How smart is artificial intelligence in organs delineation? Testing a CE and FDA-approved Deep-Learning tool using multiple expert contours delineated on planning CT images.

Background: A CE- and FDA-approved cloud-based Deep learning (DL)-tool for automatic organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes segmentation on computer tomography images is available. Before its implementation in the clinical practice, an independent external validation was conducted. Methods: At least a senior and two in training Radiation Oncologists (ROs) manually contoured the volumes of interest (VOIs) for 6 tumoral sites. The auto-segmented contours were retrieved from the DL-tool and, if needed, manually corrected by ROs. The level of ROs satisfaction and the duration of contouring were registered. Relative volume differences, similarity indices, satisfactory grades, and time saved were analyzed using a semi-automatic tool. Results: Seven thousand seven hundred sixty-five VOIs were delineated on the CT images of 111 representative patients. The median (range) time for manual VOIs delineation, DL-based segmentation, and subsequent manual corrections were 25.0 (8.0-115.0), 2.3 (1.2-8) and 10.0 minutes (0.3-46.3), respectively. The overall time for VOIs retrieving and modification was statistically significantly lower than for manual contouring (p<0.001). The DL-tool was generally appreciated by ROs, with 44% of vote 4 (well done) and 43% of vote 5 (very well done), correlated with the saved time (p<0.001). The relative volume differences and similarity indexes suggested a better inter-agreement of manually adjusted DL-based VOIs than manually segmented ones. Conclusions: The application of the DL-tool resulted satisfactory, especially in complex delineation cases, improving the ROs inter-agreement of delineated VOIs and saving time.

Cosmetic Results and Side Effects of Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Versus Whole-Breast Irradiation for Low-Risk Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast: The Randomized Phase III IRMA Trial.

PURPOSE: The results in terms of side effects vary among the published accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) studies. Here, we report the 5-year results for cosmetic outcomes and toxicity of the IRMA trial. METHODS: We ran this randomized phase III trial in 35 centers. Women with stage I-IIA breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery, age ≥ 49 years, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either whole-breast irradiation (WBI) or external beam radiation therapy APBI (38.5 Gy/10 fraction twice daily). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary end point was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. We hereby present the analysis of the secondary outcomes, cosmesis, and normal tissue toxicity. All side effects were graded with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema. Analysis was performed with both intention-to-treat and as-treated approaches. RESULTS: Between March 2007 and March 2019, 3,309 patients were randomly assigned to 1,657 WBI and 1,652 APBI; 3,225 patients comprised the intention-to-treat population (1,623 WBI and 1,602 APBI). At a median follow-up of 5.6 (interquartile range, 4.0-8.4) years, adverse cosmesis in the APBI patients was higher than that in the WBI patients at 3 years (12.7% v 9.2%; P = .009) and at 5 years (14% v 9.8%; P = .012). Late soft tissue toxicity (grade ≥ 3: 2.8% APBI v 1% WBI, P < .0001) and late bone toxicity (grade ≥ 3: 1.1% APBI v 0% WBI, P < .0001) were significantly higher in the APBI arm. There were no significant differences in late skin and lung toxicities. CONCLUSION: External beam radiation therapy-APBI with a twice-daily IRMA schedule was associated with increased rates of late moderate soft tissue and bone toxicities, with a slight decrease in patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 5 years when compared with WBI, although overall toxicity was in an acceptable range.

Improving total body irradiation with a dedicated couch and 3D-printed patient-specific lung blocks: A feasibility study.

Introduction: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important component of the conditioning regimen in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants. TBI is used in very few patients and therefore it is generally delivered with standard linear accelerators (LINACs) and not with dedicated devices. Severe pulmonary toxicity is the most common adverse effect after TBI, and patient-specific lead blocks are used to reduce mean lung dose. In this context, online treatment setup is crucial to achieve precise positioning of the lung blocks. Therefore, in this study we aim to report our experience at generating 3D-printed patient-specific lung blocks and coupling a dedicated couch (with an integrated onboard image device) with a modern LINAC for TBI treatment. Material and methods: TBI was planned and delivered (2Gy/fraction given twice a day, over 3 days) to 15 patients. Online images, to be compared with planned digitally reconstructed radiographies, were acquired with the couch-dedicated Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) panel and imported in the iView software using a homemade Graphical User Interface (GUI). In vivo dosimetry, using Metal-Oxide Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs), was used to assess the setup reproducibility in both supine and prone positions. Results: 3D printing of lung blocks was feasible for all planned patients using a stereolithography 3D printer with a build volume of 14.5×14.5×17.5 cm3. The number of required pre-TBI EPID-images generally decreases after the first fraction. In patient-specific quality assurance, the difference between measured and calculated dose was generally<2%. The MOSFET measurements reproducibility along each treatment and patient was 2.7%, in average. Conclusion: The TBI technique was successfully implemented, demonstrating that our approach is feasible, flexible, and cost-effective. The use of 3D-printed patient-specific lung blocks have the potential to personalize TBI treatment and to refine the shape of the blocks before delivery, making them extremely versatile.

