Modified Frailty Index Associates With Transoral Robotic Surgery Complications and Survival: A National Database Study.

OBJECTIVE: The modified frailty index (mFI-5) is a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-derived 5-factor index that has been proven to reflect frailty and predict morbidity and mortality. We hypothesize that mFI-5 is a valid predictive measure in the transoral robotic surgery (TORS) population. METHODS: Retrospective study utilizing the TriNetX US-collaborative health records network querying for TORS patients. Cohorts were stratified by mFI-5 score which uses five ICD-10 codes: nonindependent functional status, hypertension, obstructive respiratory disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Cohorts were matched by age using propensity score matching. Outcome measures included survival, infection, pneumonia, tracheostomy dependence, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy dependence. Reported odds ratios were normalized to mFI-5 = 0. RESULTS: A total of 9,081 patients were included in the final analysis. Greater mFI-5 scores predicted decreased survival and increased incidence of postoperative infection and pneumonia. Odds of 5-year mortality were 1.93 (p = 0.0003) for mFI-5 = 2 and 1.90 (p = 0.0002) for mFI-5 = 3. Odds of 2-year mortality were 1.25 (p = 0.0125) for mFI-5 = 1, 1.58 (p = 0.0002) for mFI-5 = 2, and 1.87 (p = 0.003) for mFI-5 = 3. Odds of postoperative infection were 1.51 (p = 0.02) for mFI-5 = 2 and 1.78 (p = 0.05) for mFI-5 = 3. Two-year odds of developing pneumonia were 1.69 (p = 0.0001) for mFI-5 = 2 and 2.84 (p < 0.0001) for mFI-5 = 3. Two-month odds of pneumonia were 1.50 (p = 0.0259) for mFI-5 = 2 and 2.55 (p = 0.0037) for mFI-5 = 3. mFI-5 = 4 or 5 had too few patients to analyze. Using polynomial regression to model age versus incident 5-year post-TORS death (R2 = 0.99), mFI-5 scores better predicted survival than age alone. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that mFI-5 predicts mortality, pneumonia, and postoperative infection independently of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Complications and Functional Outcomes After Esophageal Reconstruction with an Intact Larynx.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal defects can result from primary pathologies such as malignancy or stricture, or secondary ones such as perforation due to trauma or iatrogenic injury. Techniques, management, and outcomes of reconstruction in this setting are poorly understood. Herein, we aim to highlight surgical outcomes in patients undergoing local and free flap reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction with an intact larynx between 2009 and 2022 at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Esophageal reconstruction was performed for extruded spinal hardware (n = 8), and esophageal stricture (n = 2). Four patients underwent reconstruction with free tissue transfer, and six with local pedicled flaps. There were no cases of flap failure, esophageal fistula, hematoma, or wound dehiscence. One patient had post-operative bleeding requiring return to the operating room. Three patients had a postoperative wound infection, two of whom required washout. There were no unplanned 30-day readmissions. At three months after operation, all patients who were not tube feed-dependent prior to surgery returned to oral intake. Of the four patients who were tube feed-dependent preoperatively, three were tolerating oral intake at nine months postoperatively. Nine patients (90%) had stable flexible laryngoscopy exams pre- and postoperatively with no voice changes. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx can be challenging. In this series, surgical intervention with free tissue transfer and local pedicled flaps was effective in returning patients to oral intake with low long-term morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1227-1233, 2024.

Evaluating ChatGPT Responses on Thyroid Nodules for Patient Education.

Background: ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, is the fastest growing consumer application in history. Given recent trends identifying increasing patient use of Internet sources for self-education, we seek to evaluate the quality of ChatGPT-generated responses for patient education on thyroid nodules. Methods: ChatGPT was queried 4 times with 30 identical questions. Queries differed by initial chatbot prompting: no prompting, patient-friendly prompting, 8th-grade level prompting, and prompting for references. Answers were scored on a hierarchical score: incorrect, partially correct, correct, or correct with references. Proportions of responses at incremental score thresholds were compared by prompt type using chi-squared analysis. Flesch-Kincaid grade level was calculated for each answer. The relationship between prompt type and grade level was assessed using analysis of variance. References provided within ChatGPT answers were totaled and analyzed for veracity. Results: Across all prompts (n = 120 questions), 83 answers (69.2%) were at least correct. Proportions of responses that were at least partially correct (p = 0.795) and correct (p = 0.402) did not differ by prompt; responses that were correct with references did (p < 0.0001). Responses from 8th-grade level prompting were the lowest mean grade level (13.43 ± 2.86) and were significantly lower than no prompting (14.97 ± 2.01, p = 0.01) and prompting for references (16.43 ± 2.05, p < 0.0001). Prompting for references generated 80/80 (100%) of referenced medical publications within answers. Seventy references (87.5%) were legitimate citations, and 58/80 (72.5%) provided accurately reported information from the referenced publication. Conclusion: ChatGPT overall provides appropriate answers to most questions on thyroid nodules regardless of prompting. Despite targeted prompting strategies, ChatGPT reliably generates responses corresponding to grade levels well-above accepted recommendations for presenting medical information to patients. Significant rates of AI hallucination may preclude clinicians from recommending the current version of ChatGPT as an educational tool for patients at this time.

