Progression of a series of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated for 7 years with natalizumab using the "no evidence of disease activity" parameter.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. However, due to the limitations of these trials, it is important to know how the condition behaves under long-term clinical practice conditions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with RRMS by means of annual evaluation of the "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) parameter, which includes number of relapses, disability (measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale), and brain MRI parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with RRMS from 3 centres who were treated with one or more doses of natalizumab. Each year, we evaluated NEDA status and safety based on the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment with natalizumab and experienced adverse reactions. RESULTS: The study included 89 patients, most of whom received treatment for 2 to 4 years, with a follow-up period of up to 7 years. Natalizumab significantly reduces the radiological and clinical progression of the disease, as well as the annual rate of relapses. The NEDA parameter demonstrates the effectiveness of the drug, with values of 75.28% for year one and 66.67% for year 7. Twenty-five patients (28.1%) dropped out after a median of 4 years. Fourteen of these patients (56%) dropped out due to the appearance of anti-JC virus antibodies, either in isolation or associated with another cause. Four dropouts (16%) were due to treatment ineffectiveness, with one patient dying due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab is highly effective as measured by the NEDA long-term remission parameter.

Evolución de una serie de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente tratados con natalizumab durante 7 años mediante el parámetro no evidencia enfermedad activa / Progression of a series of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated for 7 years with natalizumab using the “no evidence of disease activity” parameter

Introducción: La efectividad y seguridad de natalizumab en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente recurrente (EMRR) se demostró en ensayos clínicos. Sin embargo, por las limitaciones de estos es importante saber cómo se comporta en condiciones de práctica clínica a largo plazo.ObjetivoConocer la eficacia a largo plazo de natalizumab en pacientes con EMRR mediante la evaluación anual del no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), que incluye número de brotes, discapacidad medida con EDSS y parámetros de RM cerebral.Pacientes y métodosEstudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico (n = 3) de pacientes con EMRR tratados con una o más dosis de natalizumab. Se evaluó el estado NEDA cada año y la seguridad a partir del porcentaje de pacientes que discontinuaron y que presentaron efectos adversos.ResultadosIncluimos 89 pacientes, la mayoría recibieron tratamiento durante 2 a 4 años, con una duración del seguimiento de hasta 7 años. Natalizumab reduce significativamente la progresión radiológica y clínica de la enfermedad, así como la tasa anual de brotes, demostrándose su eficacia con el parámetro NEDA, 75,28% al primer año y 66,67% al séptimo año. Veinticinco pacientes (28,1%) han abandonado el estudio en una mediana de tiempo de 4 años, 14 pacientes (56%) por aparición de anticuerpos contra el virus JC, como causa única o asociada a otro motivo, 4 abandonos (16%) fueron por ineficacia, un paciente falleció a causa de LMP.ConclusionesNatalizumab presenta una alta eficacia medida mediante el parámetro de remisión NEDA a largo plazo. (AU)

Introduction: The safety and effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. However, due to the limitations of these trials, it is important to know how the condition behaves under long-term clinical practice conditions.ObjectiveTo determine the long-term effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with RRMS by means of annual evaluation of the “no evidence of disease activity” (NEDA) parameter, which includes number of relapses, disability (measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale), and brain MRI parameters.Patients and methodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients with RRMS from 3 centres who were treated with one or more doses of natalizumab. Each year, we evaluated NEDA status and safety based on the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment with natalizumab and experienced adverse reactions.ResultsThe study included 89 patients, most of whom received treatment for 2 to 4 years, with a follow-up period of up to 7 years. Natalizumab significantly reduces the radiological and clinical progression of the disease, as well as the annual rate of relapses. The NEDA parameter demonstrates the effectiveness of the drug, with values of 75.28% for year one and 66.67% for year 7. Twenty-five patients (28.1%) dropped out after a median of 4 years. Fourteen of these patients (56%) dropped out due to the appearance of anti–JC virus antibodies, either in isolation or associated with another cause. Four dropouts (16%) were due to treatment ineffectiveness, with one patient dying due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.ConclusionsNatalizumab is highly effective as measured by the NEDA long-term remission parameter. (AU)

[Fingolimod: effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. An observational, retrospective, multi-centre study in Galicia]. / Fingolimod: efectividad y seguridad en la practica clinica habitual. Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y multicentrico en Galicia.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been proven in clinical trials. Yet, due to their limitations, it is important to know how it behaves under everyday clinical practice conditions. Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod after 12 months' usage in clinical practice in Galicia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multi-centre study (n = 8) of patients with RRMS who were treated with one or more doses of fingolimod, 0.5 mg/day. Effectiveness was assessed -annualised relapse rate (ARR), changes in the score on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), percentage of patients free from relapses, free from progression of disability and free from activity in resonance- for the total number of patients and according to previous treatment. Safety was assessed based on the percentage of patients who withdrew and presented adverse side effects. RESULTS: After 12 months' use, fingolimod reduced the ARR by 87% (1.7 to 0.23; p < 0.0001) and, consequently, 81% of patients were free from relapses. The score was reduced by 9%. In all, 91% of patients were free from progression of disability and 72% were free from resonance activity. No signs of disease activity were found in 43% of the patients. Most of the benefits of fingolimod differed depending on previous treatment. About a third of the patients reported adverse side effects, but only 2% of them withdrew for this reason. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, most of the results on the effectiveness of the clinical trials conducted with fingolimod were observed during the first 12 months of treatment. A better safety profile was observed than that reported in the clinical trials.

TITLE: Fingolimod: efectividad y seguridad en la practica clinica habitual. Estudio observacional, retrospectivo y multicentrico en Galicia.Introduccion. La efectividad y seguridad del fingolimod en pacientes con esclerosis multiple remitente recurrente (EMRR) se demostro en ensayos clinicos. Sin embargo, por las limitaciones de estos, es importante saber como se comporta en condiciones de practica clinica habitual. Asi, el objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la efectividad y seguridad del fingolimod despues de 12 meses de uso en la practica clinica en Galicia. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio retrospectivo y multicentrico (n = 8) de pacientes con EMRR y tratados con una o mas dosis de fingolimod, 0,5 mg/dia. Se evaluo la efectividad ­tasa anualizada de brotes (TAB), cambio en la puntuacion de la escala expandida del estado de discapacidad (EDSS), porcentaje de pacientes libres de brotes, libres de progresion de discapacidad y libres de actividad en resonancia­ para el total de pacientes y segun tratamiento previo. Se evaluo la seguridad a partir del porcentaje de pacientes que discontinuaron y que presentaron efectos adversos. Resultados. Despues de 12 meses de uso, el fingolimod redujo un 87% la TAB (de 1,7 a 0,23; p < 0,0001) y, en consecuencia, un 81% de pacientes estuvo libre de brotes. La puntuacion de la EDSS disminuyo un 9%. Un 91% de pacientes estuvo libre de progresion de discapacidad y un 72%, libre de actividad en resonancia. En el 43% de los pacientes no se evidenciaron signos de la actividad de la enfermedad. La mayoria de los beneficios del fingolimod difirieron segun el tratamiento previo. Alrededor de un tercio de los pacientes comunicaron efectos adversos, pero solo el 2% discontinuo debido a ellos. Conclusiones. La mayoria de los resultados de efectividad de los ensayos clinicos del fingolimod se observa durante los 12 primeros meses de tratamiento en la practica clinica. Se observo un mejor perfil de seguridad al comunicado en los ensayos clinicos.

[Time evolution of TNF-alpha, VCAM-1, IL-4, IL-10, neopterin and CD-30 in patients treated with interferon]. / Evolución temporal de TNF-a, VCAM-1, IL-4, IL-10, neopterina y CD-30 en pacientes tratados con interferón.