COVID-19 Pandemic-Adapted Radiotherapy Guidelines: Are They Really Followed?

BACKGROUND: In our department, we provided guidelines to the radiation oncologists (ROs) regarding the omission, delay, or shortening of radiotherapy (RT). The purpose was to reduce the patients' exposure to the hospital environment and to minimize the departmental overcrowding. The aim was to evaluate the ROs' compliance to these guidelines. METHODS: ROs were asked to fill out a data collection form during patients' first visits in May and June 2020. The collected data included the ROs' age and gender, patient age and residence, RT purpose, treated tumor, the dose and fractionation that would have been prescribed, and RT changes. The chi-square test and binomial logistic regression were used to analyze the correlation between the treatment prescription and the collected parameters. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six out of 205 prescribed treatments were included in this analysis. Treatment was modified in 61.1% of cases. More specifically, the treatment was omitted, delayed, or shortened in 7.9, 15.9, and 37.3% of patients, respectively. The number of delivered fractions was reduced by 27.9%. A statistically significant correlation (p = 0.028) between younger patients' age and lower treatment modifications rate was recorded. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed a reasonably high compliance of ROs to the pandemic-adapted guidelines. The adopted strategy was effective in reducing the number of admissions to our department.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Concomitant Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery: A Phase I-II Trial.

PURPOSE: A concomitant boost (CB) in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery of invasive breast cancer (BC) has been suggested for treatment time reduction and therapy intensification. The aim of this analysis was to assess long-term tolerability of a CB in patients treated with postoperative intensity Modulated Accelerated RAdiotherapy (MARA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I-II trial, 321 patients with intermediate-high risk BC (pT1-4 with at least one of the following characteristics: pre or perimenopausal status, pN2-3, positive or close margins) were enrolled. Patients were treated with forward-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and CB. A total dose of 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) and 60 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) was prescribed to the whole breast and the tumor bed, respectively. The potential impact of hypertension, diabetes, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy on both skin and subcutaneous late toxicity-free survival (LTFS) was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52 months (range: 3-115). Regional node irradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were prescribed to 29.3%, 65.4% and 81.0% of patients, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 skin LTFS were 95.6% and 100.0%, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 subcutaneous LTFS were 80.0% and 98.6%, respectively. Only diabetes showed a significant correlation with worse G3 subcutaneous LTFS (p: 0.024). Five-year loco-regional control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 98.0%, 91.8%, 89.7% and 96.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: IMRT combined with CB was associated with a low risk of > G2 late toxicities (0.0% and 1.4% for skin and subcutaneous tissue, respectively). The cumulative actuarial incidence of local recurrences was 2.0% despite the exclusion of low-risk patients. Our results suggest that CB is safe and effective in patients with intermediate-high risk BC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03471741.

Radiotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer: a literature review of acute and late toxicity.

Radiotherapy (RT) induced toxicity in elderly patients is not well documented in the available literature due to the inhomogeneous and fragmentary data. Aim of this study was to review literature data on acute and late toxicity in elderly breast cancer patients treated with RT. The primary endpoint was RT-related acute and late toxicity in elderly breast cancer (BC) patients. The secondary endpoint was RT interruption rate in this patients' population. All studies reporting RT-related acute and/or late toxicity in elderly women with breast cancer were included. All types of RT settings were included and no restriction was applied regarding other primary/adjuvant associated treatment. A bibliographic search was performed on PubMed. Only articles in English were considered while no chronological limitation was applied. Twenty-two studies were included in this analysis: 12 retrospective, 5 prospective observational trials, 1 phase III trial sub-analysis, and 4 phase I-II trials. Thirteen studies reported results about whole breast irradiation (WBI) delivered by external beams (EB) RT ± boost on the tumor bed. Nine studies reported results about accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) based on EB RT (2 studies), intraoperative RT (IORT: 2 studies), and brachytherapy (BRT: 2 studies); three studies compared different treatment techniques. Overall, reported acute grade (G) ≥3 toxicity ranged from 0.0% to 10.5% and late toxicity from 0.0% to 13.0%. RT discontinuation/interruption rates ranged between 0.0% and 2.0%. Acute G ≥3 toxicity rates were 2.0%, 6.7%, and 5.2% with EB-APBI, BRT, and IORT, respectively. Late G ≥3 toxicity with EB-APBI was 2.8%. No late G ≥3 toxicity was recorded in studies reporting on BRT and IORT. With WBI, the overall rates of G ≥3 toxicity were 3.0% (acute) and 1.8% (late). Higher toxicity rates were observed with weekly hypofractionation. None of the studies directly comparing age subgroups found age-related differences. Our findings suggest that RT of breast cancer is well tolerated even in elderly patients with toxicity rates comparable to those of the general population. Given these considerations, RT omission in elderly patients with breast cancer should be carefully evaluated limiting this option to very selected critical patients.