Evaluating ChatGPT responses on obstructive sleep apnea for patient education.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the quality of ChatGPT responses to questions on obstructive sleep apnea for patient education and assessed how prompting the chatbot influences correctness, estimated grade level, and references of answers. METHODS: ChatGPT was queried 4 times with 24 identical questions. Queries differed by initial prompting: no prompting, patient-friendly prompting, physician-level prompting, and prompting for statistics/references. Answers were scored on a hierarchical scale: incorrect, partially correct, correct, correct with either statistic or referenced citation ("correct+"), or correct with both a statistic and citation ("perfect"). Flesch-Kincaid grade level and citation publication years were recorded for answers. Proportions of responses at incremental score thresholds were compared by prompt type using chi-squared analysis. The relationship between prompt type and grade level was assessed using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Across all prompts (n = 96 questions), 69 answers (71.9%) were at least correct. Proportions of responses that were at least partially correct (P = .387) or correct (P = .453) did not differ by prompt; responses that were at least correct+ (P < .001) or perfect (P < .001) did. Statistics/references prompting provided 74/77 (96.1%) references. Responses from patient-friendly prompting had a lower mean grade level (12.45 ± 2.32) than no prompting (14.15 ± 1.59), physician-level prompting (14.27 ± 2.09), and statistics/references prompting (15.00 ± 2.26) (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT overall provides appropriate answers to most questions on obstructive sleep apnea regardless of prompting. While prompting decreases response grade level, all responses remained above accepted recommendations for presenting medical information to patients. Given ChatGPT's rapid implementation, sleep experts may seek to further scrutinize its medical literacy and utility for patients. CITATION: Campbell DJ, Estephan LE, Mastrolonardo EV, Amin DR, Huntley CT, Boon MS. Evaluating ChatGPT responses on obstructive sleep apnea for patient education. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):1989-1995.

Differences in Functional and Survival Outcomes Between Patients Receiving Primary Surgery vs Chemoradiation Therapy for Treatment of T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: Due to lack of data from high-powered randomized clinical trials, the differences in functional and survival outcomes for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) undergoing primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) vs primary radiation therapy and/or chemoradiation therapy (RT/CRT) are unclear. Objectives: To compare 5-year functional (dysphagia, tracheostomy dependence, and gastrostomy tube dependence) and survivorship outcomes in patients with T1-T2 OPSCC receiving primary TORS vs RT/CRT. Design, Setting, and Population: This national multicenter cohort study used data from a global health network (TriNetX) to identify differences in functional and survival outcomes among patients with OPSCC who underwent primary TORS or RT/CRT in 2002 to 2022. After propensity matching, 726 patients with OPSCC met inclusion criteria. In the TORS group, 363 (50%) patients had undergone primary surgery, and in the RT/CRT group, 363 (50%) patients had received primary RT/CRT. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to January 2023 using the TriNetX platform. Exposure: Primary surgery with TORS or primary treatment with radiation therapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Propensity score matching was used to balance the 2 groups. Functional outcomes were measured at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and more than 5 years posttreatment and included dysphagia, gastrostomy tube dependence, and tracheostomy dependence according to standard medical codes. Five-year overall survivorship was compared between patients undergoing primary TORS vs RT/CRT. Results: Propensity score matching allowed a study sample with 2 cohorts comprising statistically similar parameters with 363 (50%) patients in each. Patients in the TORS cohort had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.9) vs 68.8 (9.7) years in RT/CRT cohort; 86% and 88% were White individuals, respectively; 79% of patients were men in both cohorts. Primary TORS was associated with clinically meaningful increased risk of dysphagia at 6 months (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-1.84) and 1 year posttreatment (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.22-2.39) compared with primary RT/CRT. Patients receiving surgery were less likely to be gastrostomy tube dependent at 6 months (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00) and 5 years posttreatment (risk difference, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02). Differences in overall rates of tracheostomy dependence (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.51-1.82) between groups were not clinically meaningful. Patients with OPSCC, unmatched for cancer stage or human papillomavirus status, who received RT/CRT had worse 5-year overall survival than those who underwent primary surgery (70.2% vs 58.4%; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This national multicenter cohort study of patients undergoing primary TORS vs primary RT/CRT for T1-T2 OPSCC found that primary TORS was associated with a clinically meaningful increased risk of short-term dysphagia. Patients treated with primary RT/CRT had an increased risk of short- and long-term gastrostomy tube dependence and worse 5-year overall survival than those who underwent surgery.