INTRODUCTION: Interferon (IFN) diminishes the outbreaks of multiple sclerosis (MS) and slows down its progression. Follow-up of patients is performed using clinical and resonance imaging parameters, and no biological markers are available that allow us to determine its efficiency. AIMS: 1. To discover the effects of IFN on the serum levels of TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-10, VCAM-1, neopterin and CD-30 in patients with MS; 2. To determine how these modifications evolve over time; 3. To find out the clinical value of its determination in isolation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 19 patients with MS who were clinically stable and undergoing IFN therapy. Samples were obtained every 3 months over a 2.5 year period and always immediately before injecting the drug. The ELISA method was used to determine interleukins. RESULTS: Serum levels of neopterin, CD-30 and VCAM-1 were not modified, TNF-alpha levels oscillated regardless of the clinical status of the patient and IL-4 and IL-10 had a significant serum peak at 9-12 months after beginning treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of a significant IL-4 and IL-10 peak between 6 and 12 months of therapy indicates that IFN reaches its possible immunomodulatory effect after several months and, therefore, a poor initial clinical response must not be a reason for discontinuing medication. The specific determination of the serum levels of IL is not useful in following up patients treated with IFN.

[Experience in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta in Galicia]. / Experiencia del tratamiento con interferón beta en la esclerosis múltiple en Galicia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the experience in daily clinical practice of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) treatment in relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS) in Galicia (Spain). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RR-MS and SP-MS treated with IFN-beta1a and 1b between 1995 and December/2000, analyzing demographic and clinical data. RESULTS: 313 patients were included, with a mean age of 38.2 years. A total of 296 patients (94.6%) were clinically defined MS and 17 (5.4%) were laboratory supported (Poser criteria); 84.6% of the patients were RR and 15.4% were SP. The mean duration of the disease prior to treatment was 7.06 years. Betaferon was used in 52.4% patients (115 RR-MS and 47 SP-MS), Avonex in 26% and Rebif in 21.6%. Relapse rate was reduced in 68.8% for the RR-MS for Betaferon-treated patients, 73.3% for Avonex treated and 35.7% for Rebif-treated patients. Betaferon reduced relapse rate in 50% for SP-MS. The global EDSS remained stable during IFN-beta treatment. During treatment, 33% of Betaferon, 60.5% of Avonex and 54.5% of Rebif-treated patients remained relapse-free. Treatment was suspended in 12.9% of Betaferon, 6.2% of Avonex, and 3% Rebif-treated patients. The most frequent causes of treatment suspension were increase in disability and in relapse count. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the benefits of IFN-beta treatment in RR MS and SP MS in daily clinical practice, with reduction in relapses count and incapacity, good over-all tolerance and low incidence of serious adverse side-effects.

[Hematogenous meningitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus with sacro-iliitis and multiple abscesses. An infrequent association]. / Meningitis hematogéna por Staphylococcus aureus con sacroileítis y abscesos múltiples. Una asociación infrecuente.

INTRODUCTION: Meningitis due to Staphylococcus aureus (MSA) is an uncommon infectious condition. It forms from 1-9% of all cases of bacterial meningitis, and is characterized by a high morbidity and mortality. Ever since the first publications dealing with this type of meningitis, two basic mechanism have been described for the development of this infection: post-neurosurgical and hematogenous, also known as spontaneous. CLINICAL CASE: Our objective is to present the case of a 65 year old woman who developed hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus meningitis, without any predisposing factors. During clinical investigation, the meningeal infection was seen to be associated with septic arthritis of the right sacro-iliac joint (shown on isotope studies) and with retro-peritoneal and gluteal abscesses (shown on computerized tomography). In this patient the pathological findings were: MSA, retroperitoneal and gluteal abscesses, and unilateral sacro-ileitis. To date such a combination has not been described (Medline search from January 1982 up to june 1996). CONCLUSIONS: After analysis of the pathogenic findings of the MSA directly involved in this case we conclude by emphasizing the following points: 1. It is very important to make a thorough search for a primary infectious focus responsible for MSA, completing the physical examination of the patient with imaging techniques (conventional radiology, CT, isotope studies, etc.). 2. Depending on the primary focus found in an MSA, antibiotic treatment may sometimes have to be complemented by other methods of treatment to avoid subsequent complications.