Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health ; 196: 135-137, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34198072

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A strong COVID-19 vaccine campaign is needed to reach the herd immunity and reduce this pandemic infection. STUDY DESIGN: In the Foch Hospital, France, in February 2021, 451 healthcare workers were vaccinated by a first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine. METHODS: Adverse effects were reported to our pharmaco-vigilance circuit, by an online and anonymous questionnaire following the first weeks of the vaccinal campaign to healthcare workers. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four (60.8%) of them reported multiple adverse effects. Main adverse effects reported were feverish state/chills (65.7%), fatigue/physical discomfort (62.4%), arthralgia/muscle pain (61.0%) and fever (44.5%). CONCLUSIONS: On March 2021 many European countries suspended AstraZeneca vaccine for one week due to safety uncertainty. Thus, confidence in its efficacy is undermined. However, the benefit/risk balance is clearly in favor of vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
2.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(4): 361-367, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375373

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To conduct an audit of vaccination practices against pertussis in maternity wards to assess immunization practices targeting women, knowledge and awareness among health professionals and their involvement in the vaccination process, and to estimate their vaccine coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2017 cross-sectional descriptive survey using a data collection sheet of immunization practices targeting women and an anonymous questionnaire for health professionals whose vaccine coverage had been documented by the occupational health service. RESULTS: Five public maternity wards participated: one had a vaccination policy for women; 426 of 822 health professionals completed the questionnaire, 76% (from 50% of all residents to 83% of nurses) declared their vaccination status as up to date. Staff files in occupational health services showed that 69% of 822 health professionals received at least one vaccine booster during adulthood (57% less than 10 years before the survey); documented vaccination coverage rates ranged from 75% for residents to 91% for senior physicians. Occupational physicians and family physicians respectively performed 41% and 34% of vaccinations. While knowledge regarding vaccines was good, only 47% of health professionals declared prescribing them and 18% declared administering the anti-pertussis vaccine "often" or "very often". CONCLUSIONS: Updated data is needed to confirm the reported increase as participating centers are not representative of all birth centers. The active role of health professionals in vaccination-based pertussis prevention needs to be reinforced.


Assuntos
Maternidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Coqueluche , Gravidez , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/psicologia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tocologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/psicologia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina do Trabalho , Paris/epidemiologia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA