Higher activity level after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy compared to medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty in a selected cohort of advanced age: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) are accepted treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients often present meeting indications for both procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare results after MOWHTO and UKA in a matched population of patients older than 50 years. METHOD: A retrospective analysis searching for patients older than 50 years meeting indication both for UKA and MOWHTO was performed. A propensity score matching (PSM) based on demographics and clinical data was performed. Tegner activity scale (TAS), Lysholm knee score (LKS) and numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) were recorded prospectively prior to surgery, at 6 months and after a minimum of 4 years. RESULTS: 64 UKA and 71 MOWHTO were found. Mean follow up was similar (54,05 ± 4,80 and 52,62 ± 3,91). A significant improvement was found in both groups for all outcomes at 6 months and at final follow up. PSM yielded 29 pairs. Patients treated with MOWHTO showed superior TAS scores at 6 months (3,41 ± 0,50 vs 3,10 ± 0,56; p < 0,05) and at final follow up (3,83 ± 0,80 vs 3,27 ± 0,59; p < 0,005). NRS and LKS were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MOWHTO performed using an open wedge technique, with locking plate and a fast rehabilitation protocol guaranteed higher level of activity than UKA in patients older than 50 years. Difference is significant already at 6 months and last longer than 4 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Can treatment of posterior malleolus fractures with tibio-fibular instability be usefully addressed by Bartonicek classification?

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures account for 4% of all fractures and treatment of those involving the Posterior Malleolus remains controversial. Clinical and radiological outcomes in a cohort of patients with Posterior Malleolus fractures conservatively treated were retrospectively evaluated; furthermore, a treatment algorithm was suggested. METHODS: Patients were divided according to Bartonícek classification. The clinical evaluation was made with OMAS/AOFAS scores; the radiological evaluation with Van Dijk classification for post-traumatic arthritis. RESULTS: Clinical outcome worsened with the severity of Bartonícek classification, but early degenerative changes were not correlated neither to the clinical outcome nor to the injury pattern. Clinical and radiological outcomes depended on the damage of the syndesmosis as articular step-offs and tibio-fibular notch involvement. DISCUSSION: We recommend conservative treatment for Bartonícek type I, type II and type III fractures, the latter when undisplaced and without tibial plafond depression. We suggest surgical treatment for type IV and displaced type III fractures.