Characterization and prediction of clinical pathways of vulnerability to psychosis through graph signal processing.

Causal interactions between specific psychiatric symptoms could contribute to the heterogenous clinical trajectories observed in early psychopathology. Current diagnostic approaches merge clinical manifestations that co-occur across subjects and could significantly hinder our understanding of clinical pathways connecting individual symptoms. Network analysis techniques have emerged as alternative approaches that could help shed light on the complex dynamics of early psychopathology. The present study attempts to address the two main limitations that have in our opinion hindered the application of network approaches in the clinical setting. Firstly, we show that a multi-layer network analysis approach, can move beyond a static view of psychopathology, by providing an intuitive characterization of the role of specific symptoms in contributing to clinical trajectories over time. Secondly, we show that a Graph-Signal-Processing approach, can exploit knowledge of longitudinal interactions between symptoms, to predict clinical trajectories at the level of the individual. We test our approaches in two independent samples of individuals with genetic and clinical vulnerability for developing psychosis. Novel network approaches can allow to embrace the dynamic complexity of early psychopathology and help pave the way towards a more a personalized approach to clinical care.

Can youth at high risk of illness progression be identified by measures of rumination and sleep-wake disturbance.

AIM: Clinical staging models offer a useful framework for understanding illness trajectories, where individuals are located on a continuum of illness progression from stage 0 (at-risk but asymptomatic) to stage 4 (end-stage disease). Importantly, clinical staging allows investigation of risk factors for illness progression with the potential to target trans-diagnostic mechanisms at an early stage, especially in help-seeking youth who often present with sub-threshold syndromes. While depressive symptoms, rumination and sleep-wake disturbances may worsen syndrome outcomes, the role of these related phenomena has yet to be examined as risk factors for trans-diagnostic illness progression in at-risk youth. METHODS: This study is a prospective follow-up of 248 individuals aged 12 to 25 years presenting to headspace services with sub-threshold syndromes (stage 1) classified under the clinical staging model to determine transition to threshold syndromes (stage 2). Factor analysis of depression, rumination and sleep-wake patterns was used to identify key dimensions and any associations between factors and transition to stage 2 at follow-up. RESULTS: At 1 year, 9% of cases met criteria for stage 2 (n = 22). One of three identified factors, namely the factor reflecting the commonalities shared between rumination and sleep-wake disturbance, significantly differentiated cases that transitioned to stage 2 vs those that did not demonstrate transition. Items loading onto this factor, labelled Anergia, included depression severity and aspects of rumination and sleep-wake disturbance that were characterized as introceptive. CONCLUSIONS: Common dimensions between rumination and sleep-wake disturbance present a detectable trans-diagnostic marker of illness progression in youth, and may represent a target for early intervention.

The Beyond Ageing Project Phase 2--a double-blind, selective prevention, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids and sertraline in an older age cohort at risk for depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Late-life depression is associated with high rates of morbidity, premature mortality, disability, functional decline, caregiver burden and increased health care costs. While clinical and public health approaches are focused on prevention or early intervention strategies, the ideal method of intervention remains unclear. No study has set out to evaluate the role of neurobiological agents in preventing depressive symptoms in older populations at risk of depression. METHODS/DESIGN: Subjects with previously reported sub-threshold depressive symptoms, aged 60 to 74 years, will be screened to participate in a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial with three parallel groups involving omega-3 fatty acid supplementation or sertraline hydrochloride, compared with matching placebo. Subjects will be excluded if they have current depression or suicide ideation; are taking antidepressants or any supplement containing omega-3 fatty acid; or have a prior history of stroke or other serious cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, significant psychiatric disease (other than depression) or neurodegenerative disease. The trial will consist of a 12 month treatment phase with follow-up at three months and 12 months to assess outcome events. At three months, subjects will undergo structural neuroimaging to assess whether treatment effects on depressive symptoms correlate with brain changes. Additionally, proton spectroscopy techniques will be used to capture brain-imaging markers of the biological effects of the interventions. The trial will be conducted in urban New South Wales, Australia, and will recruit a community-based sample of 450 adults. Using intention-to-treat methods, the primary endpoint is an absence of clinically relevant depression scores at 12 months between the omega-3 fatty acid and sertraline interventions and the placebo condition. DISCUSSION: The current health, social and economic costs of late-life depression make prevention imperative from a public health perspective. This innovative trial aims to address the long-neglected area of prevention of depression in older adults. The interventions are targeted to the pathophysiology of disease, and regardless of the effect size of treatment, the outcomes will offer major scientific advances regarding the neurobiological action of these agents. The main results are expected to be available in 2017. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000032055 (12 January 2010).

