Vitamin D supplementation and calcium absorption during caloric restriction: a randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss (WL) is associated with a decrease in calcium absorption and may be one mechanism that induces bone loss with weight reduction. OBJECTIVE: Because vitamin D supplementation has been shown to increase true fractional calcium absorption (TFCA), the goal of this study was to examine the effect of vitamin D during WL or weight maintenance (WM). DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 6-wk study was conducted in 82 postmenopausal women [BMI (in kg/m(2); ±SD): 30.2 ± 3.7] with 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations <70 nmol/L during either WL or WM. All women were given 10 µg vitamin D(3)/d and 1.2 g Ca/d and either weekly vitamin D(3) (375 µg) or a placebo equivalent to 63 µg (2500 IU)/d and 10 µg (400 IU)/d, respectively. We measured TFCA with the use of dual-stable isotopes, 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone, estradiol, calcitriol, and urinary calcium at baseline and 6 wk in weight loss and vitamin D(3)-supplementation (WL-D; n = 19), weight maintenance and vitamin D(3)-supplementation (WM-D; n = 20), weight loss and placebo (n = 22), and weight maintenance and placebo (n = 21) groups. RESULTS: WL groups lost 3.8 ± 1.1% of weight with no difference between vitamin D(3) supplementation and the placebo. The rise in serum 25(OH)D was greatest in the WL-D group (19.8 ± 14.5 nmol/L) compared with in WM-D (9.1 ± 10.3 nmol/L) and placebo groups (1.5 ± 10.9 nmol/L). TFCA increased with vitamin D(3) supplementation compared with placebo treatment (P < 0.01) and decreased during WL compared with WM. Serum 25(OH)D or 1,25-dihyroxyvitamin D did not correlate with TFCA. CONCLUSION: These data show that vitamin D supplementation increases TFCA and that WL decreases TFCA and suggest that, when calcium intake is 1.2 g/d, either 10 or 63 µg vitamin D/d is sufficient to maintain the calcium balance. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00473031.

Areal and volumetric bone mineral density and geometry at two levels of protein intake during caloric restriction: a randomized, controlled trial.

Weight reduction induces bone loss by several factors, and the effect of higher protein (HP) intake during caloric restriction on bone mineral density (BMD) is not known. Previous study designs examining the longer-term effects of HP diets have not controlled for total calcium intake between groups and have not examined the relationship between bone and endocrine changes. In this randomized, controlled study, we examined how BMD (areal and volumetric), turnover markers, and hormones [insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and estradiol] respond to caloric restriction during a 1-year trial using two levels of protein intake. Forty-seven postmenopausal women (58.0 ± 4.4 years; body mass index of 32.1 ± 4.6 kg/m(2) ) completed the 1-year weight-loss trial and were on a higher (HP, 24%, n = 26) or normal protein (NP, 18%, n = 21) and fat intake (28%) with controlled calcium intake of 1.2 g/d. After 1 year, subjects lost 7.0% ± 4.5% of body weight, and protein intake was 86 and 60 g/d in the HP and NP groups, respectively. HP compared with NP diet attenuated loss of BMD at the ultradistal radius, lumbar spine, and total hip and trabecular volumetric BMD and bone mineral content of the tibia. This is consistent with the higher final values of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 and lower bone-resorption marker (deoxypyridinoline) in the HP group than in the NP group (p < .05). These data show that a higher dietary protein during weight reduction increases serum IGF-1 and attenuates total and trabecular bone loss at certain sites in postmenopausal women.

Energy restriction is associated with lower bone mineral density of the tibia and femur in lean but not obese female rats.

Energy restriction decreases bone mineral density (BMD), and epidemiological studies suggest that the risk of weight loss-induced bone loss is greater in lean than in heavier individuals. Our goal in this study was to determine how bone density and geometry respond to energy restriction in mature obese rats compared with lean rats. At 6 mo of age, 36 diet-induced obese and lean female Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to control (CTL; ad libitum; n = 18) and energy-restricted (EnR; 40% restriction; n = 18) diets. After 10 wk of dietary intervention, obese EnR rats lost more weight (-91 +/- 34 g) than lean EnR rats(-61 +/- 14 g) (P < 0.02), [corrected] whereas body weight did not change significantly in the 2 CTL groups (14 +/- 23 g). Only the lean EnR (and not obese EnR) rats showed lower BMD compared with CTL rats at the tibia, distal, and proximal femur and femoral neck, and trabecular bone volume (P < 0.05). Serum estradiol declined in lean EnR rats compared with baseline (P < 0.05) but not in the obese EnR rats. In addition, the final serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration was higher (P < 0.05) in obese than in lean EnR rats. Serum parathyroid hormone decreased (P < 0.05) from baseline to final in lean and obese CTL, but not EnR rats. These data support the hypothesis that energy restriction in lean rats compared with obese rats is more detrimental to bone, and it is possible that the greater decline in estrogen and lower levels of 25OHD contribute to this effect.

Blood lead levels and bone turnover with weight reduction in women.

