Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 12(3)2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719507

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Studies have found that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1) have cardiovascular benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or heart failure (HF). The literature does not provide evidence specifically for patients with these conditions who are adding one of these medicines to two glucose-lowering medications (ie, as "third-step" therapy). We explored the effects of different third-step medications on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and these comorbid conditions. Specifically, we compared third-step SGLT2 or GLP1 to third-step dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4), insulin, or thiazolidinediones (TZD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of adults at five Kaiser Permanente sites with DM2 and ASCVD, CKD, or HF, initiating third-step treatment between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score weighted Poisson models were used to calculate adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) for all-cause mortality, incident major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and incident HF hospitalization in patients initiating SGLT2 or GLP1 compared with DPP4, insulin, or TZD. RESULTS: We identified 27 542 patients initiating third-step treatment with one or more of these conditions (19 958 with ASCVD, 14 577 with CKD, and 3919 with HF). ARRs for GLP1 and SGLT2 versus DPP4, insulin, and TZD in the patient subgroups ranged between 0.22 and 0.55 for all-cause mortality, 0.38 and 0.81 for MACE, and 0.46 and 1.05 for HF hospitalization. Many ARRs were statistically significant, and all significant ARRs showed a benefit (ARR <1) for GLP1 or SGLT2 when compared with DPP4, insulin, or TZD. CONCLUSIONS: Third-step SGLT2 and GLP1 are generally associated with a benefit for these outcomes in these patient groups when compared with third-step DPP4, insulin, or TZD. Our results add to evidence of a cardiovascular benefit of SGLT2 and GLP1 and could inform clinical guidelines for choosing third-step diabetes treatment.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1 , Hipoglicemiantes , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/análise , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Insulina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...