacy and safety of platelet GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: To identify articles for this review, a search of MEDLINE for the years 1994 through 2000 was conducted using the key words myocardial ischemia, unstable angina, angioplasty, stent, abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, lamifiban, and platelet aggregation inhibitors. Relevant review articles were consulted as well as reports of clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: Three GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors--abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban-are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as adjunctive therapy in patients undergoing PCI. Eptifibatide and tirofiban 'are also indicated for the medical management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The use of GP IIb/IIIa-receptor inhibitors as a component of management with fibrinolytic agents is under investigation. Studies comparing the efficacy of tirofiban and abciximab in patients undergoing planned PCI with intracoronary stent placement are in progress. Until data are available from long-term trials and head-to-head comparisons of these agents, it is not possible to generalize about their overall or comparative efficacy.

Pneumococcal resistance: the treatment challenge.

OBJECTIVE: To review in vitro and in vivo information dealing with pneumococcal antibiotic resistance and provide a review of the incidence, mechanisms, and controversies surrounding this growing problem. The review is also intended to provide clinicians with relevant recommendations on treatment and prevention of this organism. DATA SOURCES AND SELECTION: Primary and review articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1966-August 2000) and through secondary resources such as conference proceedings. All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: The growing incidence and reporting of pneumococcal isolates that are resistant to one or more classes of antibiotics have become a troubling trend that has resulted in significant shifts in treatment. Although clinicians have shifted to a new generation or class of antibiotics when faced with a resistance trend, data with resistant pneumococci show that this may not be necessary. By incorporating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of antimicrobials into the decision-making process, many of the drugs that we have become hesitant to use due to this resistance may still be appropriate if used correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate dosing of antimicrobials, combined with optimal use of pneumococcal vaccines, will not only prolong the longevity of some agents, but also hopefully slow resistance development.