Bladder Repair With Irrigation and Debridement and Open Reduction Internal Fixation of the Anterior Pelvic Ring Is Safe and Decreases Risk of Infection in Pelvic Ring Injuries With Extraperitoneal Bladder Ruptures.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of infection in nonoperative versus operative management of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures in patients with pelvic ring injuries. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of 2 prospectively collected trauma registries. SETTING: Two Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 (6%) had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was the incidence and associated risk factors of deep pelvic infection requiring return to OR for surgical debridement. Secondary outcomes included quality of reduction, other complications, and radiographic union. Comparisons were made based on the status of any associated bladder injury. RESULTS: Of 1127 patients with operative pelvic ring injuries, 68 patients had extraperitoneal bladder ruptures, 55 had bladder repair and 13 did not. Of those 13 without repair, none had ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring. Patients without bladder repair had an increased odds of infection 17-fold compared to patients who did have a repair performed (OR 16.9, 95% CI 1.75 - 164, P = 0.01). Other associated factors for deep pelvic infection included use of suprapubic catheter ( p < 0.02) and a closed reduction of the anterior ring ( p < 0.01). Patients undergoing anterior ring ORIF and bladder repair had improved reductions and no increased infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: Operative repair of extraperitoneal bladder ruptures decreases risk of infection in patients with pelvic ring injuries. Additionally, ORIF of the anterior pelvic ring does not increase the risk of infection and results in better reductions compared to closed reduction. Treatment algorithms for these combined injuries should consider recommending early bladder repair and anterior pelvic ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous sacral screw fixation alone sufficient for mildly displaced U-type sacral fractures with preserved osseous fixation pathways.

PURPOSE: To describe U-type sacral fracture characteristics amenable to percutaneous sacral screw fixation. METHODS: U-type sacral fractures were identified from a trauma registry at a level 1 trauma center from 2014 to 2020. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, and fixation construct were retrospectively retrieved. Associations between fracture pattern and surgical fixation were identified. RESULTS: 82 U-type sacral fractures were reviewed. Six treated with lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) and 76 were treated with percutaneous sacral screws (PSS) alone. Patients receiving LBF had greater sacral fracture displacement in coronal, sagittal, and axial planes compared to patients receiving PSS alone (P < 0.05), negating osseous fixation pathways. All patients went onto sacral union and there were no implant failures or unplanned reoperations for either group. CONCLUSION: If osseous fixation pathways are present, U-type sacral fractures can be successfully treated with percutaneous sacral screws. LPF may be indicated in more displaced fractures with loss of spinopelvic alignment. Both techniques for U-type sacral fractures result in reliable fixation and healing without reoperations.

Does operative treatment of geriatric pelvic ring injuries lead to a high risk of one-year mortality?

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative management of pelvic ring injuries in the elderly is associated with a high risk of one-year mortality. The majority of these injuries are the result of a low-energy mechanism, however, due to the multiple medical comorbidities in this patient population the injuries are associated with a high degree of morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine the one-year mortality risk after operative treatment of pelvic ring injuries in a geriatric patient population and the effect of patient and injury characteristics on the risk of mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients over the age of 70 who underwent operative fixation of a pelvic ring injury at two Level 1 trauma centers between January 2016 and June 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient and injury characteristics including: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score or Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). The primary outcome of interest was the one-year mortality risk following operative treatment. Secondary outcomes included the effect of patient and injury characteristics on the one-year mortality risk and the hospital LOS. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included with an average age of 79.8  ±  6.5 years. The overall mortality was 8.9% (n = 8) and was significantly associated with the CCI. There was no significant effect related to the ASA physical status score or ISS. The average hospital LOS was 9.2 ± 7.3 days and was associated with the CCI, ASA physical status score, and ISS. DISCUSSION: Non-operative management of pelvic ring injuries in geriatric patients is associated with a high risk of one-year mortality. Our findings suggest operative treatment of these fractures is associated with an acceptable risk of one-year mortality that falls below the commonly reported range for non-operatively managed injuries. Furthermore, the risk of mortality was significantly associated with the patient's pre-injury state as determined by the CCI.

Multiple Ligament Knee Injuries: Does the Knee Dislocation Classification Predict the Type of Surgical Management?

This study aims to evaluate relationships among multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI) patterns as classified according to the knee dislocation (KD) classification and the types of surgical management pursued. We hypothesized that the KD classification would not be predictive of the types of surgical management, and that categorizing injuries according to additional injury features such as structure, chronicity, grade, and topographic location would be predictive of the types of surgical management. This is a Retrospective cohort study. This study was conducted at a level I trauma center with a 150-mile coverage radius. Query of our billing database was performed using combinations of 43 billing codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD] 9, ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology) to identify patients from 2011 to 2015 who underwent operative management for MLKIs. There were operative or nonoperative treatment for individual ligamentous injuries, repair, or reconstruction of individual ligamentous injuries, and staging or nonstaging or nonstaging of each surgical procedure. The main outcome was the nature and timing of clinical management for specific ligamentous injury patterns. In total, 287 patients were included in this study; there were 199 males (69.3%), the mean age was 30.2 years (SD: 14.0), and the mean BMI was 28.8 kg/m2 (SD: 7.4). There were 212 injuries (73.9%) categorized as either KD-I or KD-V. The KD classification alone was not predictive of surgery timing, staging, or any type of intervention for any injured ligament (p > 0.05). Recategorization of injury patterns according to structure, chronicity, grade, and location revealed the following: partial non-ACL injuries were more frequently repaired primarily (p < 0.001), distal medial-sided injuries were more frequently treated operatively than proximal medial-sided injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 24.7; p <0.0001), and staging was more frequent for combined PCL-lateral injuries (OR = 1.3; p = 0.003) and nonavulsive fractures (OR = 1.2; p = 0.0009). The KD classification in isolation was not predictive of any surgical management strategy. Surgical management was predictable when specifying the grade and topographic location of each ligamentous injury. This is a Level IV, retrospective cohort study.