Whole Lung Irradiation in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Whole lung irradiation (WLI) represents standard therapy for patients with pulmonary metastases from Ewing sarcoma although the impact on clinical outcomes and toxicity is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate toxicity after WLI in patients with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma as well as overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of studies on bilateral pulmonary irradiation treatments for prophylactic or curative therapy was performed based on PRISMA methodology. Data base searches on PubMed and Cochrane Library from the earliest time possible through 31st March 2018 were carried out. Combination with other treatments, such as chemotherapy and surgery were allowed. Only articles published in English were considered. RESULTS: Toxicity was evaluated in 13 of the 14 analyzed studies (640 patients). Reported lung acute toxicity grade ≥3 ranged between 0.0 and 12.2%. Three studies reported 12 cases (1.8%) of severe pneumonitis. Grade ≥2 late toxicity was mainly recorded in patients who received boost irradiation, previous thoracic surgery, chemotherapy or who were smokers. Lack of a significant impact of WLI on OS was reported in comparative studies although patients treated with WLI showed higher survival in most individual studies. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of severe toxicity was very low, the real impact of WLI on patients' outcomes remains unproven, probably due to the narrow dose limits that can be delivered to the whole lung parenchyma. New strategies to prevent or treat lung metastases in these patients should be tested. Ultra-fractionated radiotherapy concurrent with modern chemotherapy protocols could be tested in this setting due to the chemo-sensitizing effect and negligible radio-induced toxicity of fraction doses <0.5 Gy.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer: current perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Owing to highly conformed dose distribution, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential to improve treatment results of radiotherapy (RT). Postoperative RT is a standard adjuvant treatment in conservative treatment of breast cancer (BC). The aim of this review is to analyze available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IMRT in BC, particularly in terms of reduction of side effects. METHODS: A literature search of the bibliographic database PubMed, from January 1990 through November 2016, was performed. Only RCTs published in English were included. RESULTS: Ten articles reporting data from 5 RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in our review. Three out of 5 studies enrolled only selected patients in terms of increased risk of toxicity. Three studies compared IMRT with standard tangential RT. One study compared the results of IMRT in the supine versus the prone position, and one study compared standard treatment with accelerated partial breast IMRT. Three studies reported reduced acute and/or late toxicity using IMRT compared with standard RT. No study reported improved quality of life. CONCLUSION: IMRT seems able to reduce toxicity in selected patients treated with postoperative RT for BC. Further analyses are needed to better define patients who are candidates for this treatment modality.

11C-methionine vs. 18F-FDG PET in soft tissue sarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) the histological response (tumour grade regression: TGR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may influence the outcome. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of 11C-methionine (MET) and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with STS treated with neoadjuvant CRT, correlating TGR with SUVmax (standardized uptake value) percentage variation before and after CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with STS already scheduled for a neoadjuvant CRT and surgery were enrolled. They underwent MET and FDG PET/CT in a one-day procedure before and after the CRT. Pre-therapy SUVmax and the percentage variation of SUVmax for MET and FDG were correlated with TGR according to the Huvos grade. Grades I-II were considered as partial responders (PR) and grades III-IV as complete responders (CR). RESULTS: FDG pre-treatment mean SUVmax in PR patients was 7.1, while in CR patients it was 13.2. Pre-treatment mean MET SUVmax in PR patients was 75, while in CR patients it was 4.9. The mean percentage variation in FDG SUVmax, was -21.2% in PR patients and -745% in CR patients while that for MET SUVmax was 48% in PR patients and -53.9% in CR patients. CONCLUSION: According to this preliminary study, the percentage variation in FDG before and after CRT seems to discriminate between PR and CR better than MET.