Digital application developed to evaluate functional results following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: App for prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Mobile applications ("apps") developed for smartphones and tablets are increasingly used in healthcare, allowing remote patient support or promoting self-health care. Prostate cancer (PC) screening allows for early-stage PC diagnosis, resulting in high rates of curative procedures such as radical prostatectomy. The main complications following surgery are urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. However, the exact numbers related to these morbidities are often missing due to brief interviews during consultations in the medical office. Therefore, the aim of this study was to create an app to determine whether response rates to pre- and post-surgical PC questionnaires will increase. METHODS: The app was built using the IONIC framework system and provided to patients through a prospective randomized study. We included 100 patients divided into two groups: 1. first group used the app (n = 50); and 2. second group responded via validated printed questionnaires (control group) (n = 50). All patients received discharge counseling to respond to the questionnaires 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. The app group received verbal guidance on how monitoring would occur, received an SMS containing a username and password providing access to the system and received reminder alerts to respond to the questionnaires. RESULTS: The new app is called UroHealth and is available for download in the Apple App Store or at www.urohealth.com.br. When we evaluated the response rates, we found that 42.9% of the patients answered the preoperative questionnaire in the app group, while 16% responded in the control group (p = 0.003). By the end of the follow-up, we found that 24.5% of the patients answered the questionnaire in the app group, while 4% responded in the control group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This app enabled almost 6 times more patients to answer long-term follow-up questions after surgical procedures, providing high-quality information regarding morbidity related to treatment. Although our initial results indicate that this app may become a useful tool in obtaining more frequent and realistic answers, thus helping to improve surgical techniques, other ways of reaching the patient should be tested to achieve higher response rates.

MicroRNA-23b and microRNA-27b plus flutamide treatment enhances apoptosis rate and decreases CCNG1 expression in a castration-resistant prostate cancer cell line.

The acquisition of a castration-resistant prostate cancer phenotype by prostate cancer cells is the alteration that has the worst prognosis for patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the microRNAs-23b/-27b as well as the possible CCNG1 target gene in tissue samples from patients with localized prostate cancer that progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer and in a castration-resistant prostate cancer cell line (PC-3). The microRNAs and target gene expression levels of the surgical specimens were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The prostate cancer cell line, PC-3, was transfected with pre-miR-23b, pre-miR-27b, and their respective controls using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX and exposed or not to flutamide. After transfections, expression levels of both the microRNAs and the gene, CCNG1, were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The apoptosis and cell cycle assays were performed on the mini MUSE cytometer. MicroRNAs-23b/-27b were underexpressed in surgical specimens of prostate cancer; however, their target gene, CCNG1, was overexpressed in 69% of the cases. After transfection with the microRNAs-23b/-27b and flutamide, we observed a reduction in gene expression compared with cells that were treated only with microRNAs or only with flutamide. In the apoptosis assay, we demonstrated cell sensitization following transfection with microRNAs-23b/-27b and potentiation when co-administered with flutamide. The number of cells in apoptosis was almost three times higher with the simultaneous treatments (miR + flutamide) compared with the control (p < 0.05). In the cell cycle assay, only flutamide treatment showed better results; a higher number of cells were found in the G0-G1 phase, and a lower percentage of cells completed the final phase of the cycle (p < 0.05). We conclude that microRNAs-23b/-27b are downexpressed in prostate cancer, and their target gene, CCNG1, is overexpressed. We postulated that microRNAs-23b/-27b sensitize the PC-3 cell line and that after the addition of flutamide in the apoptosis assay, we would observe synergism in the treatments between miR and flutamide. In the cell cycle assay, the use of flutamide was sufficient to decrease the number of cells in mitosis. Therefore, we postulate that microRNAs, along with other drugs, may become very useful therapeutic tools in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.