Perinatal use of aripiprazole: plasma levels, placental transfer, and child outcome in 3 new cases.

The use of new agents of second-generation antipsychotics in childbearing women is increasing and poses an unknown risk to the fetus; thus, information of pregnancy and child outcome are urgently needed. We reviewed the literature of 12 patients, 3 of them were exposed during the first trimester, and added 3 new cases of peripartum use of aripiprazole. No teratogenesis was observed despite all 3 women having received the substance during part or full first trimester. All 3 pregnancies were uncomplicated with spontaneous birth. Dosage had to be changed during the course of gestation from 2.5 to 15 mg and plasma levels (PL) were below recommended levels, although all 3 women remained in stable remission throughout pregnancy and postpartum period.The extent of placental transfer of aripiprazole (mean ratio of 56.2%) is comparable with that of other second-generation antipsychotics.Our observations have clinical implications: antipsychotic PLs show large-scale decreases, which may require dose adjustments during pregnancy. Pregnant women may require lower PLs. In our cases, a PL of one third of the previous effective PL was effective and safe. Repeated therapeutic drug monitoring during late gestation based on individual, previous effective PLs seems to be a feasible way for safe and effective antipsychotic therapy in unplanned pregnancy.

Dosing quetiapine in drug-naive first-episode psychosis: a controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center study investigating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 200 mg/day vs. 400 mg/day of quetiapine fumarate in 141 patients aged 15 to 25 years.

OBJECTIVE: To assess dosing, efficacy, and tolerability of quetiapine fumarate in drug-naive first-episode psychosis. METHOD: We present a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center, double-blind, fixed-dose, 4-week comparison study of 200 mg/day versus 400 mg/day of quetiapine in 141 drug-naive acutely ill first-episode psychosis patients (diagnosed according to DSM-IV) aged 15 to 25 years. The double-blind 4-week trial (Part 1) was followed by a single-blind, naturalistic, flexible-dose 8-week period (Part 2). The main outcome measures were symptomatic change, functioning, and tolerability. Data were collected from July 2003 until January 2006. RESULTS: The estimated time trends of the linear mixed-effects modeling indicated that efficacy between the 2 treatment groups in Part 1 was similar for most outcome measures except for 5 measures: the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) anhedonia-asociality subscale (p = .011), the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (p = .020), the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (p = .070), the SANS affective flattening or blunting subscale (p = .051), and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser total (p = .056), suggesting that the 200-mg group improved more for the SANS anhedonia-asociality subscale, whereas the 400-mg group showed a slight deterioration. Social and global functioning also improved more in the 200-mg group than in the 400-mg group. Part 2 of the study revealed that, independent of the initial target dose, when clinicians were able to adjust the dose flexibly, the dose at 12 weeks was similar between groups and averaged 268 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Our study in acutely ill drug-naive first-episode psychosis patients suggests that quetiapine is a safe and well-tolerated antipsychotic medication. In contrast to multiepisode patients, dosing should be more conservative in untreated new-onset cases. An initial dose of 250 to 300 mg/day of quetiapine is proposed as a primary target dose in drug-naive first-episode psychosis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449397.