High bone turnover states are known to raise blood lead levels (BPb). Caloric restriction will increase bone turnover, yet it remains unknown if weight reduction increases BPb due to mobilization of skeletal stores. We measured whole blood Pb levels ((206)Pb) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in 73 women (age 24-75 years; BMI 23- 61 kg/m(2)) before and after 6 months of severe weight loss (S-WL), moderate weight loss (M-WL), or weight maintenance (WM). Baseline BPb levels were relatively low at 0.2-6.0 microg/dl, and directly associated with age (r=0.49, P<0.0001). After severe WL (-37.4+/-9.3 kg, n=17), BPb increased by 2.1+/-3.9 microg/dl (P<0.05), resulting in BPb levels of 1.3-12.5 microg/dl. M-WL (-5.6+/-2.7 kg, n=39) and WM (0.3+/-1.3 kg, n=17) did not result in an increase in BPb levels (0.5+/-3.2 and 0.0+/-0.7 microg/dl, M-WL and WM, respectively). BPb levels increased more with greater WL (r=0.24, P<0.05). Bone turnover markers increased only with severe WL and were directly correlated with WL. At baseline, higher calcium intake was associated with lower BPb (r=-0.273, P<0.02), however, this association was no longer present after 6 months. Severe weight reduction in obese women increases skeletal bone mobilization and BPb, but values remain well below levels defined as Pb overexposure.

Bone mineral density and content during weight cycling in female rats: effects of dietary amylase-resistant starch.

BACKGROUND: Although there is considerable evidence for a loss of bone mass with weight loss, the few human studies on the relationship between weight cycling and bone mass or density have differing results. Further, very few studies assessed the role of dietary composition on bone mass during weight cycling. The primary objective of this study was to determine if a diet high in amylase-resistant starch (RS2), which has been shown to increase absorption and balance of dietary minerals, can prevent or reduce loss of bone mass during weight cycling. METHODS: Female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (n = 84, age = 20 weeks) were randomly assigned to one of 6 treatment groups with 14 rats per group using a 2 x 3 experimental design with 2 diets and 3 weight cycling protocols. Rats were fed calcium-deficient diets without RS2 (controls) or diets high in RS2 (18% by weight) throughout the 21-week study. The weight cycling protocols were weight maintenance/gain with no weight cycling, 1 round of weight cycling, or 2 rounds of weight cycling. After the rats were euthanized bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of femur were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and concentrations of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, and zinc in femur and lumbar vertebrae were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. RESULTS: Rats undergoing weight cycling had lower femur BMC (p < 0.05) and marginally lower BMD (p = 0.09) than rats not undergoing weight cycling. In comparison to controls, rats fed RS2 had higher femur BMD (p < 0.01) and BMC (p < 0.05), as well as higher values for BMD and BMC measured at the distal end (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) and femoral neck (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Consistent with these findings, RS2-fed rats also had higher femur calcium (p < 0.05) and magnesium (p < 0.0001) concentrations. They also had higher lumbar vertebrae calcium (p < 0.05) and magnesium (p < 0.05) concentrations. CONCLUSION: Weight cycling reduces bone mass. A diet high in RS2 can minimize loss of bone mass during weight cycling and may increase bone mass in the absence of weight cycling.

Effects of formalin fixation and collagen cross-linking on T2 and magnetization transfer in bovine nasal cartilage.

Endogenous collagen cross-links influence cartilage biomechanical properties and resistance to degradation. Formalin fixation modifies collagen residues and forms new cross-links in a dose-dependent manner. We tested the hypothesis that magnetization transfer (MT) effects and T(2) depend on collagen cross-linking in cartilage. These parameters were measured in bovine nasal cartilage (BNC) prior to fixation, after 9 weeks of immersion in formalin solutions ranging in concentration from 0% to 10%, and after NaBH(3)CN reduction and washing. T(2) decreased by 59.4% +/- 1.1% upon fixation in 10% formalin, and was 32.2% +/- 5.2% shorter than initial values after washing. The apparent MT rate increased 25.9% +/- 3.7% and 52.8% +/- 7.1% over baseline under these conditions. Biochemical assays showed no significant differences in water, proteoglycan, natural cross-link, or collagen content between the 0% and 10% formalin-treated samples, while amino acid analysis demonstrated losses in (hydroxy)lysine and tyrosine, and new peaks consistent with methylene cross-links in fixed samples only. We conclude that formalin fixation of cartilage results in significant decreases in T(2) and increases in MT parameters that persist after removal of unreacted formaldehyde. The collagen cross-links thus created are associated with large changes in MT and T(2), indicating that interpretation of T(2) and MT values in terms of cartilage macromolecular content must be made with caution.

Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss is associated with bone loss, but this has not been examined in overweight premenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether overweight premenopausal women lose bone with moderate weight loss at recommended or higher than recommended calcium intakes. DESIGN: Overweight premenopausal women [n = 44; x (+/-SD) age: 38 +/- 6.4 y; body mass index (BMI): 27.7 +/- 2.1 kg/m(2)] were randomly assigned to either a normal (1 g/d) or high (1.8 g/d) calcium intake during 6 mo of energy restriction [weight loss (WL) groups] or were recruited for weight maintenance at 1 g Ca/d intake. Regional bone mineral density and content were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and markers of bone turnover were measured before and after weight loss. True fractional calcium absorption (TFCA) was measured at baseline and during caloric restriction by using a dual-stable calcium isotope method. RESULTS: The WL groups lost 7.2 +/- 3.3% of initial body weight. No significant decrease in BMD or rise in bone turnover was observed with weight loss at normal or high calcium intake. The group that consumed high calcium showed a strong relation (r = 0.71) between increased femoral neck bone mineral density and increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. No significant effect of weight loss on TFCA was observed, and the total calcium absorbed was adequate at 238 +/- 81 and 310 +/- 91 mg/d for the normal- and high-calcium WL groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overweight premenopausal women do not lose bone during weight loss at the recommended calcium intake, which may be explained by sufficient amounts of absorbed calcium.