Reducing calcineurin inhibitor first for treating BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation: long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Reducing immunosuppression is the mainstay of treating BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viraemia after kidney transplantation, but the best approach, efficacy and impact are undefined. We established a standard operating procedure (SOP) treating BKPyV viraemia based on first reducing calcineurin inhibitor ('CNI first'). The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes in 644 consecutive transplantations using this SOP. METHODS: Patients were monitored for active BKPyV infection by urinary decoy cells and, if positive, by BKPyV viraemia. In case of sustained BKPyV viraemia >1000 copies/mL, immunosuppression was reduced stepwise according to the SOP. Patients were classified as 'no decoy cells' [n = 432 (66%)], 'decoy cells/no viraemia' [n = 107 (17%)] and 'viraemia' [n = 105 (17%)]. RESULTS: At 6-years post-transplant, graft survival was ∼84%, the clinical rejection rate was ∼25% and they were not different among the three groups (P = 0.14; P = 0.91). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at the last follow-up was similar (range 49-53 mL/min, P = 0.08). Of 105 viraemic patients, 101 (96%) cleared BKPyV viraemia. In 39% of patients, viraemia clearance followed a tacrolimus reduction. A reduction of mycophenolic acid was required in 43% and discontinuation in 3%. No short-term graft loss was directly attributable to BKPyV-associated nephropathy. After a median follow-up of 5 years after clearance of BKPyV viraemia, 11/101 patients (11%) developed clinical rejection: 7 (7%) T-cell-mediated rejection and 4 (4%) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression reduction based on 'CNI first' leads to similar long-term outcomes in patients with/without BKPyV viraemia and is associated with a low risk for ABMR after clearance of BKPyV viraemia. Randomized trials are needed to compare the risks and benefits of immunosuppression reduction strategies in kidney transplant patients with BKPyV viraemia.

Pharmacokinetics of oxycodone/naloxone and its metabolites in patients with end-stage renal disease during and between haemodialysis sessions.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of oxycodone in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged release and their metabolites in patients with ESRD during and between haemodialysis sessions. METHODS: Single doses of oxycodone/naloxone (5/2.5 or 10/5 mg) were administered in nine patients with ESRD using a cross-over design on the day of dialysis and on a day between dialysis sessions. Plasma, dialysate and urine concentrations of oxycodone, naloxone and their metabolites were determined up to 48 h post-dosing using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system. RESULTS: Haemodialysis performed 6-10 h after dosing removed ∼10% of the administered dose of oxycodone predominantly as unconjugated oxycodone and noroxycodone or conjugated oxymorphone and noroxymorphone. The haemodialysis clearance of oxycodone based on its recovery in dialysate was (mean ± SD) 8.4 ± 2.1 L/h. The geometric mean (coefficient of variation) plasma elimination half-life of oxycodone during the 4-h haemodialysis period was 3.9 h (39%) which was significantly shorter than the 5.7 h (22%) without haemodialysis. Plasma levels of the active metabolite oxymorphone in its unconjugated form were very low. CONCLUSIONS: Oxycodone is removed during haemodialysis. The pharmacokinetics including the relatively short half-life of oxycodone in patients with ESRD with or without haemodialysis and the absence of unconjugated active metabolites indicate that oxycodone can be used at usual doses in patients requiring dialysis.